UITB vs AOA

Comparison between VICTORYSHARES CORE INTERMEDIATE BOND ETF FORMERLY VICTORYSHARES USAA CORE INTERMEDIATE-TERM BOND ETF VICTORYSHARES CORE INTERMEDIATE BOND ETF (UITB, ETF) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceAOA has outperformed UITB, delivering a return of +9.0% compared to +0.7%

UITB vs AOA - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	UITB(ETF)	AOA(ETF)
Net Assets	$2.70B	$2.80B
Expense Ratio	0.25%	0.15%
Max Drawdown	20.97%	28.38%
Sharpe Ratio	0.36	2.02
5Y Beta	0.03	0.71
5Y Dividends CAGR	8.73%	15.17%

Net Assets

UITB

$2.70B

Winner

AOA

$2.80B

Expense Ratio

UITB

0.25%

Winner

AOA

0.15%

Max Drawdown

Winner

UITB

20.97%

AOA

28.38%

Sharpe Ratio

UITB

0.36

Winner

AOA

2.02

5Y Beta

Winner

UITB

0.03

AOA

0.71

5Y Dividends CAGR

UITB

8.73%

Winner

AOA

15.17%

UITB vs AOA - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	UITB	AOA
1 month	+0.09%	+5.74%
3 months	+0.02%	+4.21%
6 months	+0.87%	+10.82%
1 year	+5.44%	+27.55%
5 years(CAGR)	+0.69%	+8.97%
10 years(CAGR)	+2.36%	+10.63%
Max(CAGR)	+2.36%	+10.53%

UITB

+0.09%

Winner

AOA

+5.74%

UITB

+0.02%

Winner

AOA

+4.21%

UITB

+0.87%

Winner

AOA

+10.82%

UITB

+5.44%

Winner

AOA

+27.55%

5Y(CAGR)

UITB

+0.69%

Winner

AOA

+8.97%

10Y(CAGR)

UITB

+2.36%

Winner

AOA

+10.63%

Max(CAGR)

UITB

+2.36%

Winner

AOA

+10.53%

UITB vs AOA - Annual Returns (2008 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	UITB	AOA
2026	+0.58%	+7.76%
2025	+7.25%	+19.99%
2024	+2.20%	+14.32%
2023	+6.02%	+18.04%
2022	-11.67%	-16.54%
2021	-0.80%	+15.99%
2020	+7.85%	+11.88%
2019	+11.24%	+22.58%
2018	-1.15%	-8.43%
2017	+0.99%	+19.48%
2016	N/A	+9.03%
2015	N/A	-0.97%
2014	N/A	+7.12%
2013	N/A	+20.51%
2012	N/A	+13.52%
2011	N/A	-2.65%
2010	N/A	+14.90%
2009	N/A	+23.86%
2008	N/A	-2.55%

UITB vs AOA Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for UITB was -17.02%, occurring on Oct 20, 2022. Recovery took 1031 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for AOA was -28.38%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 134 trading sessions.

The current UITB drawdown is -1.27%.

Rank	UITB	AOA
#1	-17.02% Aug 3, 2021 - Sep 11, 2025	-28.38% Feb 12, 2020 - Aug 24, 2020
#2	-8.72% Mar 6, 2020 - Jun 22, 2020	-24.37% Nov 11, 2008 - May 6, 2009
#3	-3.44% Dec 29, 2017 - Jan 30, 2019	-23.62% Jan 4, 2022 - Feb 7, 2024
#4	-3.01% Dec 31, 2020 - Jul 8, 2021	-20.16% Apr 29, 2011 - Mar 13, 2012
#5	-2.56% Feb 27, 2026 - Mar 27, 2026	-16.11% Jan 26, 2018 - Jul 2, 2019
#6	-2.27% Sep 4, 2019 - Jan 3, 2020	-15.03% May 21, 2015 - Aug 11, 2016
#7	-1.26% Aug 6, 2020 - Nov 19, 2020	-13.98% Apr 14, 2010 - Oct 13, 2010
#8	-0.97% Oct 28, 2025 - Nov 25, 2025	-12.94% Feb 18, 2025 - May 15, 2025
#9	-0.85% Nov 26, 2025 - Feb 5, 2026	-9.16% Apr 2, 2012 - Sep 6, 2012
#10	-0.82% Jul 3, 2019 - Aug 1, 2019	-8.35% Jan 14, 2010 - Mar 9, 2010
#11	-0.69% Sep 16, 2025 - Oct 10, 2025	-8.20% Feb 25, 2026 - Apr 17, 2026
#12	-0.58% Jul 8, 2021 - Jul 19, 2021	-7.36% Sep 5, 2014 - Nov 24, 2014
#13	-0.56% Nov 6, 2017 - Nov 24, 2017	-6.88% Jun 2, 2009 - Jul 20, 2009
#14	-0.49% Jan 31, 2020 - Feb 18, 2020	-6.58% May 21, 2013 - Jul 22, 2013
#15	-0.47% Feb 26, 2019 - Mar 7, 2019	-6.25% Sep 2, 2020 - Nov 9, 2020

Correlation

Correlation between UITB and AOA is 0.70 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.70

-101

Dividend Comparison (2008 - 2026)

UITB vs AOA dividend yield comparison.

Year	UITB	AOA
2026	1.48%	0.29%
2025	4.04%	2.18%
2024	3.89%	2.30%
2023	3.14%	2.22%
2022	2.32%	2.10%
2021	1.95%	1.67%
2020	2.79%	1.71%
2019	3.01%	2.50%
2018	2.99%	2.37%
2017	0.50%	5.09%
2016	0.00%	2.26%
2015	0.00%	2.15%
2014	0.00%	2.18%
2013	0.00%	1.84%
2012	0.00%	2.18%
2011	0.00%	2.21%
2010	0.00%	1.63%
2009	0.00%	2.04%
2008	0.00%	0.71%