TM vs NVO
Comparison between Toyota Motor Corporation (TM, Company) and Novo Nordisk (NVO, Company).
TM is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while NVO is from the Healthcare sector.
5-Year PerformanceNVO has outperformed TM, delivering a return of +5.0% compared to +1.2%
TM vs NVO - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
TM vs NVO - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
TM vs NVO - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | TM | NVO |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -23.58% | -5.93% |
| 2025 | +14.71% | -40.30% |
| 2024 | +10.10% | -14.82% |
| 2023 | +36.47% | +52.98% |
| 2022 | -24.81% | +26.30% |
| 2021 | +24.20% | +59.85% |
| 2020 | +12.26% | +22.30% |
| 2019 | +22.49% | +26.72% |
| 2018 | -6.75% | -13.76% |
| 2017 | +10.83% | +52.70% |
| 2016 | -0.23% | -36.16% |
| 2015 | +3.20% | +38.20% |
| 2014 | +7.00% | +16.84% |
| 2013 | +29.82% | +12.95% |
| 2012 | +40.05% | +41.35% |
| 2011 | -15.35% | +4.80% |
| 2010 | -6.33% | +73.64% |
| 2009 | +28.90% | +22.93% |
| 2008 | -36.78% | -18.66% |
| 2007 | -20.02% | +57.08% |
| 2006 | +28.83% | +48.69% |
| 2005 | +30.52% | +7.34% |
| 2004 | +20.14% | +33.06% |
| 2003 | +29.25% | +40.89% |
| 2002 | +4.74% | -27.39% |
| 2001 | -18.72% | +13.36% |
| 2000 | -34.77% | +32.47% |
| 1999 | +42.68% | +6.16% |
TM vs NVO Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for TM was -60.16%, occurring on Apr 14, 2003. Recovery took 1423 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for NVO was -74.71%, occurring on Mar 27, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current TM drawdown is -32.94%. The current NVO drawdown is -65.42%.
| Rank | TM | NVO |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -60.16% Apr 25, 2000 - Dec 21, 2005 | -74.71% Jun 25, 2024 - Mar 27, 2026 |
| #2 | -56.11% Jan 4, 2007 - May 13, 2013 | -51.38% Aug 6, 2001 - Feb 9, 2004 |
| #3 | -36.79% Jan 13, 2022 - Jan 19, 2024 | -46.53% Aug 3, 2015 - Jan 19, 2018 |
| #4 | -34.92% Mar 27, 2024 - Feb 4, 2026 | -41.56% Apr 8, 2008 - Feb 16, 2010 |
| #5 | -32.94% Feb 13, 2026 - Jun 25, 2026 | -28.04% Apr 21, 2011 - Feb 7, 2012 |
| #6 | -27.92% Mar 30, 2015 - Jan 3, 2018 | -27.56% Jan 26, 2018 - Nov 1, 2019 |
| #7 | -25.20% Nov 11, 2019 - Nov 11, 2020 | -26.73% Sep 26, 2000 - Jun 20, 2001 |
| #8 | -22.65% May 5, 2006 - Nov 8, 2006 | -23.65% Mar 4, 2020 - Apr 20, 2020 |
| #9 | -20.90% Aug 2, 2013 - Jan 22, 2015 | -21.43% Feb 6, 2013 - Jan 10, 2014 |
| #10 | -18.07% May 10, 2018 - Sep 13, 2019 | -21.36% Apr 7, 2022 - Nov 28, 2022 |
| #11 | -17.21% Dec 31, 1999 - Mar 27, 2000 | -20.48% Dec 16, 2021 - Apr 6, 2022 |
| #12 | -11.75% May 21, 2013 - Jul 17, 2013 | -19.00% Apr 21, 2005 - Mar 3, 2006 |
| #13 | -11.53% Jan 17, 2018 - May 10, 2018 | -16.44% Jan 10, 2000 - May 3, 2000 |
| #14 | -11.45% Aug 3, 2021 - Sep 27, 2021 | -14.94% Dec 4, 2007 - Feb 22, 2008 |
| #15 | -9.96% Sep 29, 2021 - Nov 16, 2021 | -14.66% Oct 22, 2012 - Jan 10, 2013 |
Correlation
Correlation between TM and NVO is 0.87 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
TM vs NVO dividend yield comparison.
| Year | TM | NVO |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 2.56% |
| 2025 | 2.95% | 3.31% |
| 2024 | 2.81% | 1.68% |
| 2023 | 2.45% | 1.00% |
| 2022 | 2.90% | 1.20% |
| 2021 | 2.45% | 1.35% |
| 2020 | 2.74% | 1.87% |
| 2019 | 1.30% | 2.14% |
| 2018 | 3.40% | 1.45% |
| 2017 | 2.96% | 1.52% |
| 2016 | 3.23% | 2.87% |
| 2015 | 5.59% | 0.92% |
| 2014 | 2.57% | 1.43% |
| 2013 | 2.08% | 1.23% |
| 2012 | 1.59% | 1.12% |
| 2011 | 1.90% | 1.18% |
| 2010 | 1.31% | 0.87% |
| 2009 | 1.41% | 1.22% |
| 2008 | 4.19% | 1.32% |
| 2007 | 2.19% | 0.69% |
| 2006 | 1.99% | 0.83% |
| 2005 | 1.17% | 1.10% |
| 2004 | 1.07% | 0.96% |
| 2003 | 0.91% | 0.92% |
| 2002 | 1.21% | 0.98% |
| 2001 | 0.72% | 0.57% |
| 2000 | 0.93% | 0.53% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks