NAC vs BMOP
Comparison between Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAC, ETF) and BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF (BMOP, ETF).
NAC vs BMOP - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
Net Assets
NAC
$1.80B
BMOP
$1.80B
Expense Ratio
NAC
N/A
BMOP
0.54%
Max Drawdown
NAC
53.70%
Winner
BMOP
3.09%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
NAC
1.66
BMOP
-0.26
5Y Beta
NAC
0.15
Winner
BMOP
0.12
5Y Dividends CAGR
NAC
8.29%
BMOP
N/A
NAC vs BMOP - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
1M
Winner
NAC
+2.69%
BMOP
+0.55%
3M
Winner
NAC
+2.48%
BMOP
+0.38%
6M
NAC
+3.26%
BMOP
N/A
1Y
NAC
+17.32%
BMOP
N/A
5Y(CAGR)
NAC
+0.81%
BMOP
N/A
10Y(CAGR)
NAC
+2.09%
BMOP
N/A
Max(CAGR)
Winner
NAC
+5.70%
BMOP
+2.75%
NAC vs BMOP - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | NAC | BMOP |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +3.72% | +0.87% |
| 2025 | +11.67% | N/A |
| 2024 | +8.68% | N/A |
| 2023 | +3.70% | N/A |
| 2022 | -25.50% | N/A |
| 2021 | +7.55% | N/A |
| 2020 | +6.05% | N/A |
| 2019 | +20.38% | N/A |
| 2018 | -6.49% | N/A |
| 2017 | +6.56% | N/A |
| 2016 | -3.29% | N/A |
| 2015 | +9.41% | N/A |
| 2014 | +24.72% | N/A |
| 2013 | -16.01% | N/A |
| 2012 | +20.46% | N/A |
| 2011 | +25.12% | N/A |
| 2010 | +5.90% | N/A |
| 2009 | +30.62% | N/A |
| 2008 | -22.57% | N/A |
| 2007 | -11.93% | N/A |
| 2006 | +3.46% | N/A |
| 2005 | +15.65% | N/A |
| 2004 | +4.51% | N/A |
| 2003 | +11.16% | N/A |
| 2002 | +9.23% | N/A |
| 2001 | +9.47% | N/A |
| 2000 | +22.89% | N/A |
| 1999 | -13.99% | N/A |
NAC vs BMOP Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for NAC was -46.34%, occurring on Dec 12, 2008. Recovery took 607 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for BMOP was -2.80%, occurring on Mar 24, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current NAC drawdown is -2.46%. The current BMOP drawdown is -0.59%.
| Rank | NAC | BMOP |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -46.34% May 8, 2007 - Oct 2, 2009 | -2.80% Feb 27, 2026 - Mar 24, 2026 |
| #2 | -36.30% Sep 14, 2021 - Oct 25, 2023 | -0.44% Jan 16, 2026 - Feb 3, 2026 |
| #3 | -28.72% Feb 21, 2020 - Dec 7, 2020 | -0.16% Jan 12, 2026 - Jan 15, 2026 |
| #4 | -24.55% Jan 4, 2013 - Oct 30, 2014 | -0.12% Feb 10, 2026 - Feb 13, 2026 |
| #5 | -18.84% Jul 8, 2016 - Jul 18, 2019 | -0.06% Feb 17, 2026 - Feb 20, 2026 |
| #6 | -17.75% Sep 9, 2010 - Sep 1, 2011 | -0.04% Feb 4, 2026 - Feb 10, 2026 |
| #7 | -15.95% Nov 2, 1999 - Jul 7, 2000 | N/A |
| #8 | -15.23% Mar 11, 2004 - Oct 15, 2004 | N/A |
| #9 | -10.99% Jun 13, 2003 - Jan 14, 2004 | N/A |
| #10 | -10.27% Oct 8, 2009 - May 5, 2010 | N/A |
| #11 | -8.73% Nov 15, 2001 - Jul 9, 2002 | N/A |
| #12 | -8.50% Sep 7, 2000 - Dec 22, 2000 | N/A |
| #13 | -8.45% Feb 29, 2012 - May 3, 2012 | N/A |
| #14 | -7.68% Sep 3, 2019 - Jan 30, 2020 | N/A |
| #15 | -7.64% Jan 31, 2001 - Jul 18, 2001 | N/A |
Correlation
Correlation between NAC and BMOP is 0.89 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
0.89
-101
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
NAC vs BMOP dividend yield comparison.
| Year | NAC | BMOP |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.45% | 0.95% |
| 2025 | 7.47% | 0.00% |
| 2024 | 6.63% | 0.00% |
| 2023 | 4.03% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 5.47% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 4.18% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 4.17% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 4.38% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 5.34% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 5.54% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 6.25% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 6.05% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 5.61% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 6.92% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 5.72% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 6.38% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 7.16% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 6.40% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 10.52% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 6.01% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 5.77% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 6.22% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 6.92% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 6.26% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 6.47% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 6.21% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 6.07% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 1.19% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
Popular: NAC vs SPYBMOP vs SPY
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks