CX vs BIP
Comparison between Cemex S.A.B. De C.V. (CX, Company) and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP, Company).
CX is from the Basic Materials sector, while BIP is from the Utilities sector.
5-Year PerformanceCX has outperformed BIP, delivering a return of +9.8% compared to +5.9%
CX vs BIP - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CX vs BIP - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CX vs BIP - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CX | BIP |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +12.29% | +14.22% |
| 2025 | +104.18% | +14.84% |
| 2024 | -25.13% | +7.69% |
| 2023 | +88.11% | +5.55% |
| 2022 | -39.37% | -21.10% |
| 2021 | +31.40% | +27.52% |
| 2020 | +34.64% | +15.36% |
| 2019 | -22.00% | +49.52% |
| 2018 | -37.73% | -18.87% |
| 2017 | -1.27% | +39.81% |
| 2016 | +59.68% | +42.16% |
| 2015 | -41.25% | -6.16% |
| 2014 | -4.16% | +13.17% |
| 2013 | +23.75% | +14.55% |
| 2012 | +90.63% | +31.91% |
| 2011 | -46.86% | +38.55% |
| 2010 | -5.97% | +34.03% |
| 2009 | +27.97% | +39.88% |
| 2008 | -63.68% | -37.64% |
| 2007 | -22.35% | N/A |
| 2006 | +11.45% | N/A |
| 2005 | +69.01% | N/A |
| 2004 | +42.92% | N/A |
| 2003 | +23.50% | N/A |
| 2002 | -12.01% | N/A |
| 2001 | +42.94% | N/A |
| 2000 | -34.04% | N/A |
| 1999 | +21.85% | N/A |
CX vs BIP Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CX was -92.41%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for BIP was -56.05%, occurring on Mar 4, 2009. Recovery took 541 trading sessions.
The current CX drawdown is -38.22%. The current BIP drawdown is -2.58%.
| Rank | CX | BIP |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -92.41% Jun 15, 2007 - Mar 23, 2020 | -56.05% Jan 28, 2008 - Mar 22, 2010 |
| #2 | -48.40% May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2004 | -51.31% Feb 20, 2020 - Nov 9, 2020 |
| #3 | -36.55% Dec 30, 1999 - May 23, 2001 | -49.84% Apr 20, 2022 - Feb 6, 2026 |
| #4 | -33.50% May 8, 2006 - Jan 24, 2007 | -28.40% Apr 6, 2015 - Jun 6, 2016 |
| #5 | -28.80% Jul 27, 2001 - Mar 8, 2002 | -25.40% Dec 27, 2017 - Jun 7, 2019 |
| #6 | -18.76% Mar 7, 2005 - Jun 14, 2005 | -17.02% Mar 22, 2010 - Sep 9, 2010 |
| #7 | -14.77% Feb 21, 2007 - May 30, 2007 | -16.61% Sep 20, 2011 - Dec 27, 2011 |
| #8 | -14.60% Feb 1, 2006 - Apr 4, 2006 | -14.38% Mar 4, 2013 - Oct 28, 2013 |
| #9 | -12.32% Apr 23, 2004 - Jun 7, 2004 | -12.60% Aug 29, 2014 - Dec 2, 2014 |
| #10 | -12.12% Sep 21, 2004 - Nov 17, 2004 | -12.48% Nov 18, 2013 - May 7, 2014 |
| #11 | -10.56% Sep 6, 2005 - Nov 2, 2005 | -12.25% Mar 2, 2026 - May 21, 2026 |
| #12 | -9.47% May 23, 2001 - Jul 2, 2001 | -10.86% Nov 8, 2010 - Feb 14, 2011 |
| #13 | -9.39% Jun 21, 2004 - Sep 14, 2004 | -10.64% Aug 3, 2011 - Aug 15, 2011 |
| #14 | -9.29% Nov 11, 1999 - Dec 3, 1999 | -10.05% Sep 30, 2016 - Jan 5, 2017 |
| #15 | -7.94% Aug 11, 2005 - Sep 1, 2005 | -9.25% Aug 22, 2012 - Jan 3, 2013 |
Correlation
Correlation between CX and BIP is -0.02 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (2001 - 2026)
CX vs BIP dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CX | BIP |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.17% | 2.38% |
| 2025 | 0.77% | 4.95% |
| 2024 | 1.10% | 5.10% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 4.86% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 4.65% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 3.35% |
| 2020 | 0.00% | 3.92% |
| 2019 | 2.63% | 4.02% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 5.45% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 3.88% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 4.62% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 5.59% |
| 2014 | 4.87% | 4.59% |
| 2013 | 3.77% | 4.38% |
| 2012 | 3.17% | 4.26% |
| 2011 | 6.54% | 4.77% |
| 2010 | 4.06% | 5.22% |
| 2009 | 3.30% | 6.32% |
| 2008 | 9.14% | 7.89% |
| 2007 | 2.88% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 1.96% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 2.02% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 2.80% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 3.98% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 4.76% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 3.64% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks