SQM vs RS
Comparison between Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM, Company) and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Company (RS, Company).
Both SQM and RS are from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceRS has outperformed SQM, delivering a return of +23.2% compared to +12.5%
SQM vs RS - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
SQM vs RS - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
SQM vs RS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | SQM | RS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +0.53% | +34.70% |
| 2025 | +91.19% | +10.18% |
| 2024 | -38.56% | -2.94% |
| 2023 | -15.40% | +41.03% |
| 2022 | +70.49% | +27.77% |
| 2021 | +2.60% | +37.87% |
| 2020 | +87.42% | +2.94% |
| 2019 | -27.79% | +71.47% |
| 2018 | -35.04% | -17.17% |
| 2017 | +113.53% | +9.28% |
| 2016 | +61.04% | +41.61% |
| 2015 | -20.43% | -3.20% |
| 2014 | -1.99% | -16.92% |
| 2013 | -54.46% | +19.59% |
| 2012 | +7.62% | +25.07% |
| 2011 | -7.72% | -5.20% |
| 2010 | +53.00% | +13.02% |
| 2009 | +51.16% | +101.98% |
| 2008 | +46.55% | -62.21% |
| 2007 | +33.91% | +39.17% |
| 2006 | +23.39% | +25.76% |
| 2005 | +82.30% | +62.01% |
| 2004 | +52.01% | +13.83% |
| 2003 | +94.94% | +60.05% |
| 2002 | -8.87% | -17.86% |
| 2001 | +19.25% | +9.80% |
| 2000 | -10.37% | +11.52% |
| 1999 | +9.77% | +6.22% |
SQM vs RS Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for SQM was -78.36%, occurring on Jul 27, 2015. Recovery took 1547 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for RS was -83.80%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 1312 trading sessions.
The current SQM drawdown is -29.40%. The current RS drawdown is -4.34%.
| Rank | SQM | RS |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -78.36% Jul 22, 2011 - Sep 14, 2017 | -83.80% Jul 1, 2008 - Sep 17, 2013 |
| #2 | -73.00% Jan 11, 2018 - Jan 6, 2021 | -59.67% May 8, 2002 - Dec 18, 2003 |
| #3 | -72.14% Jun 18, 2008 - Nov 4, 2010 | -40.79% Jan 17, 2020 - Nov 16, 2020 |
| #4 | -69.81% Sep 14, 2022 - Jun 2, 2025 | -39.90% May 9, 2006 - Apr 2, 2007 |
| #5 | -35.54% Feb 4, 2000 - May 17, 2002 | -31.95% May 9, 2007 - Apr 8, 2008 |
| #6 | -31.32% Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 21, 2006 | -29.89% Feb 13, 2001 - Apr 10, 2002 |
| #7 | -30.96% Jan 12, 2021 - Nov 2, 2021 | -29.80% Jan 10, 2014 - Apr 13, 2016 |
| #8 | -29.41% Nov 22, 2021 - Feb 15, 2022 | -27.20% Jun 6, 2018 - Jun 28, 2019 |
| #9 | -27.46% Oct 21, 2003 - Aug 26, 2004 | -25.99% Nov 30, 1999 - Nov 27, 2000 |
| #10 | -26.31% May 27, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022 | -25.68% Mar 4, 2005 - Aug 2, 2005 |
| #11 | -26.31% Oct 11, 2007 - Feb 27, 2008 | -22.34% May 4, 2022 - Nov 22, 2022 |
| #12 | -24.67% May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2003 | -22.29% Jul 23, 2025 - Feb 4, 2026 |
| #13 | -19.95% Jul 2, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007 | -21.76% Apr 5, 2024 - Jul 18, 2025 |
| #14 | -19.89% Apr 4, 2022 - May 17, 2022 | -21.74% Dec 29, 2003 - Mar 30, 2004 |
| #15 | -19.15% Aug 15, 2022 - Sep 14, 2022 | -20.25% May 7, 2021 - Feb 25, 2022 |
Correlation
Correlation between SQM and RS is 0.79 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
SQM vs RS dividend yield comparison.
| Year | SQM | RS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.49% | 0.63% |
| 2025 | 0.18% | 1.66% |
| 2024 | 0.59% | 1.63% |
| 2023 | 8.34% | 1.43% |
| 2022 | 9.66% | 1.73% |
| 2021 | 3.92% | 1.70% |
| 2020 | 1.64% | 2.09% |
| 2019 | 4.55% | 1.84% |
| 2018 | 5.37% | 2.81% |
| 2017 | 2.73% | 2.10% |
| 2016 | 4.77% | 2.07% |
| 2015 | 2.00% | 2.76% |
| 2014 | 4.71% | 2.28% |
| 2013 | 3.21% | 1.66% |
| 2012 | 1.69% | 1.29% |
| 2011 | 1.40% | 0.99% |
| 2010 | 0.87% | 0.78% |
| 2009 | 2.70% | 0.93% |
| 2008 | 3.71% | 2.01% |
| 2007 | 2.01% | 0.59% |
| 2006 | 1.76% | 0.56% |
| 2005 | 1.49% | 0.62% |
| 2004 | 1.21% | 0.67% |
| 2003 | 1.20% | 0.72% |
| 2002 | 1.88% | 1.15% |
| 2001 | 2.16% | 0.91% |
| 2000 | 42.10% | 0.97% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.21% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks