StockComparison Logo
vs

USLM vs CBU

Comparison between United States Lime & Minerals Inc (USLM, Company) and Community Bank System Inc (CBU, Company).

USLM is from the Basic Materials sector, while CBU is from the Financial Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceUSLM has outperformed CBU, delivering a return of +31.5% compared to +0.5%

USLM vs CBU - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
USLM
$3.42B
Winner
CBU
$3.43B
Max Drawdown
USLM
64.71%
Winner
CBU
54.44%
Sharpe Ratio
USLM
0.25
Winner
CBU
0.67
5Y Beta
USLM
1.22
Winner
CBU
0.86
Industry
USLM
Building Materials
CBU
Banks - Regional
P/E Ratio
USLM
25.38
Winner
CBU
15.25
Forward P/E
Winner
USLM
15.24
CBU
15.77
PEG Ratio
USLM
1.60
Winner
CBU
0.65
Dividend Yield
USLM
0.20%
Winner
CBU
2.94%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
USLM
18.57%
CBU
2.28%
5Y EPS CAGR
Winner
USLM
37.75%
CBU
5.39%
Debt to Equity
USLM
0.00%
CBU
0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield
USLM
2.68%
Winner
CBU
7.20%

USLM vs CBU - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
USLM
+13.62%
CBU
-2.98%
3M
USLM
+7.42%
Winner
CBU
+7.98%
6M
Winner
USLM
+8.36%
CBU
+0.53%
1Y
USLM
-4.19%
Winner
CBU
+15.16%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
USLM
+31.52%
CBU
+0.47%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
USLM
+26.34%
CBU
+6.88%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
USLM
+18.46%
CBU
+9.81%

USLM vs CBU - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearUSLMCBU
2026-2.83%+14.79%
2025-1.75%-2.88%
2024+189.33%+21.47%
2023+68.82%-13.25%
2022+8.82%-13.90%
2021+12.51%+22.82%
2020+28.58%-9.71%
2019+33.64%+22.82%
2018-7.86%+10.84%
2017+4.41%-10.99%
2016+38.83%+64.39%
2015-22.95%+9.46%
2014+22.01%+0.74%
2013+23.60%+44.86%
2012-24.29%+0.56%
2011+36.92%+2.57%
2010+24.13%+47.64%
2009+38.12%-14.82%
2008-22.29%+29.07%
2007+1.47%-11.56%
2006+15.69%+4.38%
2005+136.55%-14.00%
2004+54.00%+19.34%
2003+80.11%+58.16%
2002-29.97%+24.44%
2001+15.25%+8.33%
2000-26.20%+12.98%
1999-8.63%-11.65%

USLM vs CBU Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for USLM was -62.52%, occurring on Apr 11, 2003. Recovery took 932 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CBU was -53.42%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 568 trading sessions.

The current USLM drawdown is -25.19%. The current CBU drawdown is -7.49%.

RankUSLMCBU
#1-62.52%
Mar 14, 2000 - Nov 28, 2003
-53.42%
Sep 19, 2008 - Dec 21, 2010
#2-58.98%
Jun 23, 2008 - Jul 15, 2009
-51.06%
Mar 12, 2021 - Jul 16, 2026
#3-45.87%
Nov 26, 2024 - Mar 10, 2025
-34.00%
Dec 31, 2004 - Mar 20, 2008
#4-38.36%
Nov 12, 2014 - Nov 23, 2016
-31.84%
Jan 16, 2020 - Jan 22, 2021
#5-37.72%
Feb 3, 2012 - Jun 9, 2014
-23.48%
Nov 19, 1999 - Sep 27, 2000
#6-35.13%
Sep 27, 2005 - Aug 28, 2006
-23.21%
Jan 23, 2004 - Aug 27, 2004
#7-34.95%
Dec 4, 2019 - Aug 12, 2020
-22.89%
Apr 28, 2008 - Sep 18, 2008
#8-33.44%
Mar 10, 2021 - Feb 6, 2023
-22.13%
Dec 22, 2010 - Dec 22, 2011
#9-32.71%
Mar 15, 2005 - Jun 10, 2005
-20.32%
Jan 4, 2017 - May 17, 2018
#10-30.26%
Oct 17, 2017 - Nov 25, 2019
-19.44%
Nov 30, 2015 - Jun 23, 2016
#11-30.08%
Jul 1, 2004 - Jan 31, 2005
-18.57%
May 3, 2002 - Jan 13, 2003
#12-29.47%
Jul 21, 2009 - Oct 14, 2011
-17.22%
Aug 22, 2018 - Apr 24, 2019
#13-27.05%
Jul 10, 2007 - Jun 9, 2008
-16.51%
Dec 26, 2013 - Jun 26, 2015
#14-23.04%
Jan 20, 2004 - Jun 16, 2004
-15.18%
Aug 21, 2001 - Feb 22, 2002
#15-20.85%
Nov 17, 1999 - Mar 2, 2000
-14.91%
Sep 27, 2000 - Jan 4, 2001

Correlation

Correlation between USLM and CBU is 0.66 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.66
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

USLM vs CBU dividend yield comparison.

YearUSLMCBU
20260.10%1.43%
20250.20%3.24%
20240.15%2.95%
20230.35%3.42%
20220.57%2.76%
20210.50%2.28%
20200.56%2.66%
20196.52%2.23%
20180.76%2.47%
20170.70%2.46%
20160.66%2.04%
20150.91%3.05%
20140.69%3.04%
20130.00%2.77%
20120.00%3.87%
20110.00%3.60%
20100.00%3.38%
20090.00%4.56%
20080.00%3.53%
20070.00%4.13%
20060.00%3.39%
20050.00%3.28%
20040.00%2.41%
20030.74%2.49%
20022.70%3.57%
20011.77%4.12%
20002.00%4.20%
19990.36%1.08%

Select Stocks to Compare