UMBF vs HL
Comparison between UMB Financial Corp (UMBF, Company) and Hecla Mining Company (HL, Company).
UMBF is from the Financial Services sector, while HL is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceHL has outperformed UMBF, delivering a return of +21.2% compared to +10.5%
UMBF vs HL - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
UMBF vs HL - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
UMBF vs HL - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | UMBF | HL |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +25.48% | -15.92% |
| 2025 | +4.43% | +265.62% |
| 2024 | +36.78% | +5.45% |
| 2023 | +3.42% | -14.47% |
| 2022 | -20.94% | +8.23% |
| 2021 | +56.84% | -22.67% |
| 2020 | +2.31% | +90.18% |
| 2019 | +12.96% | +38.01% |
| 2018 | -14.08% | -44.16% |
| 2017 | -4.73% | -27.67% |
| 2016 | +72.72% | +177.88% |
| 2015 | -15.46% | -33.17% |
| 2014 | -8.37% | -11.13% |
| 2013 | +45.29% | -49.33% |
| 2012 | +16.28% | +2.42% |
| 2011 | -10.95% | -53.32% |
| 2010 | +7.25% | +74.03% |
| 2009 | -18.23% | +123.10% |
| 2008 | +33.58% | -71.34% |
| 2007 | +5.13% | +25.17% |
| 2006 | +13.65% | +74.49% |
| 2005 | +15.86% | -28.01% |
| 2004 | +20.02% | -31.25% |
| 2003 | +25.51% | +58.51% |
| 2002 | -4.66% | +444.09% |
| 2001 | +17.31% | +67.11% |
| 2000 | +4.09% | -68.01% |
| 1999 | -9.66% | -34.19% |
UMBF vs HL Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for UMBF was -52.70%, occurring on Oct 3, 2011. Recovery took 1303 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for HL was -91.94%, occurring on Nov 12, 2008. Recovery took 4393 trading sessions.
The current UMBF drawdown is -2.16%. The current HL drawdown is -50.12%.
| Rank | UMBF | HL |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -52.70% Sep 19, 2008 - Nov 21, 2013 | -91.94% Apr 16, 2008 - Oct 1, 2025 |
| #2 | -50.23% Jan 14, 2022 - Sep 19, 2024 | -78.95% Nov 1, 1999 - Apr 2, 2002 |
| #3 | -45.00% Jun 8, 2018 - Jan 7, 2021 | -66.95% Jan 5, 2004 - Apr 2, 2007 |
| #4 | -37.76% Jan 22, 2014 - Nov 9, 2016 | -55.81% Jan 23, 2026 - Jun 10, 2026 |
| #5 | -31.80% Nov 25, 2024 - Jan 21, 2026 | -54.15% Jun 4, 2002 - Dec 26, 2002 |
| #6 | -29.26% Nov 3, 1999 - Jun 28, 2001 | -50.87% Jan 6, 2003 - Jul 28, 2003 |
| #7 | -27.59% May 15, 2002 - Sep 16, 2003 | -31.63% Apr 16, 2007 - Nov 6, 2007 |
| #8 | -22.52% Sep 19, 2007 - Apr 24, 2008 | -30.49% Nov 28, 2007 - Mar 14, 2008 |
| #9 | -21.27% Mar 1, 2017 - Jun 7, 2018 | -25.18% Sep 11, 2003 - Nov 18, 2003 |
| #10 | -18.57% Feb 6, 2026 - May 6, 2026 | -21.46% Oct 16, 2025 - Nov 12, 2025 |
| #11 | -16.25% Aug 21, 2001 - Apr 1, 2002 | -16.19% Mar 14, 2008 - Apr 16, 2008 |
| #12 | -16.10% Jun 20, 2008 - Jul 22, 2008 | -15.29% May 7, 2002 - May 20, 2002 |
| #13 | -14.40% May 14, 2021 - Oct 1, 2021 | -14.94% Nov 12, 2025 - Nov 26, 2025 |
| #14 | -12.75% Aug 11, 2008 - Sep 18, 2008 | -13.50% Apr 10, 2002 - Apr 18, 2002 |
| #15 | -10.65% Dec 9, 2016 - Feb 21, 2017 | -12.13% Dec 2, 2003 - Dec 29, 2003 |
Correlation
Correlation between UMBF and HL is 0.47 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
UMBF vs HL dividend yield comparison.
| Year | UMBF | HL |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.59% | 0.05% |
| 2025 | 1.42% | 0.08% |
| 2024 | 1.39% | 0.82% |
| 2023 | 1.83% | 0.65% |
| 2022 | 1.78% | 0.41% |
| 2021 | 1.30% | 0.72% |
| 2020 | 1.81% | 0.25% |
| 2019 | 1.76% | 0.29% |
| 2018 | 1.92% | 0.42% |
| 2017 | 1.45% | 0.25% |
| 2016 | 1.28% | 0.19% |
| 2015 | 2.04% | 0.53% |
| 2014 | 1.60% | 0.36% |
| 2013 | 1.35% | 0.65% |
| 2012 | 1.89% | 1.03% |
| 2011 | 2.12% | 0.38% |
| 2010 | 1.81% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 1.80% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 1.67% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 1.49% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 1.41% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 1.42% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 1.50% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 1.70% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 2.09% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 1.45% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 2.14% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.50% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks