NAC vs PXH
Comparison between Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAC, ETF) and INVESCO RAFI EMERGING MARKETS ETF (PXH, ETF).
5-Year PerformancePXH has outperformed NAC, delivering a return of +9.6% compared to +0.8%
NAC vs PXH - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
NAC vs PXH - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
NAC vs PXH - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | NAC | PXH |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +3.72% | +11.65% |
| 2025 | +11.67% | +32.33% |
| 2024 | +8.68% | +13.60% |
| 2023 | +3.70% | +13.38% |
| 2022 | -25.50% | -15.91% |
| 2021 | +7.55% | +8.12% |
| 2020 | +6.05% | -4.00% |
| 2019 | +20.38% | +15.53% |
| 2018 | -6.49% | -10.54% |
| 2017 | +6.56% | +24.12% |
| 2016 | -3.29% | +36.69% |
| 2015 | +9.41% | -21.91% |
| 2014 | +24.72% | -3.34% |
| 2013 | -16.01% | -9.11% |
| 2012 | +20.46% | +12.13% |
| 2011 | +25.12% | -20.56% |
| 2010 | +5.90% | +10.08% |
| 2009 | +30.62% | +60.24% |
| 2008 | -22.57% | -44.13% |
| 2007 | -11.93% | +1.04% |
| 2006 | +3.46% | N/A |
| 2005 | +15.65% | N/A |
| 2004 | +4.51% | N/A |
| 2003 | +11.16% | N/A |
| 2002 | +9.23% | N/A |
| 2001 | +9.47% | N/A |
| 2000 | +22.89% | N/A |
| 1999 | -13.99% | N/A |
NAC vs PXH Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for NAC was -46.34%, occurring on Dec 12, 2008. Recovery took 607 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for PXH was -63.64%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 866 trading sessions.
The current NAC drawdown is -2.46%. The current PXH drawdown is -0.41%.
| Rank | NAC | PXH |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -46.34% May 8, 2007 - Oct 2, 2009 | -63.64% Oct 29, 2007 - Apr 6, 2011 |
| #2 | -36.30% Sep 14, 2021 - Oct 25, 2023 | -49.58% Apr 7, 2011 - Jan 2, 2018 |
| #3 | -28.72% Feb 21, 2020 - Dec 7, 2020 | -40.40% Jan 26, 2018 - Feb 11, 2021 |
| #4 | -24.55% Jan 4, 2013 - Oct 30, 2014 | -29.62% Feb 16, 2022 - May 16, 2024 |
| #5 | -18.84% Jul 8, 2016 - Jul 18, 2019 | -17.73% Oct 7, 2024 - Jun 9, 2025 |
| #6 | -17.75% Sep 9, 2010 - Sep 1, 2011 | -10.24% Feb 25, 2026 - May 5, 2026 |
| #7 | -15.95% Nov 2, 1999 - Jul 7, 2000 | -9.29% Jun 10, 2021 - Feb 9, 2022 |
| #8 | -15.23% Mar 11, 2004 - Oct 15, 2004 | -8.97% May 17, 2024 - Sep 24, 2024 |
| #9 | -10.99% Jun 13, 2003 - Jan 14, 2004 | -6.09% Oct 12, 2007 - Oct 26, 2007 |
| #10 | -10.27% Oct 8, 2009 - May 5, 2010 | -5.49% Feb 17, 2021 - May 7, 2021 |
| #11 | -8.73% Nov 15, 2001 - Jul 9, 2002 | -4.78% Oct 6, 2025 - Oct 20, 2025 |
| #12 | -8.50% Sep 7, 2000 - Dec 22, 2000 | -4.18% May 7, 2021 - May 27, 2021 |
| #13 | -8.45% Feb 29, 2012 - May 3, 2012 | -4.06% Nov 12, 2025 - Jan 2, 2026 |
| #14 | -7.68% Sep 3, 2019 - Jan 30, 2020 | -3.69% Jul 23, 2025 - Aug 12, 2025 |
| #15 | -7.64% Jan 31, 2001 - Jul 18, 2001 | -3.46% Jan 29, 2026 - Feb 11, 2026 |
Correlation
Correlation between NAC and PXH is 0.62 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
NAC vs PXH dividend yield comparison.
| Year | NAC | PXH |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.45% | 0.32% |
| 2025 | 7.47% | 4.02% |
| 2024 | 6.63% | 4.43% |
| 2023 | 4.03% | 4.84% |
| 2022 | 5.47% | 5.33% |
| 2021 | 4.18% | 4.69% |
| 2020 | 4.17% | 2.79% |
| 2019 | 4.38% | 3.28% |
| 2018 | 5.34% | 3.30% |
| 2017 | 5.54% | 2.74% |
| 2016 | 6.25% | 1.97% |
| 2015 | 6.05% | 3.44% |
| 2014 | 5.61% | 3.19% |
| 2013 | 6.92% | 2.80% |
| 2012 | 5.72% | 2.08% |
| 2011 | 6.38% | 2.46% |
| 2010 | 7.16% | 1.05% |
| 2009 | 6.40% | 0.83% |
| 2008 | 10.52% | 2.79% |
| 2007 | 6.01% | 0.44% |
| 2006 | 5.77% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 6.22% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 6.92% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 6.26% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 6.47% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 6.21% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 6.07% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 1.19% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks