StockComparison Logo
vs

CHMG vs WSBF

Comparison between Chemung Financial Corp (CHMG, Company) and Waterstone Financial Inc (WSBF, Company).

Both CHMG and WSBF are from the Financial Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceCHMG has outperformed WSBF, delivering a return of +13.7% compared to +5.8%

CHMG vs WSBF - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
CHMG
$359M
WSBF
$359M
Max Drawdown
Winner
CHMG
59.08%
WSBF
90.63%
Sharpe Ratio
CHMG
1.61
Winner
WSBF
1.77
5Y Beta
CHMG
0.64
Winner
WSBF
0.52
Industry
CHMG
Banks - Regional
WSBF
Banks - Regional
P/E Ratio
CHMG
21.62
Winner
WSBF
12.44
Forward P/E
Winner
CHMG
9.29
WSBF
20.70
PEG Ratio
Winner
CHMG
0.00
WSBF
0.19
Dividend Yield
CHMG
1.80%
Winner
WSBF
3.18%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
CHMG
9.04%
WSBF
-2.19%
5Y EPS CAGR
Winner
CHMG
5.63%
WSBF
-17.57%
Debt to Equity
Winner
CHMG
0.00%
WSBF
118.62%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
CHMG
12.78%
WSBF
-1.42%
P/S Ratio
CHMG
3.76
Winner
WSBF
2.40
P/B Ratio
CHMG
1.36
Winner
WSBF
1.03

CHMG vs WSBF - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
CHMG
+9.04%
Winner
WSBF
+9.70%
3M
Winner
CHMG
+39.35%
WSBF
+12.29%
6M
Winner
CHMG
+38.37%
WSBF
+26.18%
1Y
Winner
CHMG
+58.21%
WSBF
+51.83%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
CHMG
+13.72%
WSBF
+5.75%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
CHMG
+13.52%
WSBF
+9.01%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
CHMG
+7.90%
WSBF
+6.32%

CHMG vs WSBF - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCHMGWSBF
2026+40.27%+25.95%
2025+20.27%+32.10%
2024+0.43%+0.08%
2023+12.85%-14.51%
2022+3.83%-16.42%
2021+40.45%+24.78%
2020-16.42%+7.67%
2019+3.75%+20.35%
2018-14.18%+3.40%
2017+38.89%-3.47%
2016+35.58%+34.85%
2015+2.58%+9.96%
2014-13.22%+32.45%
2013+16.28%+36.87%
2012+31.29%+306.26%
2011+6.93%-42.02%
2010+10.31%+37.71%
2009+6.19%-40.41%
2008-26.47%-73.41%
2007-11.08%-27.94%
2006+8.38%+54.15%
2005-2.74%+1.69%
2004-4.97%N/A
2003+42.07%N/A
2002-4.59%N/A
2001+55.66%N/A
2000-17.46%N/A
1999+0.82%N/A

CHMG vs WSBF Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CHMG was -55.13%, occurring on Mar 16, 2020. Recovery took 1162 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for WSBF was -90.63%, occurring on Dec 17, 2009. Recovery took 2492 trading sessions.

RankCHMGWSBF
#1-55.13%
Dec 18, 2017 - Aug 2, 2022
-90.63%
Sep 18, 2006 - Aug 11, 2016
#2-51.75%
Dec 24, 2003 - Dec 10, 2012
-51.09%
Jan 6, 2022 - Jan 22, 2026
#3-34.59%
Feb 2, 2023 - Jul 17, 2024
-33.12%
Dec 17, 2019 - Nov 16, 2020
#4-28.00%
Dec 30, 1999 - Jun 26, 2001
-16.14%
Oct 27, 2017 - Oct 24, 2019
#5-25.12%
Dec 6, 2024 - Aug 28, 2025
-11.30%
Jun 9, 2017 - Sep 27, 2017
#6-22.82%
Jan 21, 2014 - May 24, 2016
-10.58%
Oct 6, 2005 - Nov 30, 2005
#7-20.63%
Feb 9, 2026 - Apr 20, 2026
-8.79%
Dec 9, 2016 - Feb 16, 2017
#8-17.56%
Dec 6, 2001 - May 16, 2003
-8.59%
Feb 16, 2017 - Apr 24, 2017
#9-15.92%
May 25, 2016 - Dec 5, 2016
-7.97%
Jun 30, 2006 - Aug 29, 2006
#10-14.19%
Aug 2, 2022 - Jan 20, 2023
-7.19%
Jan 22, 2026 - Jan 29, 2026
#11-13.86%
Oct 18, 2013 - Jan 21, 2014
-7.18%
Apr 12, 2021 - Aug 6, 2021
#12-13.03%
Jul 17, 2024 - Nov 6, 2024
-6.98%
Feb 2, 2026 - Apr 9, 2026
#13-11.46%
Jun 27, 2013 - Sep 20, 2013
-6.33%
May 3, 2017 - Jun 9, 2017
#14-10.94%
Dec 21, 2016 - Feb 13, 2017
-6.07%
Nov 12, 2021 - Jan 4, 2022
#15-10.93%
Dec 18, 2025 - Jan 30, 2026
-5.91%
Jan 14, 2021 - Feb 10, 2021

Correlation

Correlation between CHMG and WSBF is 0.87 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.87
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

CHMG vs WSBF dividend yield comparison.

YearCHMGWSBF
20260.90%1.57%
20252.37%3.63%
20242.54%4.46%
20232.49%5.28%
20222.70%7.54%
20212.56%5.95%
20203.06%6.80%
20192.45%5.15%
20182.52%5.85%
20172.16%5.75%
20162.86%1.41%
20153.78%1.42%
20143.76%1.14%
20133.04%0.00%
20123.35%0.00%
20114.41%0.00%
20104.44%0.00%
20096.11%0.00%
20083.75%0.00%
20073.46%0.00%
20063.00%0.00%
20053.11%0.00%
20042.84%0.00%
20032.49%0.00%
20023.41%0.00%
20013.08%0.00%
20004.47%0.00%
19990.86%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare