UNM vs CSL
Comparison between Unum Group (UNM, Company) and Carlisle Companies Inc (CSL, Company).
UNM is from the Financial Services sector, while CSL is from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformanceUNM has outperformed CSL, delivering a return of +31.2% compared to +16.3%
UNM vs CSL - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
UNM vs CSL - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
UNM vs CSL - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | UNM | CSL |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +17.91% | +10.55% |
| 2025 | +8.70% | -11.66% |
| 2024 | +64.57% | +20.08% |
| 2023 | +15.86% | +35.04% |
| 2022 | +68.61% | -3.01% |
| 2021 | +16.16% | +62.98% |
| 2020 | -17.67% | -3.31% |
| 2019 | +0.31% | +62.36% |
| 2018 | -45.20% | -12.87% |
| 2017 | +26.17% | +5.48% |
| 2016 | +37.36% | +29.32% |
| 2015 | -2.19% | -0.33% |
| 2014 | +3.48% | +16.22% |
| 2013 | +66.69% | +32.88% |
| 2012 | -1.07% | +30.90% |
| 2011 | -13.80% | +11.21% |
| 2010 | +23.35% | +15.36% |
| 2009 | +7.88% | +64.68% |
| 2008 | -19.23% | -43.52% |
| 2007 | +15.94% | -5.44% |
| 2006 | -8.85% | +13.24% |
| 2005 | +32.04% | +10.86% |
| 2004 | +13.71% | +8.11% |
| 2003 | -11.11% | +44.81% |
| 2002 | -32.10% | +17.03% |
| 2001 | +6.71% | -9.48% |
| 2000 | -9.50% | +26.79% |
| 1999 | +2.63% | +10.53% |
UNM vs CSL Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for UNM was -81.88%, occurring on Mar 11, 2003. Recovery took 3347 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CSL was -64.55%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 918 trading sessions.
The current UNM drawdown is -2.97%. The current CSL drawdown is -23.44%.
| Rank | UNM | CSL |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -81.88% Nov 19, 1999 - Mar 14, 2013 | -64.55% Sep 4, 2007 - Apr 26, 2011 |
| #2 | -81.07% Jan 12, 2018 - Jun 29, 2023 | -45.55% Jun 29, 2000 - Oct 8, 2003 |
| #3 | -34.97% Jul 29, 2015 - May 27, 2016 | -39.12% May 10, 2011 - Feb 21, 2012 |
| #4 | -18.77% May 31, 2016 - Oct 12, 2016 | -38.68% Jan 2, 2020 - Mar 25, 2021 |
| #5 | -17.95% Oct 17, 2023 - Mar 7, 2024 | -37.71% Oct 14, 2024 - Nov 20, 2025 |
| #6 | -16.84% Mar 24, 2025 - Apr 29, 2026 | -34.51% Aug 18, 2022 - Dec 15, 2023 |
| #7 | -14.79% Sep 2, 2014 - Jun 10, 2015 | -27.39% Aug 29, 2018 - Apr 18, 2019 |
| #8 | -12.26% Dec 26, 2013 - Mar 4, 2014 | -25.34% Aug 17, 2015 - Apr 27, 2016 |
| #9 | -11.78% Mar 1, 2017 - Jul 28, 2017 | -19.70% May 18, 2005 - Feb 9, 2006 |
| #10 | -11.16% Aug 1, 2013 - Nov 8, 2013 | -19.47% Nov 25, 2016 - Nov 29, 2017 |
| #11 | -10.05% Apr 3, 2024 - Jul 17, 2024 | -17.69% Jan 8, 2018 - Jul 25, 2018 |
| #12 | -9.58% Mar 10, 2014 - Aug 26, 2014 | -15.01% May 4, 2022 - Jul 28, 2022 |
| #13 | -8.60% Aug 4, 2017 - Sep 27, 2017 | -14.86% Jun 10, 2014 - Oct 30, 2014 |
| #14 | -8.51% Nov 27, 2024 - Jan 29, 2025 | -14.45% Jul 16, 2024 - Sep 23, 2024 |
| #15 | -8.42% Mar 28, 2013 - May 8, 2013 | -13.99% Jul 16, 2004 - Feb 3, 2005 |
Correlation
Correlation between UNM and CSL is 0.89 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
UNM vs CSL dividend yield comparison.
| Year | UNM | CSL |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.02% | 0.61% |
| 2025 | 2.27% | 1.31% |
| 2024 | 2.15% | 1.00% |
| 2023 | 3.07% | 1.02% |
| 2022 | 3.07% | 1.09% |
| 2021 | 4.76% | 0.86% |
| 2020 | 4.97% | 1.31% |
| 2019 | 3.74% | 1.11% |
| 2018 | 3.34% | 1.53% |
| 2017 | 1.57% | 1.27% |
| 2016 | 1.75% | 1.18% |
| 2015 | 2.10% | 1.24% |
| 2014 | 1.78% | 1.04% |
| 2013 | 1.57% | 1.06% |
| 2012 | 2.26% | 1.29% |
| 2011 | 1.87% | 1.58% |
| 2010 | 1.45% | 1.66% |
| 2009 | 1.61% | 1.84% |
| 2008 | 1.61% | 2.90% |
| 2007 | 1.26% | 1.51% |
| 2006 | 1.44% | 1.32% |
| 2005 | 1.32% | 1.39% |
| 2004 | 1.67% | 1.39% |
| 2003 | 2.36% | 1.43% |
| 2002 | 3.36% | 2.05% |
| 2001 | 2.23% | 2.22% |
| 2000 | 2.19% | 1.77% |
| 1999 | 0.46% | 0.50% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks