TU vs CX
Comparison between Telus Corp (TU, Company) and Cemex S.A.B. De C.V. (CX, Company).
TU is from the Communication Services sector, while CX is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceCX has outperformed TU, delivering a return of +7.5% compared to -7.1%
TU vs CX - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
TU vs CX - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
TU vs CX - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | TU | CX |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -10.09% | +4.37% |
| 2025 | +4.57% | +104.18% |
| 2024 | -18.87% | -25.13% |
| 2023 | -2.16% | +88.11% |
| 2022 | -14.39% | -39.37% |
| 2021 | +23.83% | +31.40% |
| 2020 | +7.03% | +34.64% |
| 2019 | +21.95% | -22.00% |
| 2018 | -8.14% | -37.73% |
| 2017 | +24.89% | -1.27% |
| 2016 | +23.85% | +59.68% |
| 2015 | -18.53% | -41.25% |
| 2014 | +9.58% | -4.16% |
| 2013 | +9.43% | +23.75% |
| 2012 | +26.46% | +90.63% |
| 2011 | +28.10% | -46.86% |
| 2010 | +44.95% | -5.97% |
| 2009 | +16.56% | +27.97% |
| 2008 | -38.58% | -63.68% |
| 2007 | +13.05% | -22.35% |
| 2006 | +11.84% | +11.45% |
| 2005 | +45.43% | +69.01% |
| 2004 | +54.21% | +42.92% |
| 2003 | +85.03% | +23.50% |
| 2002 | -21.96% | -12.01% |
| 2001 | -38.82% | +42.94% |
| 2000 | +15.51% | -34.04% |
| 1999 | +21.85% | +21.85% |
TU vs CX Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for TU was -88.30%, occurring on Jul 26, 2002. Recovery took 1085 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CX was -92.41%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current TU drawdown is -45.25%. The current CX drawdown is -42.59%.
| Rank | TU | CX |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -88.30% Aug 22, 2000 - Dec 17, 2004 | -92.41% Jun 15, 2007 - Mar 23, 2020 |
| #2 | -59.59% Jun 4, 2007 - Apr 21, 2011 | -48.40% May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2004 |
| #3 | -45.25% Apr 8, 2022 - Jun 24, 2026 | -36.55% Dec 30, 1999 - May 23, 2001 |
| #4 | -33.66% Feb 12, 2020 - Dec 9, 2020 | -33.50% May 8, 2006 - Jan 24, 2007 |
| #5 | -31.02% Nov 18, 2014 - May 22, 2017 | -28.80% Jul 27, 2001 - Mar 8, 2002 |
| #6 | -22.54% May 10, 2013 - Mar 27, 2014 | -18.76% Mar 7, 2005 - Jun 14, 2005 |
| #7 | -22.08% Oct 31, 2006 - Apr 20, 2007 | -14.77% Feb 21, 2007 - May 30, 2007 |
| #8 | -19.49% Apr 3, 2000 - Jul 18, 2000 | -14.60% Feb 1, 2006 - Apr 4, 2006 |
| #9 | -16.19% Jul 31, 2000 - Aug 22, 2000 | -12.32% Apr 23, 2004 - Jun 7, 2004 |
| #10 | -16.09% Jul 15, 2011 - Jan 3, 2012 | -12.12% Sep 21, 2004 - Nov 17, 2004 |
| #11 | -11.80% Jun 16, 2014 - Nov 17, 2014 | -10.56% Sep 6, 2005 - Nov 2, 2005 |
| #12 | -11.31% Sep 13, 2018 - Mar 26, 2019 | -9.47% May 23, 2001 - Jul 2, 2001 |
| #13 | -11.31% Jan 3, 2006 - Mar 16, 2006 | -9.39% Jun 21, 2004 - Sep 14, 2004 |
| #14 | -10.87% May 2, 2006 - Aug 1, 2006 | -9.29% Nov 11, 1999 - Dec 3, 1999 |
| #15 | -10.74% Sep 23, 2005 - Jan 3, 2006 | -7.94% Aug 11, 2005 - Sep 1, 2005 |
Correlation
Correlation between TU and CX is -0.11 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
TU vs CX dividend yield comparison.
| Year | TU | CX |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 5.47% | 0.45% |
| 2025 | 9.01% | 0.77% |
| 2024 | 8.35% | 1.10% |
| 2023 | 6.02% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 5.39% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 4.31% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 4.51% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 4.37% | 2.63% |
| 2018 | 5.19% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 5.20% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 5.78% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 6.08% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 4.22% | 4.87% |
| 2013 | 3.95% | 3.77% |
| 2012 | 3.75% | 3.17% |
| 2011 | 4.12% | 6.54% |
| 2010 | 4.59% | 4.06% |
| 2009 | 6.10% | 3.30% |
| 2008 | 6.42% | 9.14% |
| 2007 | 3.93% | 2.88% |
| 2006 | 3.23% | 1.96% |
| 2005 | 2.48% | 2.02% |
| 2004 | 2.63% | 2.80% |
| 2003 | 3.76% | 3.98% |
| 2002 | 6.70% | 4.76% |
| 2001 | 9.90% | 3.64% |
| 2000 | 4.54% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 1.01% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks