EFT vs DSM

Comparison between Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT, ETF) and BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund Inc (DSM, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceEFT has outperformed DSM, delivering a return of +3.4% compared to -1.5%

EFT vs DSM - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	EFT(ETF)	DSM(ETF)
Net Assets	$321M	$321M
Max Drawdown	66.40%	53.69%
Sharpe Ratio	-0.85	1.07
5Y Beta	0.41	0.19
5Y Dividends CAGR	8.43%	-4.74%

Net Assets

EFT

$321M

DSM

$321M

Max Drawdown

EFT

66.40%

Winner

DSM

53.69%

Sharpe Ratio

EFT

-0.85

Winner

DSM

1.07

5Y Beta

EFT

0.41

Winner

DSM

0.19

5Y Dividends CAGR

Winner

EFT

8.43%

DSM

-4.74%

EFT vs DSM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	EFT	DSM
1 month	-1.20%	+0.42%
3 months	+0.02%	+1.29%
6 months	-2.20%	+3.50%
1 year	-4.58%	+14.94%
5 years(CAGR)	+3.40%	-1.46%
10 years(CAGR)	+5.31%	+1.25%
Max(CAGR)	+4.59%	+5.15%

EFT

-1.20%

Winner

DSM

+0.42%

EFT

+0.02%

Winner

DSM

+1.29%

EFT

-2.20%

Winner

DSM

+3.50%

EFT

-4.58%

Winner

DSM

+14.94%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

EFT

+3.40%

DSM

-1.46%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

EFT

+5.31%

DSM

+1.25%

Max(CAGR)

EFT

+4.59%

Winner

DSM

+5.15%

EFT vs DSM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	EFT	DSM
2026	-1.64%	+0.60%
2025	-4.98%	+10.70%
2024	+10.09%	+4.98%
2023	+25.67%	+3.00%
2022	-19.37%	-27.37%
2021	+21.84%	+11.90%
2020	+2.02%	+3.37%
2019	+15.47%	+18.05%
2018	-6.38%	-13.10%
2017	+1.03%	+12.39%
2016	+26.83%	+4.71%
2015	-3.08%	+7.30%
2014	-3.45%	+15.36%
2013	-6.56%	-16.99%
2012	+25.50%	+14.93%
2011	-5.17%	+24.19%
2010	+19.50%	+5.63%
2009	+82.60%	+45.32%
2008	-44.31%	-24.63%
2007	-8.04%	-13.34%
2006	+17.88%	+23.72%
2005	-5.07%	+1.31%
2004	-2.51%	+4.76%
2003	N/A	+18.37%
2002	N/A	+2.05%
2001	N/A	+3.76%
2000	N/A	+23.02%
1999	N/A	-6.54%

EFT vs DSM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for EFT was -60.58%, occurring on Dec 15, 2008. Recovery took 675 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for DSM was -49.10%, occurring on Oct 10, 2008. Recovery took 691 trading sessions.

The current EFT drawdown is -11.04%. The current DSM drawdown is -11.86%.

Rank	EFT	DSM
#1	-60.58% Jun 25, 2007 - Mar 1, 2010	-49.10% May 4, 2007 - Feb 1, 2010
#2	-45.43% Jan 22, 2020 - Dec 3, 2020	-38.73% Aug 3, 2021 - Oct 25, 2023
#3	-24.97% Jan 12, 2022 - Dec 15, 2023	-31.97% Nov 6, 2019 - May 5, 2021
#4	-23.47% May 23, 2013 - Nov 11, 2016	-23.32% Jan 9, 2013 - Dec 21, 2015
#5	-20.16% Feb 24, 2011 - Mar 21, 2012	-17.18% Oct 1, 2010 - Aug 31, 2011
#6	-17.49% Jan 24, 2025 - Apr 7, 2025	-16.59% Aug 2, 2017 - May 9, 2019
#7	-15.52% Apr 12, 2018 - Dec 16, 2019	-16.42% Feb 18, 2004 - Nov 3, 2004
#8	-13.57% Mar 25, 2010 - Oct 21, 2010	-13.68% Jul 8, 2005 - Aug 16, 2006
#9	-10.39% Mar 4, 2005 - Mar 16, 2006	-12.71% Sep 30, 2002 - Mar 4, 2003
#10	-9.92% Mar 27, 2012 - Aug 20, 2012	-12.32% Nov 12, 1999 - Jan 28, 2000
#11	-7.83% Oct 25, 2012 - Dec 19, 2012	-12.03% Aug 13, 2001 - Jul 1, 2002
#12	-6.75% Jul 27, 2017 - Mar 14, 2018	-11.60% Sep 28, 2016 - Jul 12, 2017
#13	-5.95% Oct 4, 2012 - Oct 25, 2012	-11.55% Jun 16, 2003 - Jan 7, 2004
#14	-5.70% Jul 23, 2024 - Nov 7, 2024	-8.87% Jan 28, 2000 - Apr 4, 2000
#15	-5.63% Sep 10, 2021 - Jan 10, 2022	-7.89% Sep 30, 2011 - Dec 6, 2011

Correlation

Correlation between EFT and DSM is 0.84 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.84

-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

EFT vs DSM dividend yield comparison.

Year	EFT	DSM
2026	2.78%	2.08%
2025	9.55%	4.07%
2024	10.52%	3.72%
2023	11.09%	4.27%
2022	9.81%	5.95%
2021	5.24%	4.31%
2020	5.88%	4.57%
2019	7.41%	5.19%
2018	6.77%	6.11%
2017	5.73%	5.82%
2016	5.54%	6.19%
2015	6.57%	6.17%
2014	5.82%	7.71%
2013	6.62%	7.68%
2012	5.62%	6.60%
2011	7.17%	6.56%
2010	5.85%	7.22%
2009	6.02%	6.09%
2008	15.12%	8.38%
2007	9.97%	6.37%
2006	8.47%	5.39%
2005	7.46%	7.15%
2004	2.45%	7.19%
2003	0.00%	6.90%
2002	0.00%	6.94%
2001	0.00%	6.67%
2000	0.00%	6.94%
1999	0.00%	1.36%