USBC vs EDAP

Comparison between USBC Inc (USBC, Company) and EDAP TMS S.A. (EDAP, Company).

USBC is from the Technology sector, while EDAP is from the Healthcare sector.

5-Year PerformanceEDAP has outperformed USBC, delivering a return of -8.5% compared to -67.0%

USBC vs EDAP - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	USBC(COMPANY)	EDAP(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$162M	$162M
Max Drawdown	100.00%	95.38%
Sharpe Ratio	-1.06	1.41
5Y Beta	-1.06	0.73
Industry	Scientific & Technical Instruments	Medical Distribution
P/E Ratio	-3.27	-4.70
Forward P/E	N/A	38.91
PEG Ratio	N/A	-0.06
5Y EPS CAGR	-19.44%	N/A
Debt to Equity	0.00%	11.18%
Free Cash Flow Yield	-7.85%	-8.71%

Market Cap

Winner

USBC

$162M

EDAP

$162M

Max Drawdown

USBC

100.00%

Winner

EDAP

95.38%

Sharpe Ratio

USBC

-1.06

Winner

EDAP

1.41

5Y Beta

Winner

USBC

-1.06

EDAP

0.73

Industry

USBC

Scientific & Technical Instruments

EDAP

Medical Distribution

P/E Ratio

USBC

-3.27

Winner

EDAP

-4.70

Forward P/E

USBC

N/A

EDAP

38.91

PEG Ratio

USBC

N/A

EDAP

-0.06

5Y EPS CAGR

USBC

-19.44%

EDAP

N/A

Debt to Equity

Winner

USBC

0.00%

EDAP

11.18%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

USBC

-7.85%

EDAP

-8.71%

USBC vs EDAP - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	USBC	EDAP
1 month	-5.47%	+30.51%
3 months	+13.11%	+5.37%
6 months	-40.27%	+80.00%
1 year	-78.43%	+141.34%
5 years(CAGR)	-67.01%	-8.54%
10 years(CAGR)	-43.21%	+2.13%
Max(CAGR)	-37.82%	+4.40%

USBC

-5.47%

Winner

EDAP

+30.51%

Winner

USBC

+13.11%

EDAP

+5.37%

USBC

-40.27%

Winner

EDAP

+80.00%

USBC

-78.43%

Winner

EDAP

+141.34%

5Y(CAGR)

USBC

-67.01%

Winner

EDAP

-8.54%

10Y(CAGR)

USBC

-43.21%

Winner

EDAP

+2.13%

Max(CAGR)

USBC

-37.82%

Winner

EDAP

+4.40%

USBC vs EDAP - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	USBC	EDAP
2026	-36.16%	+27.06%
2025	-92.11%	+37.08%
2024	-67.80%	-58.38%
2023	-64.90%	-49.43%
2022	-8.44%	+86.04%
2021	-23.42%	+16.99%
2020	+4.09%	+16.44%
2019	+86.27%	+136.90%
2018	+337.14%	-35.29%
2017	-70.00%	-14.07%
2016	-90.26%	-17.38%
2015	-48.98%	+68.57%
2014	+22.09%	-20.48%
2013	-12.94%	+40.48%
2012	+19.84%	+22.16%
2011	-81.43%	-66.53%
2010	+357.14%	+111.24%
2009	+133.33%	+65.66%
2008	-61.11%	-70.00%
2007	-90.20%	-16.67%
2006	-49.50%	+7.28%
2005	N/A	+50.80%
2004	N/A	+109.94%
2003	N/A	+49.17%
2002	N/A	-46.67%
2001	N/A	+201.33%
2000	N/A	-35.00%
1999	N/A	+0.00%

USBC vs EDAP Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for USBC was -100.00%, occurring on Jun 3, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for EDAP was -95.38%, occurring on Apr 21, 2009. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current USBC drawdown is -99.99%. The current EDAP drawdown is -79.20%.

Rank	USBC	EDAP
#1	-100.00% May 2, 2006 - Jun 3, 2026	-95.38% Mar 30, 2006 - Apr 21, 2009
#2	-12.61% Apr 20, 2006 - May 2, 2006	-79.17% Feb 14, 2000 - May 25, 2001
#3	N/A	-64.06% May 25, 2001 - Apr 28, 2004
#4	N/A	-53.57% Nov 16, 1999 - Jan 31, 2000
#5	N/A	-48.13% Apr 28, 2004 - Dec 28, 2004
#6	N/A	-35.23% Feb 1, 2005 - Dec 30, 2005
#7	N/A	-30.93% Feb 1, 2000 - Feb 14, 2000
#8	N/A	-16.67% Nov 4, 1999 - Nov 16, 1999
#9	N/A	-15.76% Jan 23, 2006 - Feb 28, 2006
#10	N/A	-7.82% Jan 9, 2006 - Jan 11, 2006
#11	N/A	-6.86% Mar 6, 2006 - Mar 10, 2006
#12	N/A	-6.58% Dec 31, 2004 - Jan 14, 2005
#13	N/A	-5.49% Mar 14, 2006 - Mar 16, 2006
#14	N/A	-4.70% Mar 17, 2006 - Mar 22, 2006
#15	N/A	-3.01% Dec 30, 2005 - Jan 4, 2006