WTM vs GRFS
Comparison between White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd (WTM, Company) and Grifols SA (GRFS, Company).
WTM is from the Financial Services sector, while GRFS is from the Healthcare sector.
5-Year PerformanceWTM has outperformed GRFS, delivering a return of +12.3% compared to -14.4%
WTM vs GRFS - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
WTM vs GRFS - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
WTM vs GRFS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | WTM | GRFS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +5.09% | -11.36% |
| 2025 | +7.78% | +26.06% |
| 2024 | +28.89% | -32.67% |
| 2023 | +7.82% | +32.27% |
| 2022 | +40.13% | -26.98% |
| 2021 | +0.02% | -39.47% |
| 2020 | -10.78% | -21.16% |
| 2019 | +30.61% | +31.32% |
| 2018 | +1.26% | -19.94% |
| 2017 | +0.31% | +44.23% |
| 2016 | +16.25% | +2.30% |
| 2015 | +15.17% | -3.95% |
| 2014 | +5.05% | -1.76% |
| 2013 | +15.41% | +42.07% |
| 2012 | +13.20% | +158.95% |
| 2011 | +32.29% | -12.53% |
| 2010 | +0.31% | N/A |
| 2009 | +27.07% | N/A |
| 2008 | -46.61% | N/A |
| 2007 | -10.07% | N/A |
| 2006 | +5.94% | N/A |
| 2005 | -10.36% | N/A |
| 2004 | +42.59% | N/A |
| 2003 | +42.62% | N/A |
| 2002 | -7.44% | N/A |
| 2001 | +10.58% | N/A |
| 2000 | +172.82% | N/A |
| 1999 | -4.04% | N/A |
WTM vs GRFS Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for WTM was -77.48%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 2327 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for GRFS was -78.00%, occurring on Mar 6, 2024. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current WTM drawdown is -7.53%. The current GRFS drawdown is -66.52%.
| Rank | WTM | GRFS |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -77.48% Sep 8, 2005 - Dec 5, 2014 | -78.00% Feb 21, 2020 - Mar 6, 2024 |
| #2 | -40.16% Feb 11, 2020 - Feb 10, 2021 | -38.75% Jul 21, 2011 - Feb 2, 2012 |
| #3 | -27.02% Jun 21, 2001 - May 12, 2003 | -37.14% Jun 9, 2014 - Jun 21, 2017 |
| #4 | -22.07% Feb 22, 2021 - Jun 7, 2022 | -28.71% Jun 12, 2018 - Jan 7, 2020 |
| #5 | -18.77% Nov 1, 1999 - Mar 14, 2000 | -19.20% Jan 16, 2018 - Jun 12, 2018 |
| #6 | -18.05% Nov 25, 2024 - Nov 26, 2025 | -16.59% Apr 30, 2013 - Jul 25, 2013 |
| #7 | -16.59% Mar 1, 2017 - Sep 14, 2018 | -16.32% May 3, 2012 - Jul 3, 2012 |
| #8 | -16.37% Mar 11, 2005 - Aug 19, 2005 | -14.48% Mar 12, 2014 - Jun 5, 2014 |
| #9 | -15.67% Apr 6, 2004 - Nov 18, 2004 | -12.71% Aug 2, 2013 - Nov 21, 2013 |
| #10 | -15.54% Sep 8, 2022 - Oct 28, 2022 | -11.16% Jun 22, 2017 - Oct 31, 2017 |
| #11 | -14.93% Feb 17, 2023 - Jul 20, 2023 | -9.82% Nov 2, 2012 - Dec 21, 2012 |
| #12 | -14.80% Sep 14, 2018 - May 31, 2019 | -9.72% Jul 31, 2012 - Sep 21, 2012 |
| #13 | -13.91% Jun 16, 2003 - Oct 3, 2003 | -9.54% Jun 2, 2011 - Jul 15, 2011 |
| #14 | -13.43% Nov 30, 2015 - Apr 1, 2016 | -9.35% Nov 3, 2017 - Jan 5, 2018 |
| #15 | -12.42% Sep 29, 2000 - Nov 10, 2000 | -8.56% Jan 10, 2020 - Feb 18, 2020 |
Correlation
Correlation between WTM and GRFS is -0.33 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
WTM vs GRFS dividend yield comparison.
| Year | WTM | GRFS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.05% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 0.05% | 1.88% |
| 2024 | 0.05% | 0.00% |
| 2023 | 0.07% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 0.07% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 0.10% | 3.20% |
| 2020 | 0.10% | 0.83% |
| 2019 | 0.09% | 1.55% |
| 2018 | 0.12% | 2.32% |
| 2017 | 0.12% | 1.24% |
| 2016 | 0.12% | 1.67% |
| 2015 | 0.14% | 2.01% |
| 2014 | 0.16% | 1.32% |
| 2013 | 0.17% | 0.60% |
| 2012 | 0.19% | 4.50% |
| 2011 | 0.22% | 9.37% |
| 2010 | 0.30% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 0.30% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 3.00% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 1.56% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 1.38% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 1.43% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 0.15% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 0.22% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 0.31% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 0.29% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 0.25% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.33% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks