SQM vs CTSH
Comparison between Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM, Company) and Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp - Class A (CTSH, Company).
SQM is from the Basic Materials sector, while CTSH is from the Technology sector.
5-Year PerformanceSQM has outperformed CTSH, delivering a return of +11.5% compared to -6.9%
SQM vs CTSH - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
SQM vs CTSH - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
SQM vs CTSH - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | SQM | CTSH |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -0.16% | -45.71% |
| 2025 | +91.19% | +10.38% |
| 2024 | -38.56% | +5.04% |
| 2023 | -15.40% | +33.43% |
| 2022 | +70.49% | -35.16% |
| 2021 | +2.60% | +13.13% |
| 2020 | +87.42% | +34.18% |
| 2019 | -27.79% | -0.47% |
| 2018 | -35.04% | -9.57% |
| 2017 | +113.53% | +26.47% |
| 2016 | +61.04% | -3.61% |
| 2015 | -20.43% | +13.95% |
| 2014 | -1.99% | +6.56% |
| 2013 | -54.46% | +32.62% |
| 2012 | +7.62% | +12.42% |
| 2011 | -7.72% | -14.66% |
| 2010 | +53.00% | +56.60% |
| 2009 | +51.16% | +137.08% |
| 2008 | +46.55% | -43.97% |
| 2007 | +33.91% | -12.71% |
| 2006 | +23.39% | +52.28% |
| 2005 | +82.30% | +20.18% |
| 2004 | +52.01% | +79.90% |
| 2003 | +94.94% | +89.51% |
| 2002 | -8.87% | +88.30% |
| 2001 | +19.25% | +23.70% |
| 2000 | -10.37% | -24.36% |
| 1999 | +9.77% | +114.82% |
SQM vs CTSH Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for SQM was -78.36%, occurring on Jul 27, 2015. Recovery took 1547 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CTSH was -71.38%, occurring on Oct 8, 2001. Recovery took 653 trading sessions.
The current SQM drawdown is -29.89%. The current CTSH drawdown is -50.56%.
| Rank | SQM | CTSH |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -78.36% Jul 22, 2011 - Sep 14, 2017 | -71.38% Mar 28, 2000 - Nov 4, 2002 |
| #2 | -73.00% Jan 11, 2018 - Jan 6, 2021 | -69.06% Feb 7, 2007 - Jan 13, 2010 |
| #3 | -72.14% Jun 18, 2008 - Nov 4, 2010 | -56.12% Feb 14, 2025 - Jun 30, 2026 |
| #4 | -69.81% Sep 14, 2022 - Jun 2, 2025 | -49.77% Mar 15, 2018 - May 3, 2021 |
| #5 | -35.54% Feb 4, 2000 - May 17, 2002 | -43.77% Mar 22, 2022 - Feb 13, 2025 |
| #6 | -31.32% Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 21, 2006 | -35.68% Dec 22, 1999 - Feb 8, 2000 |
| #7 | -30.96% Jan 12, 2021 - Nov 2, 2021 | -34.31% Apr 29, 2011 - Sep 18, 2013 |
| #8 | -29.41% Nov 22, 2021 - Feb 15, 2022 | -31.60% Oct 28, 2015 - Jul 20, 2017 |
| #9 | -27.46% Oct 21, 2003 - Aug 26, 2004 | -30.65% Dec 23, 2002 - Jul 2, 2003 |
| #10 | -26.31% May 27, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022 | -28.10% Jan 23, 2004 - Sep 9, 2004 |
| #11 | -26.31% Oct 11, 2007 - Feb 27, 2008 | -25.36% Mar 9, 2000 - Mar 24, 2000 |
| #12 | -24.67% May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2003 | -19.21% Mar 7, 2014 - Nov 7, 2014 |
| #13 | -19.95% Jul 2, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007 | -18.87% May 3, 2021 - Nov 12, 2021 |
| #14 | -19.89% Apr 4, 2022 - May 17, 2022 | -17.85% Mar 4, 2005 - Jun 15, 2005 |
| #15 | -19.15% Aug 15, 2022 - Sep 14, 2022 | -17.00% Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 9, 2000 |
Correlation
Correlation between SQM and CTSH is 0.73 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
SQM vs CTSH dividend yield comparison.
| Year | SQM | CTSH |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.50% | 1.51% |
| 2025 | 0.18% | 1.49% |
| 2024 | 0.59% | 1.56% |
| 2023 | 8.34% | 1.54% |
| 2022 | 9.66% | 1.89% |
| 2021 | 3.92% | 1.08% |
| 2020 | 1.64% | 1.07% |
| 2019 | 4.55% | 1.29% |
| 2018 | 5.37% | 1.26% |
| 2017 | 2.73% | 0.63% |
| 2016 | 4.77% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 2.00% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 4.71% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 3.21% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 1.69% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 1.40% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 0.87% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 2.70% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 3.71% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 2.01% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 1.76% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 1.49% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 1.21% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 1.20% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 1.88% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 2.16% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 42.10% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks