StockComparison Logo
vs

BCH vs SQM

Comparison between Banco de Chile (BCH, Company) and Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM, Company).

BCH is from the Financial Services sector, while SQM is from the Basic Materials sector.

5-Year PerformanceBCH has outperformed SQM, delivering a return of +27.5% compared to +15.2%

BCH vs SQM - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
BCH
$20B
SQM
$20B
Max Drawdown
Winner
BCH
60.40%
SQM
80.45%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
BCH
1.48
SQM
1.46
5Y Beta
Winner
BCH
0.67
SQM
0.95
Industry
BCH
Banks - Regional
SQM
Specialty Chemicals
P/E Ratio
Winner
BCH
15.42
SQM
24.88
Forward P/E
BCH
15.04
Winner
SQM
11.07
PEG Ratio
BCH
5.50
Winner
SQM
0.70
Dividend Yield
Winner
BCH
5.33%
SQM
1.31%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
BCH
29.96%
SQM
15.24%
5Y EPS CAGR
BCH
15.31%
Winner
SQM
32.32%
Debt to Equity
Winner
BCH
0.00%
SQM
88.99%
Free Cash Flow Yield
BCH
-0.34%
Winner
SQM
5.31%
P/S Ratio
BCH
6.13
Winner
SQM
4.01
P/B Ratio
Winner
BCH
3.33
SQM
3.56

BCH vs SQM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
BCH
+3.56%
Winner
SQM
+19.06%
3M
Winner
BCH
+11.85%
SQM
+3.37%
6M
BCH
+3.61%
Winner
SQM
+15.34%
1Y
BCH
+56.18%
Winner
SQM
+83.50%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
BCH
+27.52%
SQM
+15.19%
10Y(CAGR)
BCH
+13.11%
Winner
SQM
+17.01%
Max(CAGR)
BCH
+14.81%
Winner
SQM
+17.92%

BCH vs SQM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearBCHSQM
2026+17.23%+18.86%
2025+82.52%+91.19%
2024+6.83%-38.56%
2023+29.66%-15.40%
2022+36.18%+70.49%
2021-22.16%+2.60%
2020-2.22%+87.42%
2019-25.04%-27.79%
2018-10.32%-35.04%
2017+46.06%+113.53%
2016+27.81%+61.04%
2015-7.53%-20.43%
2014-7.39%-1.99%
2013-2.95%-54.46%
2012+22.89%+7.62%
2011-2.71%-7.72%
2010+69.31%+53.00%
2009+83.04%+51.16%
2008-26.05%+46.55%
2007-2.48%+33.91%
2006+39.58%+23.39%
2005+11.35%+82.30%
2004+42.38%+52.01%
2003+81.09%+94.94%
2002-19.22%-8.87%
2001N/A+19.25%
2000N/A-10.37%
1999N/A+9.77%

BCH vs SQM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for BCH was -57.70%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 1564 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for SQM was -78.36%, occurring on Jul 27, 2015. Recovery took 1547 trading sessions.

The current BCH drawdown is -3.38%. The current SQM drawdown is -16.53%.

RankBCHSQM
#1-57.70%
Feb 23, 2018 - May 13, 2024
-78.36%
Jul 22, 2011 - Sep 14, 2017
#2-57.63%
Mar 18, 2008 - Nov 13, 2009
-73.00%
Jan 11, 2018 - Jan 6, 2021
#3-28.39%
Sep 18, 2013 - Mar 16, 2017
-72.14%
Jun 18, 2008 - Nov 4, 2010
#4-27.46%
Mar 15, 2002 - Apr 16, 2003
-69.81%
Sep 14, 2022 - Jun 2, 2025
#5-26.16%
Jul 18, 2011 - Jan 20, 2012
-35.54%
Feb 4, 2000 - May 17, 2002
#6-20.23%
Feb 18, 2004 - Jul 16, 2004
-31.32%
Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 21, 2006
#7-20.20%
Jan 8, 2002 - Mar 15, 2002
-30.96%
Jan 12, 2021 - Nov 2, 2021
#8-19.96%
Feb 3, 2026 - May 13, 2026
-29.41%
Nov 22, 2021 - Feb 15, 2022
#9-19.32%
Jun 29, 2007 - Jan 31, 2008
-27.46%
Oct 21, 2003 - Aug 26, 2004
#10-15.56%
Oct 10, 2017 - Dec 18, 2017
-26.31%
May 27, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022
#11-15.38%
Mar 20, 2012 - Dec 11, 2012
-26.31%
Oct 11, 2007 - Feb 27, 2008
#12-14.58%
Jan 20, 2010 - Mar 4, 2010
-24.67%
May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2003
#13-14.50%
Oct 22, 2003 - Jan 9, 2004
-19.95%
Jul 2, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007
#14-14.36%
Feb 13, 2013 - Sep 18, 2013
-19.89%
Apr 4, 2022 - May 17, 2022
#15-13.79%
May 14, 2025 - Oct 15, 2025
-19.15%
Aug 15, 2022 - Sep 14, 2022

Correlation

Correlation between BCH and SQM is 0.75 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.75
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

BCH vs SQM dividend yield comparison.

YearBCHSQM
20265.18%1.26%
20255.54%0.18%
20247.46%0.59%
20239.01%8.34%
20226.39%9.66%
20213.76%3.92%
20203.95%1.64%
20195.04%4.55%
20183.55%5.37%
20172.20%2.73%
20163.32%4.77%
20154.35%2.00%
201411.94%4.71%
20136.00%3.21%
20124.58%1.69%
20115.61%1.40%
20103.52%0.87%
20095.92%2.70%
200810.98%3.71%
20076.32%2.01%
20064.95%1.76%
20054.52%1.49%
20043.78%1.21%
20031.72%1.20%
20021.88%1.88%
20010.00%2.16%
20000.00%42.10%

Select Stocks to Compare