StockComparison Logo
vs

NCZ vs EFT

Comparison between Virtus Convertible & Income Fund II (NCZ, ETF) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceNCZ has outperformed EFT, delivering a return of +5.9% compared to +3.4%

NCZ vs EFT - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Net Assets
NCZ
$321M
Winner
EFT
$321M
Max Drawdown
NCZ
85.64%
Winner
EFT
66.40%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
NCZ
1.85
EFT
-0.85
5Y Beta
NCZ
0.80
Winner
EFT
0.41
5Y Dividends CAGR
NCZ
-1.12%
Winner
EFT
8.43%

NCZ vs EFT - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
NCZ
+0.30%
EFT
-1.20%
3M
Winner
NCZ
+9.83%
EFT
+0.02%
6M
Winner
NCZ
+14.78%
EFT
-2.20%
1Y
Winner
NCZ
+38.62%
EFT
-4.58%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
NCZ
+5.92%
EFT
+3.40%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
NCZ
+8.61%
EFT
+5.31%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
NCZ
+6.00%
EFT
+4.59%

NCZ vs EFT - Annual Returns (2003 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearNCZEFT
2026+14.62%-1.64%
2025+23.56%-4.98%
2024+19.58%+10.09%
2023+16.86%+25.67%
2022-35.66%-19.37%
2021+10.11%+21.84%
2020+11.35%+2.02%
2019+22.29%+15.47%
2018-18.47%-6.38%
2017+23.36%+1.03%
2016+29.64%+26.83%
2015-34.67%-3.08%
2014+10.11%-3.45%
2013+24.09%-6.56%
2012+9.02%+25.50%
2011-6.63%-5.17%
2010+25.37%+19.50%
2009+111.32%+82.60%
2008-61.60%-44.31%
2007-12.60%-8.04%
2006+22.86%+17.88%
2005+0.13%-5.07%
2004+12.68%-2.51%
2003+6.87%N/A

NCZ vs EFT Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for NCZ was -79.41%, occurring on Nov 21, 2008. Recovery took 926 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for EFT was -60.58%, occurring on Dec 15, 2008. Recovery took 675 trading sessions.

The current NCZ drawdown is -3.77%. The current EFT drawdown is -11.04%.

RankNCZEFT
#1-79.41%
Jun 4, 2007 - Feb 3, 2011
-60.58%
Jun 25, 2007 - Mar 1, 2010
#2-56.04%
Feb 19, 2020 - Dec 4, 2020
-45.43%
Jan 22, 2020 - Dec 3, 2020
#3-50.80%
Jul 3, 2014 - Jun 8, 2018
-24.97%
Jan 12, 2022 - Dec 15, 2023
#4-43.93%
Nov 8, 2021 - Sep 10, 2025
-23.47%
May 23, 2013 - Nov 11, 2016
#5-30.38%
Sep 14, 2018 - Feb 18, 2020
-20.16%
Feb 24, 2011 - Mar 21, 2012
#6-26.78%
Jun 3, 2011 - Sep 12, 2012
-17.49%
Jan 24, 2025 - Apr 7, 2025
#7-17.42%
Apr 2, 2004 - Sep 13, 2004
-15.52%
Apr 12, 2018 - Dec 16, 2019
#8-13.07%
Oct 8, 2012 - Jan 25, 2013
-13.57%
Mar 25, 2010 - Oct 21, 2010
#9-11.95%
Feb 13, 2026 - Apr 9, 2026
-10.39%
Mar 4, 2005 - Mar 16, 2006
#10-11.62%
Dec 28, 2004 - Jul 14, 2005
-9.92%
Mar 27, 2012 - Aug 20, 2012
#11-8.85%
Feb 12, 2021 - Jun 11, 2021
-7.83%
Oct 25, 2012 - Dec 19, 2012
#12-8.61%
May 20, 2013 - Oct 11, 2013
-6.75%
Jul 27, 2017 - Mar 14, 2018
#13-7.41%
Sep 6, 2005 - Jan 10, 2006
-5.95%
Oct 4, 2012 - Oct 25, 2012
#14-6.84%
Mar 9, 2011 - May 27, 2011
-5.70%
Jul 23, 2024 - Nov 7, 2024
#15-6.39%
Nov 3, 2025 - Dec 24, 2025
-5.63%
Sep 10, 2021 - Jan 10, 2022

Correlation

Correlation between NCZ and EFT is 0.89 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.89
-101

Dividend Comparison (2003 - 2026)

NCZ vs EFT dividend yield comparison.

YearNCZEFT
20263.91%2.78%
202510.45%9.55%
202411.50%10.52%
202312.84%11.09%
202215.62%9.81%
20218.82%5.24%
20209.28%5.88%
201911.28%7.41%
201815.33%6.77%
201713.80%5.73%
201612.08%5.54%
201518.02%6.57%
201411.45%5.82%
201311.36%6.62%
201212.86%5.62%
201112.96%7.17%
201012.38%5.85%
200912.41%6.02%
200827.60%15.12%
200712.97%9.97%
200610.52%8.47%
200512.68%7.46%
20049.87%2.45%
20033.76%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare