StockComparison Logo
vs

RGR vs CIVB

Comparison between Sturm Ruger & Co. Inc (RGR, Company) and Civista Bancshares Inc (CIVB, Company).

RGR is from the Industrials sector, while CIVB is from the Financial Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceCIVB has outperformed RGR, delivering a return of +8.1% compared to -9.2%

RGR vs CIVB - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
RGR
$603M
Winner
CIVB
$606M
Max Drawdown
Winner
RGR
79.69%
CIVB
90.89%
Sharpe Ratio
RGR
0.31
Winner
CIVB
1.65
5Y Beta
Winner
RGR
0.43
CIVB
0.63
Industry
RGR
Aerospace & Defense
CIVB
Banks - Regional
P/E Ratio
Winner
RGR
-74.40
CIVB
10.52
Forward P/E
Winner
RGR
8.61
CIVB
9.53
PEG Ratio
Winner
RGR
0.00
CIVB
0.33
Dividend Yield
RGR
0.78%
Winner
CIVB
2.39%
5Y Dividends CAGR
RGR
-40.89%
Winner
CIVB
8.76%
5Y EPS CAGR
RGR
N/A
CIVB
18.98%
Debt to Equity
RGR
0.00%
CIVB
0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield
RGR
7.85%
Winner
CIVB
8.34%
P/S Ratio
Winner
RGR
1.09
CIVB
3.31
P/B Ratio
RGR
2.16
Winner
CIVB
1.07

RGR vs CIVB - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
RGR
-1.20%
Winner
CIVB
+0.21%
3M
RGR
-13.64%
Winner
CIVB
+16.75%
6M
RGR
+1.80%
Winner
CIVB
+22.21%
1Y
RGR
+9.99%
Winner
CIVB
+54.00%
5Y(CAGR)
RGR
-9.20%
Winner
CIVB
+8.13%
10Y(CAGR)
RGR
-2.32%
Winner
CIVB
+10.24%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
RGR
+9.79%
CIVB
+4.60%

RGR vs CIVB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearRGRCIVB
2026+11.59%+34.77%
2025-4.76%+12.54%
2024-20.21%+19.02%
2023-10.53%-11.16%
2022-16.59%-8.50%
2021+6.13%+41.05%
2020+49.71%-25.07%
2019-11.43%+43.00%
2018-4.81%-19.48%
2017+7.12%+15.14%
2016-11.80%+66.47%
2015+74.22%+28.12%
2014-51.68%+59.93%
2013+65.20%+23.96%
2012+48.44%+32.89%
2011+125.49%+1.56%
2010+52.64%-14.41%
2009+58.94%-23.15%
2008-28.76%-53.83%
2007-13.75%-24.22%
2006+36.75%+6.60%
2005-17.66%-14.43%
2004-18.33%-16.04%
2003+24.84%+22.69%
2002-13.76%+13.73%
2001+37.95%+14.08%
2000+15.29%N/A
1999+0.86%N/A

RGR vs CIVB Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for RGR was -79.69%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 912 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CIVB was -87.15%, occurring on Oct 7, 2011. Recovery took 3458 trading sessions.

The current RGR drawdown is -48.99%. The current CIVB drawdown is -0.82%.

RankRGRCIVB
#1-79.69%
Aug 7, 2007 - Mar 21, 2011
-87.15%
Apr 28, 2003 - Feb 3, 2017
#2-60.65%
Jun 30, 2021 - Nov 20, 2025
-53.27%
Jun 6, 2018 - Jun 7, 2021
#3-58.67%
Jan 16, 2014 - Jun 30, 2020
-42.06%
Nov 23, 2021 - May 2, 2025
#4-57.09%
Apr 7, 2004 - Mar 20, 2007
-24.00%
Oct 12, 2001 - Aug 22, 2002
#5-39.73%
May 28, 2002 - Feb 10, 2004
-22.85%
Jul 3, 2025 - Feb 4, 2026
#6-38.89%
May 2, 2012 - Nov 27, 2012
-21.11%
Jan 31, 2001 - Jul 9, 2001
#7-30.68%
Aug 30, 2011 - Jan 5, 2012
-16.43%
Feb 14, 2017 - Oct 10, 2017
#8-28.36%
May 24, 2000 - Jan 4, 2001
-11.49%
Feb 5, 2026 - Apr 24, 2026
#9-28.07%
Aug 10, 2020 - Jun 21, 2021
-11.33%
Nov 29, 2017 - Mar 6, 2018
#10-26.29%
Nov 29, 2012 - Feb 8, 2013
-11.27%
Oct 10, 2017 - Nov 29, 2017
#11-20.72%
Apr 29, 2011 - Jul 22, 2011
-9.89%
Jun 7, 2021 - Aug 11, 2021
#12-19.15%
Mar 4, 2013 - Sep 10, 2013
-8.45%
Aug 27, 2001 - Oct 9, 2001
#13-15.98%
Jan 19, 2000 - May 24, 2000
-8.42%
May 15, 2025 - Jul 2, 2025
#14-15.73%
Oct 15, 2001 - Mar 4, 2002
-7.97%
Mar 7, 2018 - May 22, 2018
#15-15.51%
Jan 16, 2001 - Sep 24, 2001
-7.21%
Aug 11, 2021 - Oct 5, 2021

Correlation

Correlation between RGR and CIVB is 0.50 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.

0.50
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

RGR vs CIVB dividend yield comparison.

YearRGRCIVB
20260.51%1.24%
20251.90%3.06%
20241.95%3.04%
20232.79%3.31%
202214.66%2.54%
20214.94%2.13%
202010.00%2.51%
20191.74%1.75%
20182.07%1.84%
20172.44%1.14%
20163.28%1.13%
20151.85%1.56%
20144.68%1.85%
20132.91%2.30%
201212.76%2.29%
20111.29%0.74%
20102.16%0.00%
20093.14%5.38%
20080.00%15.19%
20070.00%7.97%
20060.00%5.69%
20054.28%5.74%
20046.64%4.63%
20037.04%3.67%
20028.36%5.48%
20016.68%4.66%
20008.47%0.00%
19992.25%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare