UNM vs BSAC
Comparison between Unum Group (UNM, Company) and Banco Santander Chile SA (BSAC, Company).
Both UNM and BSAC are from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceUNM has outperformed BSAC, delivering a return of +25.4% compared to +11.2%
UNM vs BSAC - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
UNM vs BSAC - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
UNM vs BSAC - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | UNM | BSAC |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +6.98% | +1.26% |
| 2025 | +8.70% | +75.73% |
| 2024 | +64.57% | +1.27% |
| 2023 | +15.86% | +36.36% |
| 2022 | +68.61% | +0.45% |
| 2021 | +16.16% | -14.92% |
| 2020 | -17.67% | -15.33% |
| 2019 | +0.31% | -20.04% |
| 2018 | -45.20% | -3.62% |
| 2017 | +26.17% | +47.27% |
| 2016 | +37.36% | +31.66% |
| 2015 | -2.19% | -5.55% |
| 2014 | +3.48% | -11.95% |
| 2013 | +66.69% | -15.15% |
| 2012 | -1.07% | -0.00% |
| 2011 | -13.80% | -17.23% |
| 2010 | +23.35% | +48.68% |
| 2009 | +7.88% | +88.68% |
| 2008 | -19.23% | -28.46% |
| 2007 | +15.94% | +8.49% |
| 2006 | -8.85% | +10.31% |
| 2005 | +32.04% | +39.58% |
| 2004 | +13.71% | +50.70% |
| 2003 | -11.11% | +33.30% |
| 2002 | -32.10% | -11.72% |
| 2001 | +6.71% | +21.90% |
| 2000 | -9.50% | -5.85% |
| 1999 | +2.63% | +6.90% |
UNM vs BSAC Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for UNM was -81.88%, occurring on Mar 11, 2003. Recovery took 3347 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for BSAC was -63.90%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 1764 trading sessions.
The current BSAC drawdown is -15.66%.
| Rank | UNM | BSAC |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -81.88% Nov 19, 1999 - Mar 14, 2013 | -63.90% Apr 18, 2018 - Apr 24, 2025 |
| #2 | -81.07% Jan 12, 2018 - Jun 29, 2023 | -51.17% Sep 14, 2010 - Sep 22, 2017 |
| #3 | -34.97% Jul 29, 2015 - May 27, 2016 | -48.42% May 1, 2008 - Aug 13, 2009 |
| #4 | -18.77% May 31, 2016 - Oct 12, 2016 | -31.51% Jan 21, 2000 - May 24, 2001 |
| #5 | -17.95% Oct 17, 2023 - Mar 7, 2024 | -30.18% May 25, 2001 - Jul 25, 2003 |
| #6 | -16.84% Mar 24, 2025 - Apr 29, 2026 | -22.67% Jan 31, 2006 - Nov 1, 2006 |
| #7 | -14.79% Sep 2, 2014 - Jun 10, 2015 | -20.45% Oct 26, 2007 - May 1, 2008 |
| #8 | -12.26% Dec 26, 2013 - Mar 4, 2014 | -19.92% May 4, 2007 - Oct 2, 2007 |
| #9 | -11.78% Mar 1, 2017 - Jul 28, 2017 | -19.25% Feb 12, 2004 - Nov 18, 2004 |
| #10 | -11.16% Aug 1, 2013 - Nov 8, 2013 | -18.42% Feb 9, 2026 - Mar 13, 2026 |
| #11 | -10.05% Apr 3, 2024 - Jul 17, 2024 | -15.69% Oct 30, 2017 - Dec 18, 2017 |
| #12 | -9.58% Mar 10, 2014 - Aug 26, 2014 | -14.77% Apr 9, 2010 - Jun 21, 2010 |
| #13 | -8.60% Aug 4, 2017 - Sep 27, 2017 | -14.41% Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 23, 2005 |
| #14 | -8.51% Nov 27, 2024 - Jan 29, 2025 | -14.22% Jan 19, 2010 - Apr 7, 2010 |
| #15 | -8.42% Mar 28, 2013 - May 8, 2013 | -10.45% Nov 16, 2006 - Apr 9, 2007 |
Correlation
Correlation between UNM and BSAC is 0.74 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
UNM vs BSAC dividend yield comparison.
| Year | UNM | BSAC |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.13% | 5.04% |
| 2025 | 2.27% | 4.34% |
| 2024 | 2.15% | 4.10% |
| 2023 | 3.07% | 6.54% |
| 2022 | 3.07% | 7.71% |
| 2021 | 4.76% | 5.70% |
| 2020 | 4.97% | 4.64% |
| 2019 | 3.74% | 4.91% |
| 2018 | 3.34% | 4.97% |
| 2017 | 1.57% | 2.73% |
| 2016 | 1.75% | 3.94% |
| 2015 | 2.10% | 5.12% |
| 2014 | 1.78% | 3.90% |
| 2013 | 1.57% | 3.43% |
| 2012 | 2.26% | 3.12% |
| 2011 | 1.87% | 2.90% |
| 2010 | 1.45% | 2.22% |
| 2009 | 1.61% | 2.46% |
| 2008 | 1.61% | 5.30% |
| 2007 | 1.26% | 3.00% |
| 2006 | 1.44% | 2.71% |
| 2005 | 1.32% | 3.27% |
| 2004 | 1.67% | 4.08% |
| 2003 | 2.36% | 3.90% |
| 2002 | 3.36% | 6.54% |
| 2001 | 2.23% | 4.53% |
| 2000 | 2.19% | 3.47% |
| 1999 | 0.46% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks