WDC vs TM
Comparison between Western Digital Corp (WDC, Company) and Toyota Motor Corporation (TM, Company).
WDC is from the Technology sector, while TM is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.
5-Year PerformanceWDC has outperformed TM, delivering a return of +66.2% compared to +1.2%
WDC vs TM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
WDC vs TM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
WDC vs TM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | WDC | TM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +260.10% | -23.58% |
| 2025 | +269.75% | +14.71% |
| 2024 | +17.24% | +10.10% |
| 2023 | +66.73% | +36.47% |
| 2022 | -52.15% | -24.81% |
| 2021 | +24.85% | +24.20% |
| 2020 | -14.49% | +12.26% |
| 2019 | +71.05% | +22.49% |
| 2018 | -53.00% | -6.75% |
| 2017 | +17.26% | +10.83% |
| 2016 | +16.79% | -0.23% |
| 2015 | -44.17% | +3.20% |
| 2014 | +35.98% | +7.00% |
| 2013 | +96.41% | +29.82% |
| 2012 | +38.95% | +40.05% |
| 2011 | -9.34% | -15.35% |
| 2010 | -25.10% | -6.33% |
| 2009 | +258.07% | +28.90% |
| 2008 | -59.96% | -36.78% |
| 2007 | +47.80% | -20.02% |
| 2006 | +7.57% | +28.83% |
| 2005 | +73.28% | +30.52% |
| 2004 | -11.58% | +20.14% |
| 2003 | +71.62% | +29.25% |
| 2002 | +4.07% | +4.74% |
| 2001 | +171.07% | -18.72% |
| 2000 | -38.12% | -34.77% |
| 1999 | +34.01% | +42.68% |
WDC vs TM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for WDC was -76.57%, occurring on Sep 27, 2001. Recovery took 675 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for TM was -60.16%, occurring on Apr 14, 2003. Recovery took 1423 trading sessions.
The current WDC drawdown is -9.49%. The current TM drawdown is -32.94%.
| Rank | WDC | TM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -76.57% Mar 23, 2000 - Dec 2, 2002 | -60.16% Apr 25, 2000 - Dec 21, 2005 |
| #2 | -75.16% Jun 5, 2008 - Dec 16, 2009 | -56.11% Jan 4, 2007 - May 13, 2013 |
| #3 | -70.53% Mar 16, 2018 - Jul 31, 2025 | -36.79% Jan 13, 2022 - Jan 19, 2024 |
| #4 | -67.70% Dec 22, 2014 - Mar 16, 2018 | -34.92% Mar 27, 2024 - Feb 4, 2026 |
| #5 | -56.04% Oct 7, 2003 - May 27, 2005 | -32.94% Feb 13, 2026 - Jun 25, 2026 |
| #6 | -49.20% Jan 6, 2010 - Jan 22, 2013 | -27.92% Mar 30, 2015 - Jan 3, 2018 |
| #7 | -41.12% Jan 19, 2000 - Mar 13, 2000 | -25.20% Nov 11, 2019 - Nov 11, 2020 |
| #8 | -34.30% Jul 7, 2003 - Sep 19, 2003 | -22.65% May 5, 2006 - Nov 8, 2006 |
| #9 | -33.62% Feb 17, 2006 - Sep 21, 2007 | -20.90% Aug 2, 2013 - Jan 22, 2015 |
| #10 | -28.99% Dec 2, 2002 - Mar 27, 2003 | -18.07% May 10, 2018 - Sep 13, 2019 |
| #11 | -28.84% Jun 7, 2005 - Dec 21, 2005 | -17.21% Dec 31, 1999 - Mar 27, 2000 |
| #12 | -25.28% Dec 10, 2007 - Feb 25, 2008 | -11.75% May 21, 2013 - Jul 17, 2013 |
| #13 | -23.32% Jan 7, 2000 - Jan 19, 2000 | -11.53% Jan 17, 2018 - May 10, 2018 |
| #14 | -21.48% Feb 26, 2008 - May 15, 2008 | -11.45% Aug 3, 2021 - Sep 27, 2021 |
| #15 | -20.59% Mar 19, 2026 - Apr 8, 2026 | -9.96% Sep 29, 2021 - Nov 16, 2021 |
Correlation
Correlation between WDC and TM is 0.52 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
WDC vs TM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | WDC | TM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.04% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 0.19% | 2.95% |
| 2024 | 0.00% | 2.81% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 2.45% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 2.90% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 2.45% |
| 2020 | 1.81% | 2.74% |
| 2019 | 2.36% | 1.30% |
| 2018 | 5.41% | 3.40% |
| 2017 | 2.51% | 2.96% |
| 2016 | 2.94% | 3.23% |
| 2015 | 3.33% | 5.59% |
| 2014 | 1.35% | 2.57% |
| 2013 | 1.25% | 2.08% |
| 2012 | 1.18% | 1.59% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 1.90% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 1.31% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 1.41% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 4.19% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 2.19% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 1.99% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 1.17% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 1.07% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 0.91% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 1.21% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 0.72% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 0.93% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks