TRI vs HUM
Comparison between Thomson-Reuters Corp (TRI, Company) and Humana Inc (HUM, Company).
TRI is from the Industrials sector, while HUM is from the Healthcare sector.
5-Year PerformanceTRI has outperformed HUM, delivering a return of -0.5% compared to -6.5%
TRI vs HUM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
TRI vs HUM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
TRI vs HUM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | TRI | HUM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -31.28% | +15.37% |
| 2025 | -17.06% | +2.79% |
| 2024 | +12.82% | -45.42% |
| 2023 | +28.64% | -7.84% |
| 2022 | -0.97% | +10.77% |
| 2021 | +51.02% | +13.27% |
| 2020 | +15.80% | +13.71% |
| 2019 | +53.97% | +31.18% |
| 2018 | +14.09% | +14.62% |
| 2017 | +2.50% | +26.58% |
| 2016 | +22.07% | +14.05% |
| 2015 | -2.07% | +25.64% |
| 2014 | +13.45% | +40.88% |
| 2013 | +33.37% | +52.73% |
| 2012 | +12.37% | -21.24% |
| 2011 | -27.57% | +60.46% |
| 2010 | +17.92% | +19.83% |
| 2009 | +16.31% | +17.76% |
| 2008 | -26.04% | -52.28% |
| 2007 | -0.57% | +34.43% |
| 2006 | +22.33% | -0.84% |
| 2005 | +0.75% | +86.32% |
| 2004 | -2.37% | +29.48% |
| 2003 | +37.12% | +121.63% |
| 2002 | -12.38% | -13.04% |
| 2001 | N/A | -21.08% |
| 2000 | N/A | +101.64% |
| 1999 | N/A | +10.08% |
TRI vs HUM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for TRI was -62.55%, occurring on May 14, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for HUM was -78.42%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 961 trading sessions.
The current TRI drawdown is -59.15%. The current HUM drawdown is -43.92%.
| Rank | TRI | HUM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -62.55% Jul 14, 2025 - May 14, 2026 | -78.42% Jan 14, 2008 - Nov 3, 2011 |
| #2 | -56.41% Oct 31, 2007 - Nov 6, 2013 | -69.92% Nov 3, 2022 - Mar 12, 2026 |
| #3 | -35.36% Feb 19, 2020 - Oct 5, 2020 | -49.21% Jun 19, 2002 - Jul 28, 2003 |
| #4 | -26.73% Jun 28, 2002 - May 20, 2003 | -48.65% Jan 13, 2000 - Sep 15, 2000 |
| #5 | -24.61% Nov 19, 2021 - Feb 13, 2023 | -44.21% Dec 28, 2000 - Apr 18, 2002 |
| #6 | -20.38% Oct 17, 2017 - Oct 3, 2018 | -43.60% Feb 13, 2020 - Apr 30, 2020 |
| #7 | -18.30% Jan 2, 2004 - Nov 16, 2004 | -35.10% Jan 17, 2012 - Aug 8, 2013 |
| #8 | -17.36% Oct 22, 2015 - Apr 26, 2016 | -34.96% Jan 26, 2004 - Nov 24, 2004 |
| #9 | -14.34% Jun 27, 2023 - Nov 17, 2023 | -33.95% Nov 7, 2018 - Dec 13, 2019 |
| #10 | -13.21% Feb 17, 2005 - Aug 10, 2005 | -28.07% Jun 1, 2015 - Dec 1, 2016 |
| #11 | -11.96% May 24, 2024 - Feb 6, 2025 | -27.60% Jan 5, 2006 - Aug 2, 2006 |
| #12 | -11.63% Nov 14, 2013 - Jul 9, 2014 | -24.08% Oct 4, 2006 - Jul 18, 2007 |
| #13 | -11.24% Sep 19, 2005 - Feb 15, 2006 | -22.68% Jul 23, 2021 - Jun 29, 2022 |
| #14 | -11.20% Apr 15, 2015 - Oct 12, 2015 | -20.60% Nov 17, 2000 - Dec 26, 2000 |
| #15 | -10.65% Jul 17, 2007 - Oct 5, 2007 | -18.18% Nov 22, 1999 - Jan 7, 2000 |
Correlation
Correlation between TRI and HUM is 0.76 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2002 - 2026)
TRI vs HUM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | TRI | HUM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.22% | 0.29% |
| 2025 | 1.80% | 1.38% |
| 2024 | 1.35% | 1.40% |
| 2023 | 4.68% | 0.77% |
| 2022 | 1.56% | 0.62% |
| 2021 | 1.76% | 0.60% |
| 2020 | 1.86% | 0.61% |
| 2019 | 2.01% | 0.60% |
| 2018 | 2.87% | 0.70% |
| 2017 | 3.17% | 0.76% |
| 2016 | 3.11% | 0.43% |
| 2015 | 3.54% | 0.64% |
| 2014 | 4.51% | 0.77% |
| 2013 | 3.44% | 1.04% |
| 2012 | 4.41% | 1.50% |
| 2011 | 4.65% | 0.86% |
| 2010 | 3.11% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 3.47% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 2.77% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 1.80% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 2.12% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 2.28% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 2.14% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 3.18% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 1.33% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks