DSM vs ZECP

Comparison between BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund Inc (DSM, ETF) and ZACKS EARNINGS CONSISTENT PORTFOLIO ETF (ZECP, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceZECP has outperformed DSM, delivering a return of +9.3% compared to -1.5%

DSM vs ZECP - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	DSM(ETF)	ZECP(ETF)
Net Assets	$321M	$321M
Expense Ratio	N/A	0.55%
Max Drawdown	53.69%	21.86%
Sharpe Ratio	1.07	1.51
5Y Beta	0.19	0.74
P/E Ratio	N/A	26.19
Forward P/E	N/A	21.93
PEG Ratio	N/A	0.77
5Y Dividends CAGR	-4.74%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	N/A	16.71%
Debt to Equity	N/A	17.17%
P/S Ratio	N/A	2.71
P/B Ratio	N/A	5.74

Net Assets

DSM

$321M

Winner

ZECP

$321M

Expense Ratio

DSM

N/A

ZECP

0.55%

Max Drawdown

DSM

53.69%

Winner

ZECP

21.86%

Sharpe Ratio

DSM

1.07

Winner

ZECP

1.51

5Y Beta

Winner

DSM

0.19

ZECP

0.74

P/E Ratio

DSM

N/A

ZECP

26.19

Forward P/E

DSM

N/A

ZECP

21.93

PEG Ratio

DSM

N/A

ZECP

0.77

5Y Dividends CAGR

DSM

-4.74%

ZECP

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

DSM

N/A

ZECP

16.71%

Debt to Equity

DSM

N/A

ZECP

17.17%

P/S Ratio

DSM

N/A

ZECP

2.71

P/B Ratio

DSM

N/A

ZECP

5.74

DSM vs ZECP - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	DSM	ZECP
1 month	+0.42%	+1.88%
3 months	+1.29%	+5.48%
6 months	+3.50%	+6.17%
1 year	+14.94%	+21.43%
5 years(CAGR)	-1.46%	+9.29%
10 years(CAGR)	+1.25%	N/A
Max(CAGR)	+5.15%	+9.29%

DSM

+0.42%

Winner

ZECP

+1.88%

DSM

+1.29%

Winner

ZECP

+5.48%

DSM

+3.50%

Winner

ZECP

+6.17%

DSM

+14.94%

Winner

ZECP

+21.43%

5Y(CAGR)

DSM

-1.46%

Winner

ZECP

+9.29%

10Y(CAGR)

DSM

+1.25%

ZECP

N/A

Max(CAGR)

DSM

+5.15%

Winner

ZECP

+9.29%

DSM vs ZECP - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	DSM	ZECP
2026	+0.60%	+6.30%
2025	+10.70%	+15.51%
2024	+4.98%	+17.65%
2023	+3.00%	+14.19%
2022	-27.37%	-13.00%
2021	+11.90%	+7.75%
2020	+3.37%	N/A
2019	+18.05%	N/A
2018	-13.10%	N/A
2017	+12.39%	N/A
2016	+4.71%	N/A
2015	+7.30%	N/A
2014	+15.36%	N/A
2013	-16.99%	N/A
2012	+14.93%	N/A
2011	+24.19%	N/A
2010	+5.63%	N/A
2009	+45.32%	N/A
2008	-24.63%	N/A
2007	-13.34%	N/A
2006	+23.72%	N/A
2005	+1.31%	N/A
2004	+4.76%	N/A
2003	+18.37%	N/A
2002	+2.05%	N/A
2001	+3.76%	N/A
2000	+23.02%	N/A
1999	-6.54%	N/A

DSM vs ZECP Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for DSM was -49.10%, occurring on Oct 10, 2008. Recovery took 691 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for ZECP was -21.86%, occurring on Oct 12, 2022. Recovery took 518 trading sessions.

The current DSM drawdown is -11.86%. The current ZECP drawdown is -1.21%.

Rank	DSM	ZECP
#1	-49.10% May 4, 2007 - Feb 1, 2010	-21.86% Dec 29, 2021 - Jan 23, 2024
#2	-38.73% Aug 3, 2021 - Oct 25, 2023	-15.47% Jan 30, 2025 - Jul 2, 2025
#3	-31.97% Nov 6, 2019 - May 5, 2021	-8.32% Feb 9, 2026 - Apr 17, 2026
#4	-23.32% Jan 9, 2013 - Dec 21, 2015	-6.02% Nov 29, 2024 - Jan 30, 2025
#5	-17.18% Oct 1, 2010 - Aug 31, 2011	-5.99% Sep 3, 2021 - Oct 21, 2021
#6	-16.59% Aug 2, 2017 - May 9, 2019	-5.60% Jul 16, 2024 - Aug 20, 2024
#7	-16.42% Feb 18, 2004 - Nov 3, 2004	-4.52% Mar 28, 2024 - May 10, 2024
#8	-13.68% Jul 8, 2005 - Aug 16, 2006	-3.42% Nov 16, 2021 - Dec 7, 2021
#9	-12.71% Sep 30, 2002 - Mar 4, 2003	-2.88% Oct 18, 2024 - Nov 6, 2024
#10	-12.32% Nov 12, 1999 - Jan 28, 2000	-2.83% May 21, 2024 - Jun 17, 2024
#11	-12.03% Aug 13, 2001 - Jul 1, 2002	-2.81% Nov 12, 2025 - Nov 25, 2025
#12	-11.60% Sep 28, 2016 - Jul 12, 2017	-2.73% Aug 30, 2024 - Sep 16, 2024
#13	-11.55% Jun 16, 2003 - Jan 7, 2004	-2.46% Dec 15, 2021 - Dec 23, 2021
#14	-8.87% Jan 28, 2000 - Apr 4, 2000	-2.21% Oct 6, 2025 - Oct 20, 2025
#15	-7.89% Sep 30, 2011 - Dec 6, 2011	-2.11% Jul 25, 2025 - Aug 13, 2025

Correlation

Correlation between DSM and ZECP is 0.37 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.

0.37

-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

DSM vs ZECP dividend yield comparison.

Year	DSM	ZECP
2026	2.08%	0.00%
2025	4.07%	0.79%
2024	3.72%	0.63%
2023	4.27%	0.73%
2022	5.95%	0.91%
2021	4.31%	0.11%
2020	4.57%	0.00%
2019	5.19%	0.00%
2018	6.11%	0.00%
2017	5.82%	0.00%
2016	6.19%	0.00%
2015	6.17%	0.00%
2014	7.71%	0.00%
2013	7.68%	0.00%
2012	6.60%	0.00%
2011	6.56%	0.00%
2010	7.22%	0.00%
2009	6.09%	0.00%
2008	8.38%	0.00%
2007	6.37%	0.00%
2006	5.39%	0.00%
2005	7.15%	0.00%
2004	7.19%	0.00%
2003	6.90%	0.00%
2002	6.94%	0.00%
2001	6.67%	0.00%
2000	6.94%	0.00%
1999	1.36%	0.00%