NAC vs BBMC
Comparison between Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAC, ETF) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceBBMC has outperformed NAC, delivering a return of +7.7% compared to +0.8%
NAC vs BBMC - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
NAC vs BBMC - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
NAC vs BBMC - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | NAC | BBMC |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +3.72% | +12.01% |
| 2025 | +11.67% | +12.44% |
| 2024 | +8.68% | +15.88% |
| 2023 | +3.70% | +19.07% |
| 2022 | -25.50% | -20.05% |
| 2021 | +7.55% | +19.73% |
| 2020 | +6.05% | +61.97% |
| 2019 | +20.38% | N/A |
| 2018 | -6.49% | N/A |
| 2017 | +6.56% | N/A |
| 2016 | -3.29% | N/A |
| 2015 | +9.41% | N/A |
| 2014 | +24.72% | N/A |
| 2013 | -16.01% | N/A |
| 2012 | +20.46% | N/A |
| 2011 | +25.12% | N/A |
| 2010 | +5.90% | N/A |
| 2009 | +30.62% | N/A |
| 2008 | -22.57% | N/A |
| 2007 | -11.93% | N/A |
| 2006 | +3.46% | N/A |
| 2005 | +15.65% | N/A |
| 2004 | +4.51% | N/A |
| 2003 | +11.16% | N/A |
| 2002 | +9.23% | N/A |
| 2001 | +9.47% | N/A |
| 2000 | +22.89% | N/A |
| 1999 | -13.99% | N/A |
NAC vs BBMC Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for NAC was -46.34%, occurring on Dec 12, 2008. Recovery took 607 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for BBMC was -30.12%, occurring on Jun 16, 2022. Recovery took 719 trading sessions.
The current NAC drawdown is -2.46%. The current BBMC drawdown is -0.81%.
| Rank | NAC | BBMC |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -46.34% May 8, 2007 - Oct 2, 2009 | -30.12% Nov 8, 2021 - Sep 19, 2024 |
| #2 | -36.30% Sep 14, 2021 - Oct 25, 2023 | -24.18% Nov 25, 2024 - Aug 28, 2025 |
| #3 | -28.72% Feb 21, 2020 - Dec 7, 2020 | -9.94% Jun 8, 2020 - Aug 5, 2020 |
| #4 | -24.55% Jan 4, 2013 - Oct 30, 2014 | -9.75% Feb 26, 2026 - Apr 16, 2026 |
| #5 | -18.84% Jul 8, 2016 - Jul 18, 2019 | -7.55% Sep 2, 2020 - Oct 5, 2020 |
| #6 | -17.75% Sep 9, 2010 - Sep 1, 2011 | -7.21% Apr 29, 2020 - May 20, 2020 |
| #7 | -15.95% Nov 2, 1999 - Jul 7, 2000 | -7.05% Apr 27, 2021 - Jun 25, 2021 |
| #8 | -15.23% Mar 11, 2004 - Oct 15, 2004 | -6.71% Mar 15, 2021 - Apr 16, 2021 |
| #9 | -10.99% Jun 13, 2003 - Jan 14, 2004 | -6.62% Jun 25, 2021 - Aug 27, 2021 |
| #10 | -10.27% Oct 8, 2009 - May 5, 2010 | -6.45% Oct 27, 2025 - Nov 28, 2025 |
| #11 | -8.73% Nov 15, 2001 - Jul 9, 2002 | -6.27% Feb 12, 2021 - Mar 12, 2021 |
| #12 | -8.50% Sep 7, 2000 - Dec 22, 2000 | -6.13% Oct 12, 2020 - Nov 5, 2020 |
| #13 | -8.45% Feb 29, 2012 - May 3, 2012 | -5.49% Jan 20, 2021 - Feb 5, 2021 |
| #14 | -7.68% Sep 3, 2019 - Jan 30, 2020 | -4.82% Sep 2, 2021 - Oct 19, 2021 |
| #15 | -7.64% Jan 31, 2001 - Jul 18, 2001 | -4.15% Apr 17, 2020 - Apr 27, 2020 |
Correlation
Correlation between NAC and BBMC is 0.47 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
NAC vs BBMC dividend yield comparison.
| Year | NAC | BBMC |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.45% | 0.19% |
| 2025 | 7.47% | 1.25% |
| 2024 | 6.63% | 1.31% |
| 2023 | 4.03% | 1.36% |
| 2022 | 5.47% | 1.48% |
| 2021 | 4.18% | 0.87% |
| 2020 | 4.17% | 0.69% |
| 2019 | 4.38% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 5.34% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 5.54% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 6.25% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 6.05% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 5.61% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 6.92% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 5.72% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 6.38% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 7.16% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 6.40% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 10.52% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 6.01% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 5.77% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 6.22% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 6.92% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 6.26% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 6.47% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 6.21% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 6.07% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 1.19% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks