DSM vs EFT

Comparison between BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund Inc (DSM, ETF) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceEFT has outperformed DSM, delivering a return of +3.4% compared to -1.5%

DSM vs EFT - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	DSM(ETF)	EFT(ETF)
Net Assets	$321M	$321M
Max Drawdown	53.69%	66.40%
Sharpe Ratio	1.07	-0.85
5Y Beta	0.19	0.41
5Y Dividends CAGR	-4.74%	8.43%

Net Assets

DSM

$321M

EFT

$321M

Max Drawdown

Winner

DSM

53.69%

EFT

66.40%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

DSM

1.07

EFT

-0.85

5Y Beta

Winner

DSM

0.19

EFT

0.41

5Y Dividends CAGR

DSM

-4.74%

Winner

EFT

8.43%

DSM vs EFT - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	DSM	EFT
1 month	+0.42%	-1.20%
3 months	+1.29%	+0.02%
6 months	+3.50%	-2.20%
1 year	+14.94%	-4.58%
5 years(CAGR)	-1.46%	+3.40%
10 years(CAGR)	+1.25%	+5.31%
Max(CAGR)	+5.15%	+4.59%

Winner

DSM

+0.42%

EFT

-1.20%

Winner

DSM

+1.29%

EFT

+0.02%

Winner

DSM

+3.50%

EFT

-2.20%

Winner

DSM

+14.94%

EFT

-4.58%

5Y(CAGR)

DSM

-1.46%

Winner

EFT

+3.40%

10Y(CAGR)

DSM

+1.25%

Winner

EFT

+5.31%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

DSM

+5.15%

EFT

+4.59%

DSM vs EFT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	DSM	EFT
2026	+0.60%	-1.64%
2025	+10.70%	-4.98%
2024	+4.98%	+10.09%
2023	+3.00%	+25.67%
2022	-27.37%	-19.37%
2021	+11.90%	+21.84%
2020	+3.37%	+2.02%
2019	+18.05%	+15.47%
2018	-13.10%	-6.38%
2017	+12.39%	+1.03%
2016	+4.71%	+26.83%
2015	+7.30%	-3.08%
2014	+15.36%	-3.45%
2013	-16.99%	-6.56%
2012	+14.93%	+25.50%
2011	+24.19%	-5.17%
2010	+5.63%	+19.50%
2009	+45.32%	+82.60%
2008	-24.63%	-44.31%
2007	-13.34%	-8.04%
2006	+23.72%	+17.88%
2005	+1.31%	-5.07%
2004	+4.76%	-2.51%
2003	+18.37%	N/A
2002	+2.05%	N/A
2001	+3.76%	N/A
2000	+23.02%	N/A
1999	-6.54%	N/A

DSM vs EFT Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for DSM was -49.10%, occurring on Oct 10, 2008. Recovery took 691 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for EFT was -60.58%, occurring on Dec 15, 2008. Recovery took 675 trading sessions.

The current DSM drawdown is -11.86%. The current EFT drawdown is -11.04%.

Rank	DSM	EFT
#1	-49.10% May 4, 2007 - Feb 1, 2010	-60.58% Jun 25, 2007 - Mar 1, 2010
#2	-38.73% Aug 3, 2021 - Oct 25, 2023	-45.43% Jan 22, 2020 - Dec 3, 2020
#3	-31.97% Nov 6, 2019 - May 5, 2021	-24.97% Jan 12, 2022 - Dec 15, 2023
#4	-23.32% Jan 9, 2013 - Dec 21, 2015	-23.47% May 23, 2013 - Nov 11, 2016
#5	-17.18% Oct 1, 2010 - Aug 31, 2011	-20.16% Feb 24, 2011 - Mar 21, 2012
#6	-16.59% Aug 2, 2017 - May 9, 2019	-17.49% Jan 24, 2025 - Apr 7, 2025
#7	-16.42% Feb 18, 2004 - Nov 3, 2004	-15.52% Apr 12, 2018 - Dec 16, 2019
#8	-13.68% Jul 8, 2005 - Aug 16, 2006	-13.57% Mar 25, 2010 - Oct 21, 2010
#9	-12.71% Sep 30, 2002 - Mar 4, 2003	-10.39% Mar 4, 2005 - Mar 16, 2006
#10	-12.32% Nov 12, 1999 - Jan 28, 2000	-9.92% Mar 27, 2012 - Aug 20, 2012
#11	-12.03% Aug 13, 2001 - Jul 1, 2002	-7.83% Oct 25, 2012 - Dec 19, 2012
#12	-11.60% Sep 28, 2016 - Jul 12, 2017	-6.75% Jul 27, 2017 - Mar 14, 2018
#13	-11.55% Jun 16, 2003 - Jan 7, 2004	-5.95% Oct 4, 2012 - Oct 25, 2012
#14	-8.87% Jan 28, 2000 - Apr 4, 2000	-5.70% Jul 23, 2024 - Nov 7, 2024
#15	-7.89% Sep 30, 2011 - Dec 6, 2011	-5.63% Sep 10, 2021 - Jan 10, 2022

Correlation

Correlation between DSM and EFT is 0.84 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.84

-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

DSM vs EFT dividend yield comparison.

Year	DSM	EFT
2026	2.08%	2.78%
2025	4.07%	9.55%
2024	3.72%	10.52%
2023	4.27%	11.09%
2022	5.95%	9.81%
2021	4.31%	5.24%
2020	4.57%	5.88%
2019	5.19%	7.41%
2018	6.11%	6.77%
2017	5.82%	5.73%
2016	6.19%	5.54%
2015	6.17%	6.57%
2014	7.71%	5.82%
2013	7.68%	6.62%
2012	6.60%	5.62%
2011	6.56%	7.17%
2010	7.22%	5.85%
2009	6.09%	6.02%
2008	8.38%	15.12%
2007	6.37%	9.97%
2006	5.39%	8.47%
2005	7.15%	7.46%
2004	7.19%	2.45%
2003	6.90%	0.00%
2002	6.94%	0.00%
2001	6.67%	0.00%
2000	6.94%	0.00%
1999	1.36%	0.00%