StockComparison Logo
vs

SQM vs LYB

Comparison between Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM, Company) and LyondellBasell Industries NV - Class A (LYB, Company).

Both SQM and LYB are from the Basic Materials sector.

5-Year PerformanceSQM has outperformed LYB, delivering a return of +15.6% compared to -4.0%

SQM vs LYB - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
SQM
$21B
LYB
$21B
Max Drawdown
SQM
80.45%
Winner
LYB
71.27%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
SQM
1.89
LYB
0.41
5Y Beta
SQM
1.05
Winner
LYB
0.78
Industry
SQM
Specialty Chemicals
LYB
Specialty Chemicals
P/E Ratio
SQM
25.93
Winner
LYB
-26.54
Forward P/E
SQM
11.11
Winner
LYB
7.99
PEG Ratio
Winner
SQM
0.73
LYB
1.53
Dividend Yield
SQM
1.36%
Winner
LYB
7.37%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
SQM
15.24%
LYB
5.50%
5Y EPS CAGR
SQM
32.32%
LYB
N/A
Debt to Equity
SQM
87.35%
Winner
LYB
2.25%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
SQM
5.10%
LYB
4.32%
P/S Ratio
SQM
4.08
Winner
LYB
0.69
P/B Ratio
SQM
3.69
Winner
LYB
2.05

SQM vs LYB - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
SQM
-13.89%
Winner
LYB
-12.77%
3M
Winner
SQM
+4.50%
LYB
-4.80%
6M
SQM
+25.33%
Winner
LYB
+43.88%
1Y
Winner
SQM
+139.68%
LYB
+11.85%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
SQM
+15.61%
LYB
-4.02%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
SQM
+17.39%
LYB
+5.05%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
SQM
+17.98%
LYB
+14.26%

SQM vs LYB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearSQMLYB
2026+16.66%+46.21%
2025+91.19%-34.63%
2024-38.56%-18.65%
2023-15.40%+19.30%
2022+70.49%-1.84%
2021+2.60%+7.81%
2020+87.42%+3.25%
2019-27.79%+39.13%
2018-35.04%-23.00%
2017+113.53%+32.01%
2016+61.04%+2.56%
2015-20.43%+12.25%
2014-1.99%+3.67%
2013-54.46%+39.64%
2012+7.62%+86.98%
2011-7.72%+9.90%
2010+53.00%+56.36%
2009+51.16%N/A
2008+46.55%N/A
2007+33.91%N/A
2006+23.39%N/A
2005+82.30%N/A
2004+52.01%N/A
2003+94.94%N/A
2002-8.87%N/A
2001+19.25%N/A
2000-10.37%N/A
1999+9.77%N/A

SQM vs LYB Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for SQM was -78.36%, occurring on Jul 27, 2015. Recovery took 1547 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for LYB was -63.26%, occurring on Mar 16, 2020. Recovery took 289 trading sessions.

The current SQM drawdown is -18.07%. The current LYB drawdown is -29.63%.

RankSQMLYB
#1-78.36%
Jul 22, 2011 - Sep 14, 2017
-63.26%
Nov 7, 2019 - Dec 31, 2020
#2-73.00%
Jan 11, 2018 - Jan 6, 2021
-55.33%
Apr 3, 2024 - Nov 6, 2025
#3-72.14%
Jun 18, 2008 - Nov 4, 2010
-46.74%
May 2, 2011 - Jan 17, 2012
#4-69.81%
Sep 14, 2022 - Jun 2, 2025
-37.90%
Sep 5, 2014 - Oct 30, 2017
#5-35.54%
Feb 4, 2000 - May 17, 2002
-34.83%
Jun 7, 2022 - Mar 27, 2024
#6-31.32%
Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 21, 2006
-34.78%
Apr 29, 2010 - Sep 27, 2010
#7-30.96%
Jan 12, 2021 - Nov 2, 2021
-32.83%
Jan 26, 2018 - Nov 4, 2019
#8-29.41%
Nov 22, 2021 - Feb 15, 2022
-25.84%
Jun 3, 2021 - May 4, 2022
#9-27.46%
Oct 21, 2003 - Aug 26, 2004
-18.77%
Feb 13, 2012 - Aug 3, 2012
#10-26.31%
May 27, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022
-15.15%
Mar 20, 2013 - May 16, 2013
#11-26.31%
Oct 11, 2007 - Feb 27, 2008
-13.56%
Jan 12, 2021 - Feb 19, 2021
#12-24.67%
May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2003
-12.88%
Oct 17, 2012 - Dec 7, 2012
#13-19.95%
Jul 2, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007
-9.75%
Jan 31, 2013 - Mar 8, 2013
#14-19.89%
Apr 4, 2022 - May 17, 2022
-8.96%
May 4, 2022 - May 27, 2022
#15-19.15%
Aug 15, 2022 - Sep 14, 2022
-8.47%
Jan 15, 2014 - Feb 13, 2014

Correlation

Correlation between SQM and LYB is 0.52 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.52
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

SQM vs LYB dividend yield comparison.

YearSQMLYB
20261.28%2.17%
20250.18%12.59%
20240.59%7.10%
20238.34%5.20%
20229.66%11.92%
20213.92%4.81%
20201.64%4.58%
20194.55%20.27%
20185.37%4.81%
20172.73%3.22%
20164.77%3.88%
20152.00%3.50%
20144.71%3.40%
20133.21%2.49%
20121.69%7.36%
20111.40%15.54%
20100.87%0.00%
20092.70%0.00%
20083.71%0.00%
20072.01%0.00%
20061.76%0.00%
20051.49%0.00%
20041.21%0.00%
20031.20%0.00%
20021.88%0.00%
20012.16%0.00%
200042.10%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare