StockComparison Logo
vs

CIVB vs RGR

Comparison between Civista Bancshares Inc (CIVB, Company) and Sturm Ruger & Co. Inc (RGR, Company).

CIVB is from the Financial Services sector, while RGR is from the Industrials sector.

5-Year PerformanceCIVB has outperformed RGR, delivering a return of +8.1% compared to -9.2%

CIVB vs RGR - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
CIVB
$606M
RGR
$603M
Max Drawdown
CIVB
90.89%
Winner
RGR
79.69%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
CIVB
1.65
RGR
0.31
5Y Beta
CIVB
0.63
Winner
RGR
0.43
Industry
CIVB
Banks - Regional
RGR
Aerospace & Defense
P/E Ratio
CIVB
10.52
Winner
RGR
-74.40
Forward P/E
CIVB
9.53
Winner
RGR
8.61
PEG Ratio
CIVB
0.33
Winner
RGR
0.00
Dividend Yield
Winner
CIVB
2.39%
RGR
0.78%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
CIVB
8.76%
RGR
-40.89%
5Y EPS CAGR
CIVB
18.98%
RGR
N/A
Debt to Equity
CIVB
0.00%
RGR
0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
CIVB
8.34%
RGR
7.85%
P/S Ratio
CIVB
3.31
Winner
RGR
1.09
P/B Ratio
Winner
CIVB
1.07
RGR
2.16

CIVB vs RGR - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
CIVB
+0.21%
RGR
-1.20%
3M
Winner
CIVB
+16.75%
RGR
-13.64%
6M
Winner
CIVB
+22.21%
RGR
+1.80%
1Y
Winner
CIVB
+54.00%
RGR
+9.99%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
CIVB
+8.13%
RGR
-9.20%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
CIVB
+10.24%
RGR
-2.32%
Max(CAGR)
CIVB
+4.60%
Winner
RGR
+9.79%

CIVB vs RGR - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCIVBRGR
2026+34.77%+11.59%
2025+12.54%-4.76%
2024+19.02%-20.21%
2023-11.16%-10.53%
2022-8.50%-16.59%
2021+41.05%+6.13%
2020-25.07%+49.71%
2019+43.00%-11.43%
2018-19.48%-4.81%
2017+15.14%+7.12%
2016+66.47%-11.80%
2015+28.12%+74.22%
2014+59.93%-51.68%
2013+23.96%+65.20%
2012+32.89%+48.44%
2011+1.56%+125.49%
2010-14.41%+52.64%
2009-23.15%+58.94%
2008-53.83%-28.76%
2007-24.22%-13.75%
2006+6.60%+36.75%
2005-14.43%-17.66%
2004-16.04%-18.33%
2003+22.69%+24.84%
2002+13.73%-13.76%
2001+14.08%+37.95%
2000N/A+15.29%
1999N/A+0.86%

CIVB vs RGR Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CIVB was -87.15%, occurring on Oct 7, 2011. Recovery took 3458 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for RGR was -79.69%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 912 trading sessions.

The current CIVB drawdown is -0.82%. The current RGR drawdown is -48.99%.

RankCIVBRGR
#1-87.15%
Apr 28, 2003 - Feb 3, 2017
-79.69%
Aug 7, 2007 - Mar 21, 2011
#2-53.27%
Jun 6, 2018 - Jun 7, 2021
-60.65%
Jun 30, 2021 - Nov 20, 2025
#3-42.06%
Nov 23, 2021 - May 2, 2025
-58.67%
Jan 16, 2014 - Jun 30, 2020
#4-24.00%
Oct 12, 2001 - Aug 22, 2002
-57.09%
Apr 7, 2004 - Mar 20, 2007
#5-22.85%
Jul 3, 2025 - Feb 4, 2026
-39.73%
May 28, 2002 - Feb 10, 2004
#6-21.11%
Jan 31, 2001 - Jul 9, 2001
-38.89%
May 2, 2012 - Nov 27, 2012
#7-16.43%
Feb 14, 2017 - Oct 10, 2017
-30.68%
Aug 30, 2011 - Jan 5, 2012
#8-11.49%
Feb 5, 2026 - Apr 24, 2026
-28.36%
May 24, 2000 - Jan 4, 2001
#9-11.33%
Nov 29, 2017 - Mar 6, 2018
-28.07%
Aug 10, 2020 - Jun 21, 2021
#10-11.27%
Oct 10, 2017 - Nov 29, 2017
-26.29%
Nov 29, 2012 - Feb 8, 2013
#11-9.89%
Jun 7, 2021 - Aug 11, 2021
-20.72%
Apr 29, 2011 - Jul 22, 2011
#12-8.45%
Aug 27, 2001 - Oct 9, 2001
-19.15%
Mar 4, 2013 - Sep 10, 2013
#13-8.42%
May 15, 2025 - Jul 2, 2025
-15.98%
Jan 19, 2000 - May 24, 2000
#14-7.97%
Mar 7, 2018 - May 22, 2018
-15.73%
Oct 15, 2001 - Mar 4, 2002
#15-7.21%
Aug 11, 2021 - Oct 5, 2021
-15.51%
Jan 16, 2001 - Sep 24, 2001

Correlation

Correlation between CIVB and RGR is 0.50 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.

0.50
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

CIVB vs RGR dividend yield comparison.

YearCIVBRGR
20261.24%0.51%
20253.06%1.90%
20243.04%1.95%
20233.31%2.79%
20222.54%14.66%
20212.13%4.94%
20202.51%10.00%
20191.75%1.74%
20181.84%2.07%
20171.14%2.44%
20161.13%3.28%
20151.56%1.85%
20141.85%4.68%
20132.30%2.91%
20122.29%12.76%
20110.74%1.29%
20100.00%2.16%
20095.38%3.14%
200815.19%0.00%
20077.97%0.00%
20065.69%0.00%
20055.74%4.28%
20044.63%6.64%
20033.67%7.04%
20025.48%8.36%
20014.66%6.68%
20000.00%8.47%
19990.00%2.25%

Select Stocks to Compare