CQP vs BAP
Comparison between Cheniere Energy Partners LP (CQP, Company) and Credicorp Ltd (BAP, Company).
CQP is from the Energy sector, while BAP is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceBAP has outperformed CQP, delivering a return of +33.5% compared to +17.0%
CQP vs BAP - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CQP vs BAP - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CQP vs BAP - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CQP | BAP |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +25.22% | +41.73% |
| 2025 | +1.85% | +64.72% |
| 2024 | +9.37% | +32.49% |
| 2023 | -1.11% | +14.25% |
| 2022 | +44.85% | +12.39% |
| 2021 | +29.47% | -21.66% |
| 2020 | -4.20% | -20.35% |
| 2019 | +17.88% | -2.35% |
| 2018 | +29.23% | +5.74% |
| 2017 | +7.48% | +34.80% |
| 2016 | +19.44% | +69.45% |
| 2015 | -15.36% | -38.03% |
| 2014 | +19.27% | +24.00% |
| 2013 | +41.07% | -9.54% |
| 2012 | +26.60% | +36.81% |
| 2011 | -8.85% | -6.73% |
| 2010 | +74.14% | +56.14% |
| 2009 | +242.49% | +56.69% |
| 2008 | -73.00% | -32.22% |
| 2007 | -22.58% | +87.36% |
| 2006 | N/A | +75.55% |
| 2005 | N/A | +51.20% |
| 2004 | N/A | +21.81% |
| 2003 | N/A | +44.34% |
| 2002 | N/A | +10.25% |
| 2001 | N/A | +51.09% |
| 2000 | N/A | -48.50% |
| 1999 | N/A | +12.89% |
CQP vs BAP Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CQP was -78.51%, occurring on Dec 31, 2008. Recovery took 686 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for BAP was -64.93%, occurring on Oct 27, 2008. Recovery took 440 trading sessions.
The current CQP drawdown is -4.98%. The current BAP drawdown is -3.27%.
| Rank | CQP | BAP |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -78.51% Apr 17, 2007 - Jan 5, 2010 | -64.93% Jun 16, 2008 - Mar 16, 2010 |
| #2 | -60.29% Sep 16, 2019 - Mar 11, 2021 | -59.33% Mar 18, 2019 - Nov 18, 2024 |
| #3 | -46.98% Jan 13, 2011 - Feb 27, 2012 | -56.49% Jan 14, 2000 - Nov 25, 2003 |
| #4 | -37.91% Jun 23, 2015 - Jan 26, 2017 | -48.00% Dec 3, 2014 - Jan 10, 2017 |
| #5 | -31.58% Apr 27, 2012 - Mar 22, 2013 | -34.18% Nov 8, 2010 - Mar 1, 2012 |
| #6 | -29.08% Nov 30, 2022 - Nov 2, 2023 | -30.50% Mar 28, 2013 - Nov 4, 2014 |
| #7 | -27.92% May 4, 2022 - Aug 25, 2022 | -24.06% Oct 4, 2005 - Feb 27, 2006 |
| #8 | -24.86% Nov 30, 2023 - Dec 2, 2024 | -20.00% Jan 7, 2004 - Oct 6, 2004 |
| #9 | -24.25% Apr 23, 2010 - Jul 20, 2010 | -16.75% Feb 20, 2007 - Apr 17, 2007 |
| #10 | -23.60% Apr 1, 2025 - Mar 5, 2026 | -16.29% Apr 5, 2012 - Nov 9, 2012 |
| #11 | -19.63% May 30, 2014 - Apr 30, 2015 | -15.71% Feb 3, 2026 - Jun 11, 2026 |
| #12 | -19.24% Mar 4, 2022 - May 4, 2022 | -15.41% Nov 8, 2006 - Feb 9, 2007 |
| #13 | -19.17% May 31, 2013 - Jul 23, 2013 | -15.08% Jul 23, 2007 - Sep 27, 2007 |
| #14 | -17.85% May 25, 2017 - May 4, 2018 | -14.90% Feb 27, 2006 - May 9, 2006 |
| #15 | -17.62% Mar 24, 2026 - Jun 24, 2026 | -14.48% Nov 21, 2024 - Apr 28, 2025 |
Correlation
Correlation between CQP and BAP is 0.80 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
CQP vs BAP dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CQP | BAP |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.46% | 3.68% |
| 2025 | 6.15% | 3.78% |
| 2024 | 5.06% | 6.65% |
| 2023 | 8.36% | 4.52% |
| 2022 | 6.82% | 2.84% |
| 2021 | 6.30% | 0.99% |
| 2020 | 7.28% | 5.37% |
| 2019 | 6.08% | 3.95% |
| 2018 | 6.07% | 1.94% |
| 2017 | 5.79% | 4.16% |
| 2016 | 5.90% | 1.47% |
| 2015 | 6.52% | 2.25% |
| 2014 | 5.31% | 1.19% |
| 2013 | 5.93% | 1.96% |
| 2012 | 8.00% | 1.57% |
| 2011 | 9.43% | 1.78% |
| 2010 | 7.98% | 1.43% |
| 2009 | 13.17% | 1.95% |
| 2008 | 45.82% | 3.00% |
| 2007 | 5.47% | 1.70% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 2.69% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 3.51% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 2.53% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 2.25% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 2.13% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 3.43% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 1.67% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks