BAP vs CQP
Comparison between Credicorp Ltd (BAP, Company) and Cheniere Energy Partners LP (CQP, Company).
BAP is from the Financial Services sector, while CQP is from the Energy sector.
5-Year PerformanceBAP has outperformed CQP, delivering a return of +33.5% compared to +17.0%
BAP vs CQP - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
BAP vs CQP - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
BAP vs CQP - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | BAP | CQP |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +42.08% | +25.00% |
| 2025 | +64.72% | +1.85% |
| 2024 | +32.49% | +9.37% |
| 2023 | +14.25% | -1.11% |
| 2022 | +12.39% | +44.85% |
| 2021 | -21.66% | +29.47% |
| 2020 | -20.35% | -4.20% |
| 2019 | -2.35% | +17.88% |
| 2018 | +5.74% | +29.23% |
| 2017 | +34.80% | +7.48% |
| 2016 | +69.45% | +19.44% |
| 2015 | -38.03% | -15.36% |
| 2014 | +24.00% | +19.27% |
| 2013 | -9.54% | +41.07% |
| 2012 | +36.81% | +26.60% |
| 2011 | -6.73% | -8.85% |
| 2010 | +56.14% | +74.14% |
| 2009 | +56.69% | +242.49% |
| 2008 | -32.22% | -73.00% |
| 2007 | +87.36% | -22.58% |
| 2006 | +75.55% | N/A |
| 2005 | +51.20% | N/A |
| 2004 | +21.81% | N/A |
| 2003 | +44.34% | N/A |
| 2002 | +10.25% | N/A |
| 2001 | +51.09% | N/A |
| 2000 | -48.50% | N/A |
| 1999 | +12.89% | N/A |
BAP vs CQP Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for BAP was -64.93%, occurring on Oct 27, 2008. Recovery took 440 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CQP was -78.51%, occurring on Dec 31, 2008. Recovery took 686 trading sessions.
The current BAP drawdown is -3.03%. The current CQP drawdown is -5.15%.
| Rank | BAP | CQP |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -64.93% Jun 16, 2008 - Mar 16, 2010 | -78.51% Apr 17, 2007 - Jan 5, 2010 |
| #2 | -59.33% Mar 18, 2019 - Nov 18, 2024 | -60.29% Sep 16, 2019 - Mar 11, 2021 |
| #3 | -56.49% Jan 14, 2000 - Nov 25, 2003 | -46.98% Jan 13, 2011 - Feb 27, 2012 |
| #4 | -48.00% Dec 3, 2014 - Jan 10, 2017 | -37.91% Jun 23, 2015 - Jan 26, 2017 |
| #5 | -34.18% Nov 8, 2010 - Mar 1, 2012 | -31.58% Apr 27, 2012 - Mar 22, 2013 |
| #6 | -30.50% Mar 28, 2013 - Nov 4, 2014 | -29.08% Nov 30, 2022 - Nov 2, 2023 |
| #7 | -24.06% Oct 4, 2005 - Feb 27, 2006 | -27.92% May 4, 2022 - Aug 25, 2022 |
| #8 | -20.00% Jan 7, 2004 - Oct 6, 2004 | -24.86% Nov 30, 2023 - Dec 2, 2024 |
| #9 | -16.75% Feb 20, 2007 - Apr 17, 2007 | -24.25% Apr 23, 2010 - Jul 20, 2010 |
| #10 | -16.29% Apr 5, 2012 - Nov 9, 2012 | -23.60% Apr 1, 2025 - Mar 5, 2026 |
| #11 | -15.71% Feb 3, 2026 - Jun 11, 2026 | -19.63% May 30, 2014 - Apr 30, 2015 |
| #12 | -15.41% Nov 8, 2006 - Feb 9, 2007 | -19.24% Mar 4, 2022 - May 4, 2022 |
| #13 | -15.08% Jul 23, 2007 - Sep 27, 2007 | -19.17% May 31, 2013 - Jul 23, 2013 |
| #14 | -14.90% Feb 27, 2006 - May 9, 2006 | -17.85% May 25, 2017 - May 4, 2018 |
| #15 | -14.48% Nov 21, 2024 - Apr 28, 2025 | -17.62% Mar 24, 2026 - Jun 24, 2026 |
Correlation
Correlation between BAP and CQP is 0.80 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
BAP vs CQP dividend yield comparison.
| Year | BAP | CQP |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.67% | 2.47% |
| 2025 | 3.78% | 6.15% |
| 2024 | 6.65% | 5.06% |
| 2023 | 4.52% | 8.36% |
| 2022 | 2.84% | 6.82% |
| 2021 | 0.99% | 6.30% |
| 2020 | 5.37% | 7.28% |
| 2019 | 3.95% | 6.08% |
| 2018 | 1.94% | 6.07% |
| 2017 | 4.16% | 5.79% |
| 2016 | 1.47% | 5.90% |
| 2015 | 2.25% | 6.52% |
| 2014 | 1.19% | 5.31% |
| 2013 | 1.96% | 5.93% |
| 2012 | 1.57% | 8.00% |
| 2011 | 1.78% | 9.43% |
| 2010 | 1.43% | 7.98% |
| 2009 | 1.95% | 13.17% |
| 2008 | 3.00% | 45.82% |
| 2007 | 1.70% | 5.47% |
| 2006 | 2.69% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 3.51% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 2.53% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 2.25% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 2.13% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 3.43% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 1.67% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks