SQM vs LEN
Comparison between Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM, Company) and Lennar Corp - Class A (LEN, Company).
SQM is from the Basic Materials sector, while LEN is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.
5-Year PerformanceSQM has outperformed LEN, delivering a return of +18.2% compared to +0.4%
SQM vs LEN - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
SQM vs LEN - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
SQM vs LEN - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | SQM | LEN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +15.57% | -13.07% |
| 2025 | +91.19% | -19.60% |
| 2024 | -38.56% | -6.32% |
| 2023 | -15.40% | +64.24% |
| 2022 | +70.49% | -17.55% |
| 2021 | +2.60% | +58.06% |
| 2020 | +87.42% | +37.95% |
| 2019 | -27.79% | +40.05% |
| 2018 | -35.04% | -39.44% |
| 2017 | +113.53% | +50.31% |
| 2016 | +61.04% | -7.76% |
| 2015 | -20.43% | +10.79% |
| 2014 | -1.99% | +14.14% |
| 2013 | -54.46% | -0.37% |
| 2012 | +7.62% | +95.54% |
| 2011 | -7.72% | +4.09% |
| 2010 | +53.00% | +45.57% |
| 2009 | +51.16% | +41.40% |
| 2008 | +46.55% | -47.89% |
| 2007 | +33.91% | -63.98% |
| 2006 | +23.39% | -15.37% |
| 2005 | +82.30% | +10.05% |
| 2004 | +52.01% | +22.26% |
| 2003 | +94.94% | +95.97% |
| 2002 | -8.87% | +11.43% |
| 2001 | +19.25% | +33.44% |
| 2000 | -10.37% | +127.96% |
| 1999 | +9.77% | -2.56% |
SQM vs LEN Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for SQM was -78.36%, occurring on Jul 27, 2015. Recovery took 1547 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for LEN was -94.28%, occurring on Nov 21, 2008. Recovery took 3101 trading sessions.
The current SQM drawdown is -18.84%. The current LEN drawdown is -50.39%.
| Rank | SQM | LEN |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -78.36% Jul 22, 2011 - Sep 14, 2017 | -94.28% Jul 28, 2005 - Nov 20, 2017 |
| #2 | -73.00% Jan 11, 2018 - Jan 6, 2021 | -58.81% Jan 19, 2018 - Jul 22, 2020 |
| #3 | -72.14% Jun 18, 2008 - Nov 4, 2010 | -54.50% Sep 19, 2024 - May 15, 2026 |
| #4 | -69.81% Sep 14, 2022 - Jun 2, 2025 | -44.35% Dec 10, 2021 - May 3, 2023 |
| #5 | -35.54% Feb 4, 2000 - May 17, 2002 | -33.47% Jul 19, 2001 - Jan 17, 2002 |
| #6 | -31.32% Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 21, 2006 | -30.12% Jul 1, 2002 - May 9, 2003 |
| #7 | -30.96% Jan 12, 2021 - Nov 2, 2021 | -26.62% Mar 16, 2004 - Dec 15, 2004 |
| #8 | -29.41% Nov 22, 2021 - Feb 15, 2022 | -22.39% Jul 14, 2023 - Dec 6, 2023 |
| #9 | -27.46% Oct 21, 2003 - Aug 26, 2004 | -21.38% Apr 27, 2001 - Jul 11, 2001 |
| #10 | -26.31% May 27, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022 | -19.26% Mar 31, 2000 - Jul 5, 2000 |
| #11 | -26.31% Oct 11, 2007 - Feb 27, 2008 | -19.12% Jun 16, 2003 - Sep 30, 2003 |
| #12 | -24.67% May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2003 | -18.75% Feb 25, 2005 - Jun 16, 2005 |
| #13 | -19.95% Jul 2, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007 | -17.63% Dec 11, 2000 - Jan 10, 2001 |
| #14 | -19.89% Apr 4, 2022 - May 17, 2022 | -17.06% Oct 15, 2020 - Jan 25, 2021 |
| #15 | -19.15% Aug 15, 2022 - Sep 14, 2022 | -16.58% Mar 28, 2024 - Jul 19, 2024 |
Correlation
Correlation between SQM and LEN is 0.64 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
SQM vs LEN dividend yield comparison.
| Year | SQM | LEN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.29% | 1.11% |
| 2025 | 0.18% | 1.95% |
| 2024 | 0.59% | 1.47% |
| 2023 | 8.34% | 1.01% |
| 2022 | 9.66% | 1.66% |
| 2021 | 3.92% | 0.86% |
| 2020 | 1.64% | 0.82% |
| 2019 | 4.55% | 0.29% |
| 2018 | 5.37% | 0.41% |
| 2017 | 2.73% | 0.25% |
| 2016 | 4.77% | 0.37% |
| 2015 | 2.00% | 0.33% |
| 2014 | 4.71% | 0.36% |
| 2013 | 3.21% | 0.40% |
| 2012 | 1.69% | 0.41% |
| 2011 | 1.40% | 0.81% |
| 2010 | 0.87% | 0.85% |
| 2009 | 2.70% | 1.25% |
| 2008 | 3.71% | 6.00% |
| 2007 | 2.01% | 3.58% |
| 2006 | 1.76% | 1.22% |
| 2005 | 1.49% | 0.94% |
| 2004 | 1.21% | 0.90% |
| 2003 | 1.20% | 5.77% |
| 2002 | 1.88% | 0.10% |
| 2001 | 2.16% | 0.11% |
| 2000 | 42.10% | 0.14% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.08% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks