SMID vs USBC

Comparison between Smith-Midland Corp (SMID, Company) and USBC Inc (USBC, Company).

SMID is from the Basic Materials sector, while USBC is from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformanceSMID has outperformed USBC, delivering a return of +8.7% compared to -67.0%

SMID vs USBC - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	SMID(COMPANY)	USBC(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$162M	$162M
Max Drawdown	72.37%	100.00%
Sharpe Ratio	0.28	-1.06
5Y Beta	1.60	-1.06
Industry	Building Materials	Scientific & Technical Instruments
P/E Ratio	19.75	-3.27
Forward P/E	17.01	N/A
PEG Ratio	0.06	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	31.01%	-19.44%
Debt to Equity	0.00%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	2.22%	-7.85%

Market Cap

SMID

$162M

Winner

USBC

$162M

Max Drawdown

Winner

SMID

72.37%

USBC

100.00%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

SMID

0.28

USBC

-1.06

5Y Beta

SMID

1.60

Winner

USBC

-1.06

Industry

SMID

Building Materials

USBC

Scientific & Technical Instruments

P/E Ratio

SMID

19.75

Winner

USBC

-3.27

Forward P/E

SMID

17.01

USBC

N/A

PEG Ratio

SMID

0.06

USBC

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

Winner

SMID

31.01%

USBC

-19.44%

Debt to Equity

SMID

0.00%

USBC

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

SMID

2.22%

USBC

-7.85%

SMID vs USBC - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	SMID	USBC
1 month	+0.69%	-5.47%
3 months	+7.77%	+13.11%
6 months	-15.81%	-40.27%
1 year	+3.25%	-78.43%
5 years(CAGR)	+8.70%	-67.01%
10 years(CAGR)	+28.70%	-43.21%
Max(CAGR)	+24.31%	-37.82%

Winner

SMID

+0.69%

USBC

-5.47%

SMID

+7.77%

Winner

USBC

+13.11%

Winner

SMID

-15.81%

USBC

-40.27%

Winner

SMID

+3.25%

USBC

-78.43%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

SMID

+8.70%

USBC

-67.01%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

SMID

+28.70%

USBC

-43.21%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

SMID

+24.31%

USBC

-37.82%

SMID vs USBC - Annual Returns (2006 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	SMID	USBC
2026	-18.62%	-36.16%
2025	-17.45%	-92.11%
2024	+12.93%	-67.80%
2023	+93.34%	-64.90%
2022	-44.05%	-8.44%
2021	+405.45%	-23.42%
2020	+54.92%	+4.09%
2019	-18.49%	+86.27%
2018	+9.35%	+337.14%
2017	+30.22%	-70.00%
2016	+66.47%	-90.26%
2015	N/A	-48.98%
2014	N/A	+22.09%
2013	N/A	-12.94%
2012	N/A	+19.84%
2011	N/A	-81.43%
2010	N/A	+357.14%
2009	N/A	+133.33%
2008	N/A	-61.11%
2007	N/A	-90.20%
2006	N/A	-49.50%

SMID vs USBC Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for SMID was -72.37%, occurring on Jul 6, 2022. Recovery took 734 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for USBC was -100.00%, occurring on Jun 3, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current SMID drawdown is -39.02%. The current USBC drawdown is -99.99%.

Rank	SMID	USBC
#1	-72.37% Dec 28, 2021 - Nov 27, 2024	-100.00% May 2, 2006 - Jun 3, 2026
#2	-53.84% Jan 31, 2018 - Jan 13, 2021	-12.61% Apr 20, 2006 - May 2, 2006
#3	-48.85% Dec 2, 2024 - Apr 8, 2025	N/A
#4	-47.04% Jul 14, 2021 - Nov 17, 2021	N/A
#5	-30.91% Jan 7, 2016 - Aug 26, 2016	N/A
#6	-25.33% Oct 5, 2017 - Jan 18, 2018	N/A
#7	-19.88% May 12, 2017 - Oct 5, 2017	N/A
#8	-15.70% Mar 15, 2021 - May 11, 2021	N/A
#9	-15.43% Nov 30, 2021 - Dec 14, 2021	N/A
#10	-12.39% Mar 3, 2021 - Mar 15, 2021	N/A
#11	-10.43% Feb 22, 2017 - Mar 31, 2017	N/A
#12	-10.38% Jun 1, 2021 - Jun 7, 2021	N/A
#13	-9.60% Aug 26, 2016 - Dec 1, 2016	N/A
#14	-8.27% Nov 19, 2021 - Nov 29, 2021	N/A
#15	-5.33% Jan 26, 2021 - Feb 16, 2021	N/A

Correlation

Correlation between SMID and USBC is -0.42 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.

-0.42

-101