SQM vs BCH
Comparison between Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM, Company) and Banco de Chile (BCH, Company).
SQM is from the Basic Materials sector, while BCH is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceBCH has outperformed SQM, delivering a return of +27.5% compared to +15.2%
SQM vs BCH - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
SQM vs BCH - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
SQM vs BCH - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | SQM | BCH |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +18.86% | +17.23% |
| 2025 | +91.19% | +82.52% |
| 2024 | -38.56% | +6.83% |
| 2023 | -15.40% | +29.66% |
| 2022 | +70.49% | +36.18% |
| 2021 | +2.60% | -22.16% |
| 2020 | +87.42% | -2.22% |
| 2019 | -27.79% | -25.04% |
| 2018 | -35.04% | -10.32% |
| 2017 | +113.53% | +46.06% |
| 2016 | +61.04% | +27.81% |
| 2015 | -20.43% | -7.53% |
| 2014 | -1.99% | -7.39% |
| 2013 | -54.46% | -2.95% |
| 2012 | +7.62% | +22.89% |
| 2011 | -7.72% | -2.71% |
| 2010 | +53.00% | +69.31% |
| 2009 | +51.16% | +83.04% |
| 2008 | +46.55% | -26.05% |
| 2007 | +33.91% | -2.48% |
| 2006 | +23.39% | +39.58% |
| 2005 | +82.30% | +11.35% |
| 2004 | +52.01% | +42.38% |
| 2003 | +94.94% | +81.09% |
| 2002 | -8.87% | -19.22% |
| 2001 | +19.25% | N/A |
| 2000 | -10.37% | N/A |
| 1999 | +9.77% | N/A |
SQM vs BCH Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for SQM was -78.36%, occurring on Jul 27, 2015. Recovery took 1547 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for BCH was -57.70%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 1564 trading sessions.
The current SQM drawdown is -16.53%. The current BCH drawdown is -3.38%.
| Rank | SQM | BCH |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -78.36% Jul 22, 2011 - Sep 14, 2017 | -57.70% Feb 23, 2018 - May 13, 2024 |
| #2 | -73.00% Jan 11, 2018 - Jan 6, 2021 | -57.63% Mar 18, 2008 - Nov 13, 2009 |
| #3 | -72.14% Jun 18, 2008 - Nov 4, 2010 | -28.39% Sep 18, 2013 - Mar 16, 2017 |
| #4 | -69.81% Sep 14, 2022 - Jun 2, 2025 | -27.46% Mar 15, 2002 - Apr 16, 2003 |
| #5 | -35.54% Feb 4, 2000 - May 17, 2002 | -26.16% Jul 18, 2011 - Jan 20, 2012 |
| #6 | -31.32% Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 21, 2006 | -20.23% Feb 18, 2004 - Jul 16, 2004 |
| #7 | -30.96% Jan 12, 2021 - Nov 2, 2021 | -20.20% Jan 8, 2002 - Mar 15, 2002 |
| #8 | -29.41% Nov 22, 2021 - Feb 15, 2022 | -19.96% Feb 3, 2026 - May 13, 2026 |
| #9 | -27.46% Oct 21, 2003 - Aug 26, 2004 | -19.32% Jun 29, 2007 - Jan 31, 2008 |
| #10 | -26.31% May 27, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022 | -15.56% Oct 10, 2017 - Dec 18, 2017 |
| #11 | -26.31% Oct 11, 2007 - Feb 27, 2008 | -15.38% Mar 20, 2012 - Dec 11, 2012 |
| #12 | -24.67% May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2003 | -14.58% Jan 20, 2010 - Mar 4, 2010 |
| #13 | -19.95% Jul 2, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007 | -14.50% Oct 22, 2003 - Jan 9, 2004 |
| #14 | -19.89% Apr 4, 2022 - May 17, 2022 | -14.36% Feb 13, 2013 - Sep 18, 2013 |
| #15 | -19.15% Aug 15, 2022 - Sep 14, 2022 | -13.79% May 14, 2025 - Oct 15, 2025 |
Correlation
Correlation between SQM and BCH is 0.75 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
SQM vs BCH dividend yield comparison.
| Year | SQM | BCH |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.26% | 5.18% |
| 2025 | 0.18% | 5.54% |
| 2024 | 0.59% | 7.46% |
| 2023 | 8.34% | 9.01% |
| 2022 | 9.66% | 6.39% |
| 2021 | 3.92% | 3.76% |
| 2020 | 1.64% | 3.95% |
| 2019 | 4.55% | 5.04% |
| 2018 | 5.37% | 3.55% |
| 2017 | 2.73% | 2.20% |
| 2016 | 4.77% | 3.32% |
| 2015 | 2.00% | 4.35% |
| 2014 | 4.71% | 11.94% |
| 2013 | 3.21% | 6.00% |
| 2012 | 1.69% | 4.58% |
| 2011 | 1.40% | 5.61% |
| 2010 | 0.87% | 3.52% |
| 2009 | 2.70% | 5.92% |
| 2008 | 3.71% | 10.98% |
| 2007 | 2.01% | 6.32% |
| 2006 | 1.76% | 4.95% |
| 2005 | 1.49% | 4.52% |
| 2004 | 1.21% | 3.78% |
| 2003 | 1.20% | 1.72% |
| 2002 | 1.88% | 1.88% |
| 2001 | 2.16% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 42.10% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks