CTSH vs SQM
Comparison between Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp - Class A (CTSH, Company) and Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM, Company).
CTSH is from the Technology sector, while SQM is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceSQM has outperformed CTSH, delivering a return of +12.5% compared to -7.6%
CTSH vs SQM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CTSH vs SQM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CTSH vs SQM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CTSH | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -46.48% | +0.53% |
| 2025 | +10.38% | +91.19% |
| 2024 | +5.04% | -38.56% |
| 2023 | +33.43% | -15.40% |
| 2022 | -35.16% | +70.49% |
| 2021 | +13.13% | +2.60% |
| 2020 | +34.18% | +87.42% |
| 2019 | -0.47% | -27.79% |
| 2018 | -9.57% | -35.04% |
| 2017 | +26.47% | +113.53% |
| 2016 | -3.61% | +61.04% |
| 2015 | +13.95% | -20.43% |
| 2014 | +6.56% | -1.99% |
| 2013 | +32.62% | -54.46% |
| 2012 | +12.42% | +7.62% |
| 2011 | -14.66% | -7.72% |
| 2010 | +56.60% | +53.00% |
| 2009 | +137.08% | +51.16% |
| 2008 | -43.97% | +46.55% |
| 2007 | -12.71% | +33.91% |
| 2006 | +52.28% | +23.39% |
| 2005 | +20.18% | +82.30% |
| 2004 | +79.90% | +52.01% |
| 2003 | +89.51% | +94.94% |
| 2002 | +88.30% | -8.87% |
| 2001 | +23.70% | +19.25% |
| 2000 | -24.36% | -10.37% |
| 1999 | +114.82% | +9.77% |
CTSH vs SQM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CTSH was -71.38%, occurring on Oct 8, 2001. Recovery took 653 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for SQM was -78.36%, occurring on Jul 27, 2015. Recovery took 1547 trading sessions.
The current CTSH drawdown is -51.27%. The current SQM drawdown is -29.40%.
| Rank | CTSH | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -71.38% Mar 28, 2000 - Nov 4, 2002 | -78.36% Jul 22, 2011 - Sep 14, 2017 |
| #2 | -69.06% Feb 7, 2007 - Jan 13, 2010 | -73.00% Jan 11, 2018 - Jan 6, 2021 |
| #3 | -56.12% Feb 14, 2025 - Jun 30, 2026 | -72.14% Jun 18, 2008 - Nov 4, 2010 |
| #4 | -49.77% Mar 15, 2018 - May 3, 2021 | -69.81% Sep 14, 2022 - Jun 2, 2025 |
| #5 | -43.77% Mar 22, 2022 - Feb 13, 2025 | -35.54% Feb 4, 2000 - May 17, 2002 |
| #6 | -35.68% Dec 22, 1999 - Feb 8, 2000 | -31.32% Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 21, 2006 |
| #7 | -34.31% Apr 29, 2011 - Sep 18, 2013 | -30.96% Jan 12, 2021 - Nov 2, 2021 |
| #8 | -31.60% Oct 28, 2015 - Jul 20, 2017 | -29.41% Nov 22, 2021 - Feb 15, 2022 |
| #9 | -30.65% Dec 23, 2002 - Jul 2, 2003 | -27.46% Oct 21, 2003 - Aug 26, 2004 |
| #10 | -28.10% Jan 23, 2004 - Sep 9, 2004 | -26.31% May 27, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022 |
| #11 | -25.36% Mar 9, 2000 - Mar 24, 2000 | -26.31% Oct 11, 2007 - Feb 27, 2008 |
| #12 | -19.21% Mar 7, 2014 - Nov 7, 2014 | -24.67% May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2003 |
| #13 | -18.87% May 3, 2021 - Nov 12, 2021 | -19.95% Jul 2, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007 |
| #14 | -17.85% Mar 4, 2005 - Jun 15, 2005 | -19.89% Apr 4, 2022 - May 17, 2022 |
| #15 | -17.00% Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 9, 2000 | -19.15% Aug 15, 2022 - Sep 14, 2022 |
Correlation
Correlation between CTSH and SQM is 0.73 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
CTSH vs SQM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CTSH | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.53% | 1.49% |
| 2025 | 1.49% | 0.18% |
| 2024 | 1.56% | 0.59% |
| 2023 | 1.54% | 8.34% |
| 2022 | 1.89% | 9.66% |
| 2021 | 1.08% | 3.92% |
| 2020 | 1.07% | 1.64% |
| 2019 | 1.29% | 4.55% |
| 2018 | 1.26% | 5.37% |
| 2017 | 0.63% | 2.73% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 4.77% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 2.00% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 4.71% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 3.21% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 1.69% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 1.40% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 0.87% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 2.70% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 3.71% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 2.01% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 1.76% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 1.49% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 1.21% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 1.20% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 1.88% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 2.16% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 42.10% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks