SQM vs BEP
Comparison between Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM, Company) and Brookfield Renewable Partners LP (BEP, Company).
SQM is from the Basic Materials sector, while BEP is from the Utilities sector.
5-Year PerformanceSQM has outperformed BEP, delivering a return of +11.5% compared to +1.4%
SQM vs BEP - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
SQM vs BEP - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
SQM vs BEP - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | SQM | BEP |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -0.16% | +17.82% |
| 2025 | +91.19% | +23.85% |
| 2024 | -38.56% | -7.33% |
| 2023 | -15.40% | +6.57% |
| 2022 | +70.49% | -26.60% |
| 2021 | +2.60% | -15.87% |
| 2020 | +87.42% | +84.05% |
| 2019 | -27.79% | +87.72% |
| 2018 | -35.04% | -20.95% |
| 2017 | +113.53% | +27.50% |
| 2016 | +61.04% | +24.01% |
| 2015 | -20.43% | -11.43% |
| 2014 | -1.99% | +23.95% |
| 2013 | -54.46% | -8.10% |
| 2012 | +7.62% | +11.06% |
| 2011 | -7.72% | +28.08% |
| 2010 | +53.00% | +74.08% |
| 2009 | +51.16% | +57.43% |
| 2008 | +46.55% | -27.47% |
| 2007 | +33.91% | +39.04% |
| 2006 | +23.39% | +18.81% |
| 2005 | +82.30% | +24.13% |
| 2004 | +52.01% | N/A |
| 2003 | +94.94% | N/A |
| 2002 | -8.87% | N/A |
| 2001 | +19.25% | N/A |
| 2000 | -10.37% | N/A |
| 1999 | +9.77% | N/A |
SQM vs BEP Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for SQM was -78.36%, occurring on Jul 27, 2015. Recovery took 1547 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for BEP was -53.83%, occurring on Oct 3, 2023. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current SQM drawdown is -29.89%. The current BEP drawdown is -14.95%.
| Rank | SQM | BEP |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -78.36% Jul 22, 2011 - Sep 14, 2017 | -53.83% Jan 22, 2021 - Oct 3, 2023 |
| #2 | -73.00% Jan 11, 2018 - Jan 6, 2021 | -45.44% Feb 19, 2020 - Jul 17, 2020 |
| #3 | -72.14% Jun 18, 2008 - Nov 4, 2010 | -37.27% Aug 28, 2008 - Oct 6, 2009 |
| #4 | -69.81% Sep 14, 2022 - Jun 2, 2025 | -32.14% Apr 16, 2015 - Jul 29, 2016 |
| #5 | -35.54% Feb 4, 2000 - May 17, 2002 | -25.77% Sep 8, 2017 - May 24, 2019 |
| #6 | -31.32% Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 21, 2006 | -19.98% Dec 31, 2007 - Aug 28, 2008 |
| #7 | -30.96% Jan 12, 2021 - Nov 2, 2021 | -19.32% May 1, 2013 - May 7, 2014 |
| #8 | -29.41% Nov 22, 2021 - Feb 15, 2022 | -17.08% Sep 18, 2006 - Dec 19, 2006 |
| #9 | -27.46% Oct 21, 2003 - Aug 26, 2004 | -16.67% Apr 8, 2010 - Oct 13, 2010 |
| #10 | -26.31% May 27, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022 | -16.48% Oct 27, 2011 - Jul 13, 2012 |
| #11 | -26.31% Oct 11, 2007 - Feb 27, 2008 | -15.16% Sep 6, 2016 - Apr 11, 2017 |
| #12 | -24.67% May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2003 | -15.06% Jul 21, 2011 - Sep 13, 2011 |
| #13 | -19.95% Jul 2, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007 | -13.77% Nov 7, 2007 - Dec 31, 2007 |
| #14 | -19.89% Apr 4, 2022 - May 17, 2022 | -12.08% Nov 25, 2014 - Jan 16, 2015 |
| #15 | -19.15% Aug 15, 2022 - Sep 14, 2022 | -11.58% May 3, 2011 - Jul 20, 2011 |
Correlation
Correlation between SQM and BEP is 0.76 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
SQM vs BEP dividend yield comparison.
| Year | SQM | BEP |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.50% | 2.44% |
| 2025 | 0.18% | 5.53% |
| 2024 | 0.59% | 6.23% |
| 2023 | 8.34% | 5.14% |
| 2022 | 9.66% | 5.05% |
| 2021 | 3.92% | 4.42% |
| 2020 | 1.64% | 2.68% |
| 2019 | 4.55% | 4.42% |
| 2018 | 5.37% | 7.57% |
| 2017 | 2.73% | 5.36% |
| 2016 | 4.77% | 5.99% |
| 2015 | 2.00% | 6.34% |
| 2014 | 4.71% | 5.43% |
| 2013 | 3.21% | 5.54% |
| 2012 | 1.69% | 2.36% |
| 2011 | 1.40% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 0.87% | 47.37% |
| 2009 | 2.70% | 10.93% |
| 2008 | 3.71% | 15.31% |
| 2007 | 2.01% | 9.79% |
| 2006 | 1.76% | 12.67% |
| 2005 | 1.49% | 6.44% |
| 2004 | 1.21% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 1.20% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 1.88% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 2.16% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 42.10% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks