CTSH vs BEP
Comparison between Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp - Class A (CTSH, Company) and Brookfield Renewable Partners LP (BEP, Company).
CTSH is from the Technology sector, while BEP is from the Utilities sector.
5-Year PerformanceBEP has outperformed CTSH, delivering a return of +1.8% compared to -7.6%
CTSH vs BEP - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CTSH vs BEP - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CTSH vs BEP - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CTSH | BEP |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -46.48% | +21.28% |
| 2025 | +10.38% | +23.85% |
| 2024 | +5.04% | -7.33% |
| 2023 | +33.43% | +6.57% |
| 2022 | -35.16% | -26.60% |
| 2021 | +13.13% | -15.87% |
| 2020 | +34.18% | +84.05% |
| 2019 | -0.47% | +87.72% |
| 2018 | -9.57% | -20.95% |
| 2017 | +26.47% | +27.50% |
| 2016 | -3.61% | +24.01% |
| 2015 | +13.95% | -11.43% |
| 2014 | +6.56% | +23.95% |
| 2013 | +32.62% | -8.10% |
| 2012 | +12.42% | +11.06% |
| 2011 | -14.66% | +28.08% |
| 2010 | +56.60% | +74.08% |
| 2009 | +137.08% | +57.43% |
| 2008 | -43.97% | -27.47% |
| 2007 | -12.71% | +39.04% |
| 2006 | +52.28% | +18.81% |
| 2005 | +20.18% | +24.13% |
| 2004 | +79.90% | N/A |
| 2003 | +89.51% | N/A |
| 2002 | +88.30% | N/A |
| 2001 | +23.70% | N/A |
| 2000 | -24.36% | N/A |
| 1999 | +114.82% | N/A |
CTSH vs BEP Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CTSH was -71.38%, occurring on Oct 8, 2001. Recovery took 653 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for BEP was -53.83%, occurring on Oct 3, 2023. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current CTSH drawdown is -51.27%. The current BEP drawdown is -12.45%.
| Rank | CTSH | BEP |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -71.38% Mar 28, 2000 - Nov 4, 2002 | -53.83% Jan 22, 2021 - Oct 3, 2023 |
| #2 | -69.06% Feb 7, 2007 - Jan 13, 2010 | -45.44% Feb 19, 2020 - Jul 17, 2020 |
| #3 | -56.12% Feb 14, 2025 - Jun 30, 2026 | -37.27% Aug 28, 2008 - Oct 6, 2009 |
| #4 | -49.77% Mar 15, 2018 - May 3, 2021 | -32.14% Apr 16, 2015 - Jul 29, 2016 |
| #5 | -43.77% Mar 22, 2022 - Feb 13, 2025 | -25.77% Sep 8, 2017 - May 24, 2019 |
| #6 | -35.68% Dec 22, 1999 - Feb 8, 2000 | -19.98% Dec 31, 2007 - Aug 28, 2008 |
| #7 | -34.31% Apr 29, 2011 - Sep 18, 2013 | -19.32% May 1, 2013 - May 7, 2014 |
| #8 | -31.60% Oct 28, 2015 - Jul 20, 2017 | -17.08% Sep 18, 2006 - Dec 19, 2006 |
| #9 | -30.65% Dec 23, 2002 - Jul 2, 2003 | -16.67% Apr 8, 2010 - Oct 13, 2010 |
| #10 | -28.10% Jan 23, 2004 - Sep 9, 2004 | -16.48% Oct 27, 2011 - Jul 13, 2012 |
| #11 | -25.36% Mar 9, 2000 - Mar 24, 2000 | -15.16% Sep 6, 2016 - Apr 11, 2017 |
| #12 | -19.21% Mar 7, 2014 - Nov 7, 2014 | -15.06% Jul 21, 2011 - Sep 13, 2011 |
| #13 | -18.87% May 3, 2021 - Nov 12, 2021 | -13.77% Nov 7, 2007 - Dec 31, 2007 |
| #14 | -17.85% Mar 4, 2005 - Jun 15, 2005 | -12.08% Nov 25, 2014 - Jan 16, 2015 |
| #15 | -17.00% Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 9, 2000 | -11.58% May 3, 2011 - Jul 20, 2011 |
Correlation
Correlation between CTSH and BEP is 0.80 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2005 - 2026)
CTSH vs BEP dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CTSH | BEP |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.53% | 2.37% |
| 2025 | 1.49% | 5.53% |
| 2024 | 1.56% | 6.23% |
| 2023 | 1.54% | 5.14% |
| 2022 | 1.89% | 5.05% |
| 2021 | 1.08% | 4.42% |
| 2020 | 1.07% | 2.68% |
| 2019 | 1.29% | 4.42% |
| 2018 | 1.26% | 7.57% |
| 2017 | 0.63% | 5.36% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 5.99% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 6.34% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 5.43% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 5.54% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 2.36% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 47.37% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 10.93% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 15.31% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 9.79% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 12.67% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 6.44% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks