BAP vs CHT
Comparison between Credicorp Ltd (BAP, Company) and Chunghwa Telecom (CHT, Company).
BAP is from the Financial Services sector, while CHT is from the Communication Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceBAP has outperformed CHT, delivering a return of +33.5% compared to +5.2%
BAP vs CHT - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
BAP vs CHT - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
BAP vs CHT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | BAP | CHT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +41.73% | +5.53% |
| 2025 | +64.72% | +15.49% |
| 2024 | +32.49% | +0.63% |
| 2023 | +14.25% | +9.01% |
| 2022 | +12.39% | -9.52% |
| 2021 | -21.66% | +12.87% |
| 2020 | -20.35% | +8.87% |
| 2019 | -2.35% | +9.33% |
| 2018 | +5.74% | +3.67% |
| 2017 | +34.80% | +15.98% |
| 2016 | +69.45% | +10.57% |
| 2015 | -38.03% | +6.34% |
| 2014 | +24.00% | -0.47% |
| 2013 | -9.54% | +0.10% |
| 2012 | +36.81% | +7.65% |
| 2011 | -6.73% | +38.86% |
| 2010 | +56.14% | +43.01% |
| 2009 | +56.69% | +34.35% |
| 2008 | -32.22% | -14.41% |
| 2007 | +87.36% | +2.08% |
| 2006 | +75.55% | +11.40% |
| 2005 | +51.20% | -6.57% |
| 2004 | +21.81% | +59.36% |
| 2003 | +44.34% | -2.62% |
| 2002 | +10.25% | N/A |
| 2001 | +51.09% | N/A |
| 2000 | -48.50% | N/A |
| 1999 | +12.89% | N/A |
BAP vs CHT Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for BAP was -64.93%, occurring on Oct 27, 2008. Recovery took 440 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CHT was -44.43%, occurring on Oct 24, 2008. Recovery took 595 trading sessions.
The current BAP drawdown is -3.27%. The current CHT drawdown is -4.81%.
| Rank | BAP | CHT |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -64.93% Jun 16, 2008 - Mar 16, 2010 | -44.43% Mar 24, 2008 - Aug 2, 2010 |
| #2 | -59.33% Mar 18, 2019 - Nov 18, 2024 | -25.11% May 8, 2006 - Feb 20, 2008 |
| #3 | -56.49% Jan 14, 2000 - Nov 25, 2003 | -23.72% Feb 23, 2022 - Sep 26, 2024 |
| #4 | -48.00% Dec 3, 2014 - Jan 10, 2017 | -19.37% Aug 3, 2005 - May 2, 2006 |
| #5 | -34.18% Nov 8, 2010 - Mar 1, 2012 | -18.37% Jul 20, 2011 - Jul 11, 2013 |
| #6 | -30.50% Mar 28, 2013 - Nov 4, 2014 | -16.10% Aug 11, 2016 - Jan 2, 2018 |
| #7 | -24.06% Oct 4, 2005 - Feb 27, 2006 | -12.38% Apr 19, 2004 - Jul 9, 2004 |
| #8 | -20.00% Jan 7, 2004 - Oct 6, 2004 | -12.26% Oct 30, 2003 - Jan 28, 2004 |
| #9 | -16.75% Feb 20, 2007 - Apr 17, 2007 | -11.57% Feb 25, 2005 - Aug 3, 2005 |
| #10 | -16.29% Apr 5, 2012 - Nov 9, 2012 | -11.03% Aug 19, 2025 - Jun 11, 2026 |
| #11 | -15.71% Feb 3, 2026 - Jun 11, 2026 | -10.59% Jul 22, 2013 - Aug 22, 2014 |
| #12 | -15.41% Nov 8, 2006 - Feb 9, 2007 | -9.47% Apr 10, 2018 - Oct 4, 2019 |
| #13 | -15.08% Jul 23, 2007 - Sep 27, 2007 | -9.39% Sep 26, 2024 - May 2, 2025 |
| #14 | -14.90% Feb 27, 2006 - May 9, 2006 | -8.68% Mar 18, 2004 - Apr 5, 2004 |
| #15 | -14.48% Nov 21, 2024 - Apr 28, 2025 | -7.76% Aug 28, 2014 - Feb 27, 2015 |
Correlation
Correlation between BAP and CHT is 0.85 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
BAP vs CHT dividend yield comparison.
| Year | BAP | CHT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.68% | 3.90% |
| 2025 | 3.78% | 4.00% |
| 2024 | 6.65% | 3.91% |
| 2023 | 4.52% | 3.91% |
| 2022 | 2.84% | 4.35% |
| 2021 | 0.99% | 3.67% |
| 2020 | 5.37% | 3.67% |
| 2019 | 3.95% | 3.91% |
| 2018 | 1.94% | 4.44% |
| 2017 | 4.16% | 3.64% |
| 2016 | 1.47% | 4.32% |
| 2015 | 2.25% | 3.88% |
| 2014 | 1.19% | 4.51% |
| 2013 | 1.96% | 4.68% |
| 2012 | 1.57% | 8.89% |
| 2011 | 1.78% | 5.74% |
| 2010 | 1.43% | 4.97% |
| 2009 | 1.95% | 4.89% |
| 2008 | 3.00% | 6.49% |
| 2007 | 1.70% | 5.78% |
| 2006 | 2.69% | 5.32% |
| 2005 | 3.51% | 6.34% |
| 2004 | 2.53% | 10.10% |
| 2003 | 2.25% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 2.13% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 3.43% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 1.67% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks