REG vs UNM
Comparison between Regency Centers Corporation (REG, Company) and Unum Group (UNM, Company).
REG is from the Real Estate sector, while UNM is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceUNM has outperformed REG, delivering a return of +28.9% compared to +7.7%
REG vs UNM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
REG vs UNM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
REG vs UNM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | REG | UNM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +20.40% | +21.51% |
| 2025 | -0.47% | +8.70% |
| 2024 | +13.64% | +64.57% |
| 2023 | +11.18% | +15.86% |
| 2022 | -14.43% | +68.61% |
| 2021 | +76.50% | +16.16% |
| 2020 | -22.17% | -17.67% |
| 2019 | +15.09% | +0.31% |
| 2018 | -12.47% | -45.20% |
| 2017 | +3.68% | +26.17% |
| 2016 | +4.86% | +37.36% |
| 2015 | +8.28% | -2.19% |
| 2014 | +43.56% | +3.48% |
| 2013 | +0.93% | +66.69% |
| 2012 | +30.58% | -1.07% |
| 2011 | -8.58% | -13.80% |
| 2010 | +27.69% | +23.35% |
| 2009 | -14.96% | +7.88% |
| 2008 | -23.06% | -19.23% |
| 2007 | -15.07% | +15.94% |
| 2006 | +34.12% | -8.85% |
| 2005 | +12.54% | +32.04% |
| 2004 | +46.48% | +13.71% |
| 2003 | +30.43% | -11.11% |
| 2002 | +27.97% | -32.10% |
| 2001 | +26.98% | +6.71% |
| 2000 | +29.81% | -9.50% |
| 1999 | +4.86% | +2.63% |
REG vs UNM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for REG was -73.31%, occurring on Mar 6, 2009. Recovery took 1983 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for UNM was -81.88%, occurring on Mar 11, 2003. Recovery took 3347 trading sessions.
The current REG drawdown is -0.10%.
| Rank | REG | UNM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -73.31% Feb 7, 2007 - Dec 22, 2014 | -81.88% Nov 19, 1999 - Mar 14, 2013 |
| #2 | -57.05% Aug 1, 2016 - Oct 14, 2021 | -81.07% Jan 12, 2018 - Jun 29, 2023 |
| #3 | -30.07% Jan 4, 2022 - Aug 2, 2024 | -34.97% Jul 29, 2015 - May 27, 2016 |
| #4 | -24.49% Apr 1, 2004 - Aug 30, 2004 | -18.77% May 31, 2016 - Oct 12, 2016 |
| #5 | -17.10% Mar 20, 2015 - Nov 2, 2015 | -17.95% Oct 17, 2023 - Mar 7, 2024 |
| #6 | -16.25% Aug 2, 2005 - Jan 6, 2006 | -16.84% Mar 24, 2025 - Apr 29, 2026 |
| #7 | -14.95% Mar 3, 2025 - Feb 5, 2026 | -14.79% Sep 2, 2014 - Jun 10, 2015 |
| #8 | -13.68% Dec 31, 2004 - May 16, 2005 | -12.26% Dec 26, 2013 - Mar 4, 2014 |
| #9 | -12.99% Jul 5, 2002 - Jul 29, 2002 | -11.78% Mar 1, 2017 - Jul 28, 2017 |
| #10 | -12.90% Mar 17, 2006 - Sep 12, 2006 | -11.16% Aug 1, 2013 - Nov 8, 2013 |
| #11 | -12.51% Aug 23, 2001 - Nov 23, 2001 | -10.05% Apr 3, 2024 - Jul 17, 2024 |
| #12 | -9.65% Jul 31, 2000 - Dec 11, 2000 | -9.58% Mar 10, 2014 - Aug 26, 2014 |
| #13 | -9.59% May 1, 2000 - Jun 30, 2000 | -8.60% Aug 4, 2017 - Sep 27, 2017 |
| #14 | -9.57% Nov 5, 2021 - Dec 31, 2021 | -8.51% Nov 27, 2024 - Jan 29, 2025 |
| #15 | -8.95% Jan 10, 2000 - Apr 7, 2000 | -8.42% Mar 28, 2013 - May 8, 2013 |
Correlation
Correlation between REG and UNM is 0.83 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
REG vs UNM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | REG | UNM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.88% | 0.99% |
| 2025 | 4.16% | 2.27% |
| 2024 | 3.67% | 2.15% |
| 2023 | 3.91% | 3.07% |
| 2022 | 4.04% | 3.07% |
| 2021 | 3.20% | 4.76% |
| 2020 | 5.22% | 4.97% |
| 2019 | 3.71% | 3.74% |
| 2018 | 3.78% | 3.34% |
| 2017 | 3.04% | 1.57% |
| 2016 | 2.90% | 1.75% |
| 2015 | 2.85% | 2.10% |
| 2014 | 2.95% | 1.78% |
| 2013 | 4.00% | 1.57% |
| 2012 | 3.93% | 2.26% |
| 2011 | 4.92% | 1.87% |
| 2010 | 4.38% | 1.45% |
| 2009 | 6.03% | 1.61% |
| 2008 | 6.21% | 1.61% |
| 2007 | 4.09% | 1.26% |
| 2006 | 3.04% | 1.44% |
| 2005 | 3.73% | 1.32% |
| 2004 | 3.83% | 1.67% |
| 2003 | 5.22% | 2.36% |
| 2002 | 6.30% | 3.36% |
| 2001 | 7.21% | 2.23% |
| 2000 | 8.10% | 2.19% |
| 1999 | 2.30% | 0.46% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks