StockComparison Logo
vs

CIG vs FNB

Comparison between Cia Energetica DE Minas Gerais - Cemig (CIG, Company) and F.N.B. Corp (FNB, Company).

CIG is from the Utilities sector, while FNB is from the Financial Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceCIG has outperformed FNB, delivering a return of +24.2% compared to +9.0%

CIG vs FNB - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
CIG
$6.28B
Winner
FNB
$6.31B
Max Drawdown
CIG
92.66%
Winner
FNB
84.82%
Sharpe Ratio
CIG
0.86
Winner
FNB
1.01
5Y Beta
Winner
CIG
0.48
FNB
1.14
Industry
CIG
Utilities - Regulated Electric
FNB
Banks - Regional
P/E Ratio
Winner
CIG
8.31
FNB
11.86
Forward P/E
CIG
10.18
Winner
FNB
9.73
PEG Ratio
Winner
CIG
0.33
FNB
1.71
Dividend Yield
Winner
CIG
56.10%
FNB
2.72%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
CIG
17.96%
FNB
4.56%
5Y EPS CAGR
CIG
1.15%
Winner
FNB
5.08%
Debt to Equity
CIG
69.27%
Winner
FNB
61.14%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
CIG
9.54%
FNB
7.39%
P/S Ratio
Winner
CIG
0.14
FNB
3.65
P/B Ratio
CIG
1.10
Winner
FNB
0.92

CIG vs FNB - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
CIG
-10.79%
Winner
FNB
-0.34%
3M
CIG
-2.37%
Winner
FNB
+1.39%
6M
Winner
CIG
+8.61%
FNB
+6.48%
1Y
CIG
+25.31%
Winner
FNB
+28.42%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
CIG
+24.19%
FNB
+9.04%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
CIG
+21.59%
FNB
+6.95%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
CIG
+11.18%
FNB
+5.33%

CIG vs FNB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCIGFNB
2026+8.05%+2.34%
2025+26.56%+21.36%
2024+11.28%+9.91%
2023+27.54%+9.95%
2022+67.69%+8.51%
2021-2.27%+33.50%
2020-8.86%-21.15%
2019-5.09%+33.48%
2018+77.82%-26.02%
2017-11.65%-7.61%
2016+70.46%+28.34%
2015-68.89%+5.39%
2014+16.59%+11.39%
2013-18.49%+15.83%
2012-14.41%-5.16%
2011+11.82%+16.21%
2010+6.55%+48.15%
2009+62.12%-45.49%
2008-23.78%-0.14%
2007+14.88%-15.16%
2006+25.46%+10.41%
2005+71.50%-10.13%
2004+39.19%+9.56%
2003+152.45%+29.97%
2002-47.63%+7.44%
2001+1.70%+24.31%
2000-29.82%-2.66%
1999+63.45%-13.41%

CIG vs FNB Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CIG was -87.95%, occurring on Jan 20, 2016. Recovery took 3027 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for FNB was -69.67%, occurring on Feb 23, 2009. Recovery took 2381 trading sessions.

The current CIG drawdown is -19.94%. The current FNB drawdown is -7.02%.

RankCIGFNB
#1-87.95%
Aug 10, 2012 - Aug 23, 2024
-69.67%
Oct 4, 2004 - Mar 20, 2014
#2-76.36%
Dec 31, 1999 - Jan 5, 2004
-60.12%
Mar 1, 2017 - Mar 12, 2021
#3-52.40%
Jul 21, 2008 - Oct 18, 2010
-33.79%
Nov 15, 1999 - Jun 12, 2001
#4-42.21%
Jan 12, 2004 - Aug 19, 2004
-32.58%
Nov 25, 2024 - Sep 4, 2025
#5-33.05%
Mar 1, 2006 - Apr 13, 2007
-28.54%
Feb 7, 2023 - Mar 27, 2024
#6-30.35%
Jul 1, 2011 - Jan 31, 2012
-23.27%
Dec 1, 2015 - Nov 11, 2016
#7-29.90%
Jul 12, 2007 - May 16, 2008
-22.92%
Jan 14, 2022 - Oct 19, 2022
#8-21.14%
Dec 15, 2004 - Feb 14, 2005
-20.24%
Jun 1, 2021 - Jan 6, 2022
#9-20.22%
Sep 5, 2024 - Jun 30, 2025
-19.78%
Apr 12, 2002 - Jul 30, 2003
#10-19.94%
Apr 10, 2026 - May 29, 2026
-17.83%
Jul 16, 2015 - Nov 24, 2015
#11-18.50%
Feb 17, 2005 - Apr 11, 2005
-17.16%
Aug 20, 2001 - Feb 5, 2002
#12-14.85%
Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 29, 2005
-16.24%
Mar 8, 2004 - Sep 9, 2004
#13-14.04%
Nov 11, 2025 - Jan 27, 2026
-15.75%
Feb 9, 2026 - Mar 18, 2026
#14-14.00%
Aug 10, 2005 - Sep 9, 2005
-13.25%
Jul 26, 2024 - Nov 6, 2024
#15-13.41%
Apr 25, 2012 - Aug 6, 2012
-12.75%
Sep 4, 2025 - Dec 1, 2025

Correlation

Correlation between CIG and FNB is 0.63 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.63
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

CIG vs FNB dividend yield comparison.

YearCIGFNB
20264.24%0.69%
202512.02%2.81%
202411.10%3.25%
20235.50%3.49%
202213.28%3.68%
202110.93%3.96%
20203.93%5.05%
20193.35%3.78%
20184.20%4.88%
20171.98%6.75%
20167.39%2.99%
20157.79%3.60%
201438.37%3.60%
20134.95%3.80%
201215.19%4.52%
20116.37%4.24%
20107.42%4.89%
20091.89%7.07%
20082.69%7.27%
20072.30%6.46%
20062.35%5.15%
200510.30%5.33%
20044.15%86.30%
20031.58%2.34%
20029.88%2.33%
20010.00%2.13%
20003.55%2.95%
19992.34%0.81%

Select Stocks to Compare