SMID vs EDAP

Comparison between Smith-Midland Corp (SMID, Company) and EDAP TMS S.A. (EDAP, Company).

SMID is from the Basic Materials sector, while EDAP is from the Healthcare sector.

5-Year PerformanceSMID has outperformed EDAP, delivering a return of +8.7% compared to -8.5%

SMID vs EDAP - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	SMID(COMPANY)	EDAP(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$162M	$162M
Max Drawdown	72.37%	95.38%
Sharpe Ratio	0.28	1.41
5Y Beta	1.60	0.73
Industry	Building Materials	Medical Distribution
P/E Ratio	19.75	-4.70
Forward P/E	17.01	38.91
PEG Ratio	0.06	-0.06
5Y EPS CAGR	31.01%	N/A
Debt to Equity	0.00%	11.18%
Free Cash Flow Yield	2.22%	-8.71%

Market Cap

Winner

SMID

$162M

EDAP

$162M

Max Drawdown

Winner

SMID

72.37%

EDAP

95.38%

Sharpe Ratio

SMID

0.28

Winner

EDAP

1.41

5Y Beta

SMID

1.60

Winner

EDAP

0.73

Industry

SMID

Building Materials

EDAP

Medical Distribution

P/E Ratio

SMID

19.75

Winner

EDAP

-4.70

Forward P/E

Winner

SMID

17.01

EDAP

38.91

PEG Ratio

SMID

0.06

Winner

EDAP

-0.06

5Y EPS CAGR

SMID

31.01%

EDAP

N/A

Debt to Equity

Winner

SMID

0.00%

EDAP

11.18%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

SMID

2.22%

EDAP

-8.71%

SMID vs EDAP - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	SMID	EDAP
1 month	+0.69%	+30.51%
3 months	+7.77%	+5.37%
6 months	-15.81%	+80.00%
1 year	+3.25%	+141.34%
5 years(CAGR)	+8.70%	-8.54%
10 years(CAGR)	+28.70%	+2.13%
Max(CAGR)	+24.31%	+4.40%

SMID

+0.69%

Winner

EDAP

+30.51%

Winner

SMID

+7.77%

EDAP

+5.37%

SMID

-15.81%

Winner

EDAP

+80.00%

SMID

+3.25%

Winner

EDAP

+141.34%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

SMID

+8.70%

EDAP

-8.54%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

SMID

+28.70%

EDAP

+2.13%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

SMID

+24.31%

EDAP

+4.40%

SMID vs EDAP - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	SMID	EDAP
2026	-18.62%	+27.06%
2025	-17.45%	+37.08%
2024	+12.93%	-58.38%
2023	+93.34%	-49.43%
2022	-44.05%	+86.04%
2021	+405.45%	+16.99%
2020	+54.92%	+16.44%
2019	-18.49%	+136.90%
2018	+9.35%	-35.29%
2017	+30.22%	-14.07%
2016	+66.47%	-17.38%
2015	N/A	+68.57%
2014	N/A	-20.48%
2013	N/A	+40.48%
2012	N/A	+22.16%
2011	N/A	-66.53%
2010	N/A	+111.24%
2009	N/A	+65.66%
2008	N/A	-70.00%
2007	N/A	-16.67%
2006	N/A	+7.28%
2005	N/A	+50.80%
2004	N/A	+109.94%
2003	N/A	+49.17%
2002	N/A	-46.67%
2001	N/A	+201.33%
2000	N/A	-35.00%
1999	N/A	+0.00%

SMID vs EDAP Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for SMID was -72.37%, occurring on Jul 6, 2022. Recovery took 734 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for EDAP was -95.38%, occurring on Apr 21, 2009. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current SMID drawdown is -39.02%. The current EDAP drawdown is -79.20%.

Rank	SMID	EDAP
#1	-72.37% Dec 28, 2021 - Nov 27, 2024	-95.38% Mar 30, 2006 - Apr 21, 2009
#2	-53.84% Jan 31, 2018 - Jan 13, 2021	-79.17% Feb 14, 2000 - May 25, 2001
#3	-48.85% Dec 2, 2024 - Apr 8, 2025	-64.06% May 25, 2001 - Apr 28, 2004
#4	-47.04% Jul 14, 2021 - Nov 17, 2021	-53.57% Nov 16, 1999 - Jan 31, 2000
#5	-30.91% Jan 7, 2016 - Aug 26, 2016	-48.13% Apr 28, 2004 - Dec 28, 2004
#6	-25.33% Oct 5, 2017 - Jan 18, 2018	-35.23% Feb 1, 2005 - Dec 30, 2005
#7	-19.88% May 12, 2017 - Oct 5, 2017	-30.93% Feb 1, 2000 - Feb 14, 2000
#8	-15.70% Mar 15, 2021 - May 11, 2021	-16.67% Nov 4, 1999 - Nov 16, 1999
#9	-15.43% Nov 30, 2021 - Dec 14, 2021	-15.76% Jan 23, 2006 - Feb 28, 2006
#10	-12.39% Mar 3, 2021 - Mar 15, 2021	-7.82% Jan 9, 2006 - Jan 11, 2006
#11	-10.43% Feb 22, 2017 - Mar 31, 2017	-6.86% Mar 6, 2006 - Mar 10, 2006
#12	-10.38% Jun 1, 2021 - Jun 7, 2021	-6.58% Dec 31, 2004 - Jan 14, 2005
#13	-9.60% Aug 26, 2016 - Dec 1, 2016	-5.49% Mar 14, 2006 - Mar 16, 2006
#14	-8.27% Nov 19, 2021 - Nov 29, 2021	-4.70% Mar 17, 2006 - Mar 22, 2006
#15	-5.33% Jan 26, 2021 - Feb 16, 2021	-3.01% Dec 30, 2005 - Jan 4, 2006