LNG vs CQP
Comparison between Cheniere Energy Inc (LNG, Company) and Cheniere Energy Partners LP (CQP, Company).
Both LNG and CQP are from the Energy sector.
5-Year PerformanceLNG has outperformed CQP, delivering a return of +27.7% compared to +17.0%
LNG vs CQP - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
LNG vs CQP - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
LNG vs CQP - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | LNG | CQP |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +38.18% | +25.22% |
| 2025 | -11.06% | +1.85% |
| 2024 | +28.14% | +9.37% |
| 2023 | +22.73% | -1.11% |
| 2022 | +47.77% | +44.85% |
| 2021 | +72.70% | +29.47% |
| 2020 | -3.67% | -4.20% |
| 2019 | +1.45% | +17.88% |
| 2018 | +8.21% | +29.23% |
| 2017 | +27.13% | +7.48% |
| 2016 | +10.45% | +19.44% |
| 2015 | -47.77% | -15.36% |
| 2014 | +62.10% | +19.27% |
| 2013 | +121.13% | +41.07% |
| 2012 | +114.63% | +26.60% |
| 2011 | +35.36% | -8.85% |
| 2010 | +121.69% | +74.14% |
| 2009 | -19.60% | +242.49% |
| 2008 | -91.17% | -73.00% |
| 2007 | +16.61% | -22.58% |
| 2006 | -23.44% | N/A |
| 2005 | +20.14% | N/A |
| 2004 | +473.36% | N/A |
| 2003 | +800.00% | N/A |
| 2002 | +34.74% | N/A |
| 2001 | -57.98% | N/A |
| 2000 | -12.68% | N/A |
| 1999 | -20.88% | N/A |
LNG vs CQP Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for LNG was -97.84%, occurring on Oct 15, 2008. Recovery took 1913 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CQP was -78.51%, occurring on Dec 31, 2008. Recovery took 686 trading sessions.
The current LNG drawdown is -8.18%. The current CQP drawdown is -4.98%.
| Rank | LNG | CQP |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -97.84% May 2, 2006 - Dec 5, 2013 | -78.51% Apr 17, 2007 - Jan 5, 2010 |
| #2 | -86.11% Feb 18, 2000 - Aug 18, 2003 | -60.29% Sep 16, 2019 - Mar 11, 2021 |
| #3 | -72.00% Sep 18, 2014 - May 24, 2021 | -46.98% Jan 13, 2011 - Feb 27, 2012 |
| #4 | -53.19% Nov 2, 1999 - Jan 26, 2000 | -37.91% Jun 23, 2015 - Jan 26, 2017 |
| #5 | -41.98% Jan 26, 2004 - Jun 23, 2004 | -31.58% Apr 27, 2012 - Mar 22, 2013 |
| #6 | -34.10% Feb 3, 2005 - Sep 1, 2005 | -29.08% Nov 30, 2022 - Nov 2, 2023 |
| #7 | -28.06% Oct 14, 2003 - Dec 22, 2003 | -27.92% May 4, 2022 - Aug 25, 2022 |
| #8 | -25.37% Jan 28, 2000 - Feb 8, 2000 | -24.86% Nov 30, 2023 - Dec 2, 2024 |
| #9 | -24.87% Jan 16, 2025 - Mar 6, 2026 | -24.25% Apr 23, 2010 - Jul 20, 2010 |
| #10 | -24.09% Mar 27, 2026 - May 29, 2026 | -23.60% Apr 1, 2025 - Mar 5, 2026 |
| #11 | -22.83% Nov 1, 2022 - Nov 22, 2023 | -19.63% May 30, 2014 - Apr 30, 2015 |
| #12 | -22.02% Jun 25, 2004 - Oct 4, 2004 | -19.24% Mar 4, 2022 - May 4, 2022 |
| #13 | -19.86% Feb 8, 2000 - Feb 18, 2000 | -19.17% May 31, 2013 - Jul 23, 2013 |
| #14 | -18.70% Oct 3, 2005 - Apr 19, 2006 | -17.85% May 25, 2017 - May 4, 2018 |
| #15 | -17.82% Mar 25, 2022 - Jul 29, 2022 | -17.62% Mar 24, 2026 - Jun 24, 2026 |
Correlation
Correlation between LNG and CQP is 0.96 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (2007 - 2026)
LNG vs CQP dividend yield comparison.
| Year | LNG | CQP |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.41% | 2.46% |
| 2025 | 1.06% | 6.15% |
| 2024 | 0.84% | 5.06% |
| 2023 | 0.95% | 8.36% |
| 2022 | 0.92% | 6.82% |
| 2021 | 0.33% | 6.30% |
| 2020 | 0.00% | 7.28% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 6.08% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 6.07% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 5.79% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 5.90% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 6.52% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 5.31% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 5.93% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 8.00% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 9.43% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 7.98% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 13.17% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 45.82% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 5.47% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks