SQM vs TSN
Comparison between Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM, Company) and Tyson Foods Inc - Class A (TSN, Company).
SQM is from the Basic Materials sector, while TSN is from the Consumer Defensive sector.
5-Year PerformanceSQM has outperformed TSN, delivering a return of +11.5% compared to -1.4%
SQM vs TSN - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
SQM vs TSN - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
SQM vs TSN - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | SQM | TSN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -0.16% | -0.09% |
| 2025 | +91.19% | +4.34% |
| 2024 | -38.56% | +6.89% |
| 2023 | -15.40% | -12.31% |
| 2022 | +70.49% | -27.42% |
| 2021 | +2.60% | +40.54% |
| 2020 | +87.42% | -26.47% |
| 2019 | -27.79% | +74.04% |
| 2018 | -35.04% | -32.44% |
| 2017 | +113.53% | +31.35% |
| 2016 | +61.04% | +17.68% |
| 2015 | -20.43% | +34.84% |
| 2014 | -1.99% | +21.85% |
| 2013 | -54.46% | +68.86% |
| 2012 | +7.62% | -3.08% |
| 2011 | -7.72% | +26.79% |
| 2010 | +53.00% | +42.03% |
| 2009 | +51.16% | +33.17% |
| 2008 | +46.55% | -41.26% |
| 2007 | +33.91% | -5.43% |
| 2006 | +23.39% | -0.51% |
| 2005 | +82.30% | -4.19% |
| 2004 | +52.01% | +40.91% |
| 2003 | +94.94% | +16.90% |
| 2002 | -8.87% | +0.73% |
| 2001 | +19.25% | -0.86% |
| 2000 | -10.37% | -19.42% |
| 1999 | +9.77% | +3.41% |
SQM vs TSN Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for SQM was -78.36%, occurring on Jul 27, 2015. Recovery took 1547 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for TSN was -81.51%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 1414 trading sessions.
The current SQM drawdown is -29.89%. The current TSN drawdown is -33.52%.
| Rank | SQM | TSN |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -78.36% Jul 22, 2011 - Sep 14, 2017 | -81.51% Jun 21, 2007 - Feb 1, 2013 |
| #2 | -73.00% Jan 11, 2018 - Jan 6, 2021 | -57.58% Nov 18, 1999 - Feb 5, 2004 |
| #3 | -72.14% Jun 18, 2008 - Nov 4, 2010 | -52.44% Jan 13, 2020 - Jan 4, 2022 |
| #4 | -69.81% Sep 14, 2022 - Jun 2, 2025 | -52.09% Feb 7, 2022 - Oct 23, 2023 |
| #5 | -35.54% Feb 4, 2000 - May 17, 2002 | -38.10% Dec 8, 2017 - May 14, 2019 |
| #6 | -31.32% Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 21, 2006 | -37.61% Jul 15, 2004 - Apr 16, 2007 |
| #7 | -30.96% Jan 12, 2021 - Nov 2, 2021 | -26.54% Sep 22, 2016 - Nov 14, 2017 |
| #8 | -29.41% Nov 22, 2021 - Feb 15, 2022 | -19.98% Mar 31, 2014 - Jun 23, 2015 |
| #9 | -27.46% Oct 21, 2003 - Aug 26, 2004 | -16.93% Sep 3, 2019 - Jan 13, 2020 |
| #10 | -26.31% May 27, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022 | -13.53% May 10, 2016 - Jul 13, 2016 |
| #11 | -26.31% Oct 11, 2007 - Feb 27, 2008 | -13.26% Aug 13, 2013 - Nov 22, 2013 |
| #12 | -24.67% May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2003 | -12.22% Feb 5, 2004 - Mar 8, 2004 |
| #13 | -19.95% Jul 2, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007 | -11.69% Jun 24, 2015 - Oct 5, 2015 |
| #14 | -19.89% Apr 4, 2022 - May 17, 2022 | -9.15% Oct 23, 2015 - Nov 23, 2015 |
| #15 | -19.15% Aug 15, 2022 - Sep 14, 2022 | -7.94% Apr 12, 2016 - May 10, 2016 |
Correlation
Correlation between SQM and TSN is 0.70 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
SQM vs TSN dividend yield comparison.
| Year | SQM | TSN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.50% | 1.79% |
| 2025 | 0.18% | 3.43% |
| 2024 | 0.59% | 3.43% |
| 2023 | 8.34% | 3.59% |
| 2022 | 9.66% | 2.99% |
| 2021 | 3.92% | 2.06% |
| 2020 | 1.64% | 2.65% |
| 2019 | 4.55% | 1.70% |
| 2018 | 5.37% | 2.39% |
| 2017 | 2.73% | 1.11% |
| 2016 | 4.77% | 1.09% |
| 2015 | 2.00% | 0.84% |
| 2014 | 4.71% | 0.81% |
| 2013 | 3.21% | 0.67% |
| 2012 | 1.69% | 1.39% |
| 2011 | 1.40% | 0.78% |
| 2010 | 0.87% | 0.93% |
| 2009 | 2.70% | 1.30% |
| 2008 | 3.71% | 1.83% |
| 2007 | 2.01% | 1.04% |
| 2006 | 1.76% | 0.97% |
| 2005 | 1.49% | 0.94% |
| 2004 | 1.21% | 0.87% |
| 2003 | 1.20% | 1.21% |
| 2002 | 1.88% | 1.43% |
| 2001 | 2.16% | 1.39% |
| 2000 | 42.10% | 1.25% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.25% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks