UMBF vs WMS
Comparison between UMB Financial Corp (UMBF, Company) and Advanced Drainage Systems Inc (WMS, Company).
UMBF is from the Financial Services sector, while WMS is from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformanceUMBF has outperformed WMS, delivering a return of +12.2% compared to +3.1%
UMBF vs WMS - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
UMBF vs WMS - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
UMBF vs WMS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | UMBF | WMS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +24.34% | -6.97% |
| 2025 | +4.43% | +27.38% |
| 2024 | +36.78% | -15.82% |
| 2023 | +3.42% | +73.91% |
| 2022 | -20.94% | -38.78% |
| 2021 | +56.84% | +69.49% |
| 2020 | +2.31% | +114.18% |
| 2019 | +12.96% | +67.92% |
| 2018 | -14.08% | +2.36% |
| 2017 | -4.73% | +15.31% |
| 2016 | +72.72% | -8.96% |
| 2015 | -15.46% | +5.56% |
| 2014 | -8.37% | +42.54% |
| 2013 | +45.29% | N/A |
| 2012 | +16.28% | N/A |
| 2011 | -10.95% | N/A |
| 2010 | +7.25% | N/A |
| 2009 | -18.23% | N/A |
| 2008 | +33.58% | N/A |
| 2007 | +5.13% | N/A |
| 2006 | +13.65% | N/A |
| 2005 | +15.86% | N/A |
| 2004 | +20.02% | N/A |
| 2003 | +25.51% | N/A |
| 2002 | -4.66% | N/A |
| 2001 | +17.31% | N/A |
| 2000 | +4.09% | N/A |
| 1999 | -9.66% | N/A |
UMBF vs WMS Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for UMBF was -52.70%, occurring on Oct 3, 2011. Recovery took 1303 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for WMS was -53.57%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 115 trading sessions.
The current UMBF drawdown is -2.84%. The current WMS drawdown is -21.66%.
| Rank | UMBF | WMS |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -52.70% Sep 19, 2008 - Nov 21, 2013 | -53.57% Feb 19, 2020 - Aug 3, 2020 |
| #2 | -50.23% Jan 14, 2022 - Sep 19, 2024 | -50.13% Aug 16, 2022 - Feb 8, 2024 |
| #3 | -45.00% Jun 8, 2018 - Jan 7, 2021 | -45.75% May 21, 2024 - Apr 8, 2025 |
| #4 | -37.76% Jan 22, 2014 - Nov 9, 2016 | -44.28% Jun 18, 2015 - Aug 27, 2018 |
| #5 | -31.80% Nov 25, 2024 - Jan 21, 2026 | -39.94% Dec 8, 2021 - Aug 4, 2022 |
| #6 | -29.26% Nov 3, 1999 - Jun 28, 2001 | -29.58% Aug 30, 2018 - Jun 20, 2019 |
| #7 | -27.59% May 15, 2002 - Sep 16, 2003 | -14.85% Feb 24, 2021 - Apr 12, 2021 |
| #8 | -22.52% Sep 19, 2007 - Apr 24, 2008 | -13.76% Jan 7, 2021 - Feb 4, 2021 |
| #9 | -21.27% Mar 1, 2017 - Jun 7, 2018 | -13.50% Aug 3, 2021 - Nov 5, 2021 |
| #10 | -18.57% Feb 6, 2026 - May 6, 2026 | -13.23% Oct 12, 2020 - Dec 2, 2020 |
| #11 | -16.25% Aug 21, 2001 - Apr 1, 2002 | -12.43% Apr 16, 2021 - Jul 12, 2021 |
| #12 | -16.10% Jun 20, 2008 - Jul 22, 2008 | -12.26% Aug 8, 2019 - Oct 9, 2019 |
| #13 | -14.40% May 14, 2021 - Oct 1, 2021 | -10.72% Mar 31, 2015 - May 13, 2015 |
| #14 | -12.75% Aug 11, 2008 - Sep 18, 2008 | -10.43% Nov 12, 2014 - Jan 8, 2015 |
| #15 | -10.65% Dec 9, 2016 - Feb 21, 2017 | -9.96% Oct 23, 2014 - Nov 6, 2014 |
Correlation
Correlation between UMBF and WMS is 0.81 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
UMBF vs WMS dividend yield comparison.
| Year | UMBF | WMS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.60% | 0.27% |
| 2025 | 1.42% | 0.48% |
| 2024 | 1.39% | 0.54% |
| 2023 | 1.83% | 0.38% |
| 2022 | 1.78% | 0.57% |
| 2021 | 1.30% | 0.31% |
| 2020 | 1.81% | 0.43% |
| 2019 | 1.76% | 3.48% |
| 2018 | 1.92% | 1.28% |
| 2017 | 1.45% | 1.13% |
| 2016 | 1.28% | 1.12% |
| 2015 | 2.04% | 0.79% |
| 2014 | 1.60% | 0.17% |
| 2013 | 1.35% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 1.89% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 2.12% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 1.81% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 1.80% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 1.67% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 1.49% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 1.41% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 1.42% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 1.50% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 1.70% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 2.09% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 1.45% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 2.14% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.50% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks