NCZ vs DSM
Comparison between Virtus Convertible & Income Fund II (NCZ, ETF) and BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund Inc (DSM, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceNCZ has outperformed DSM, delivering a return of +5.9% compared to -1.5%
NCZ vs DSM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
NCZ vs DSM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
NCZ vs DSM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | NCZ | DSM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +14.62% | +0.60% |
| 2025 | +23.56% | +10.70% |
| 2024 | +19.58% | +4.98% |
| 2023 | +16.86% | +3.00% |
| 2022 | -35.66% | -27.37% |
| 2021 | +10.11% | +11.90% |
| 2020 | +11.35% | +3.37% |
| 2019 | +22.29% | +18.05% |
| 2018 | -18.47% | -13.10% |
| 2017 | +23.36% | +12.39% |
| 2016 | +29.64% | +4.71% |
| 2015 | -34.67% | +7.30% |
| 2014 | +10.11% | +15.36% |
| 2013 | +24.09% | -16.99% |
| 2012 | +9.02% | +14.93% |
| 2011 | -6.63% | +24.19% |
| 2010 | +25.37% | +5.63% |
| 2009 | +111.32% | +45.32% |
| 2008 | -61.60% | -24.63% |
| 2007 | -12.60% | -13.34% |
| 2006 | +22.86% | +23.72% |
| 2005 | +0.13% | +1.31% |
| 2004 | +12.68% | +4.76% |
| 2003 | +6.87% | +18.37% |
| 2002 | N/A | +2.05% |
| 2001 | N/A | +3.76% |
| 2000 | N/A | +23.02% |
| 1999 | N/A | -6.54% |
NCZ vs DSM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for NCZ was -79.41%, occurring on Nov 21, 2008. Recovery took 926 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for DSM was -49.10%, occurring on Oct 10, 2008. Recovery took 691 trading sessions.
The current NCZ drawdown is -3.77%. The current DSM drawdown is -11.86%.
| Rank | NCZ | DSM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -79.41% Jun 4, 2007 - Feb 3, 2011 | -49.10% May 4, 2007 - Feb 1, 2010 |
| #2 | -56.04% Feb 19, 2020 - Dec 4, 2020 | -38.73% Aug 3, 2021 - Oct 25, 2023 |
| #3 | -50.80% Jul 3, 2014 - Jun 8, 2018 | -31.97% Nov 6, 2019 - May 5, 2021 |
| #4 | -43.93% Nov 8, 2021 - Sep 10, 2025 | -23.32% Jan 9, 2013 - Dec 21, 2015 |
| #5 | -30.38% Sep 14, 2018 - Feb 18, 2020 | -17.18% Oct 1, 2010 - Aug 31, 2011 |
| #6 | -26.78% Jun 3, 2011 - Sep 12, 2012 | -16.59% Aug 2, 2017 - May 9, 2019 |
| #7 | -17.42% Apr 2, 2004 - Sep 13, 2004 | -16.42% Feb 18, 2004 - Nov 3, 2004 |
| #8 | -13.07% Oct 8, 2012 - Jan 25, 2013 | -13.68% Jul 8, 2005 - Aug 16, 2006 |
| #9 | -11.95% Feb 13, 2026 - Apr 9, 2026 | -12.71% Sep 30, 2002 - Mar 4, 2003 |
| #10 | -11.62% Dec 28, 2004 - Jul 14, 2005 | -12.32% Nov 12, 1999 - Jan 28, 2000 |
| #11 | -8.85% Feb 12, 2021 - Jun 11, 2021 | -12.03% Aug 13, 2001 - Jul 1, 2002 |
| #12 | -8.61% May 20, 2013 - Oct 11, 2013 | -11.60% Sep 28, 2016 - Jul 12, 2017 |
| #13 | -7.41% Sep 6, 2005 - Jan 10, 2006 | -11.55% Jun 16, 2003 - Jan 7, 2004 |
| #14 | -6.84% Mar 9, 2011 - May 27, 2011 | -8.87% Jan 28, 2000 - Apr 4, 2000 |
| #15 | -6.39% Nov 3, 2025 - Dec 24, 2025 | -7.89% Sep 30, 2011 - Dec 6, 2011 |
Correlation
Correlation between NCZ and DSM is 0.87 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
NCZ vs DSM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | NCZ | DSM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.91% | 2.08% |
| 2025 | 10.45% | 4.07% |
| 2024 | 11.50% | 3.72% |
| 2023 | 12.84% | 4.27% |
| 2022 | 15.62% | 5.95% |
| 2021 | 8.82% | 4.31% |
| 2020 | 9.28% | 4.57% |
| 2019 | 11.28% | 5.19% |
| 2018 | 15.33% | 6.11% |
| 2017 | 13.80% | 5.82% |
| 2016 | 12.08% | 6.19% |
| 2015 | 18.02% | 6.17% |
| 2014 | 11.45% | 7.71% |
| 2013 | 11.36% | 7.68% |
| 2012 | 12.86% | 6.60% |
| 2011 | 12.96% | 6.56% |
| 2010 | 12.38% | 7.22% |
| 2009 | 12.41% | 6.09% |
| 2008 | 27.60% | 8.38% |
| 2007 | 12.97% | 6.37% |
| 2006 | 10.52% | 5.39% |
| 2005 | 12.68% | 7.15% |
| 2004 | 9.87% | 7.19% |
| 2003 | 3.76% | 6.90% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 6.94% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 6.67% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 6.94% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 1.36% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks