TM vs CCZ
Comparison between Toyota Motor Corporation (TM, Company) and Comcast Corp (CCZ, Company).
5-Year PerformanceCCZ has outperformed TM, delivering a return of +4.0% compared to +2.6%
TM vs CCZ - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
TM vs CCZ - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
TM vs CCZ - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | TM | CCZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -17.23% | +10.69% |
| 2025 | +14.71% | +1.18% |
| 2024 | +10.10% | +10.59% |
| 2023 | +36.47% | +3.78% |
| 2022 | -24.81% | -8.28% |
| 2021 | +24.20% | +7.62% |
| 2020 | +12.26% | +8.24% |
| 2019 | +22.49% | +19.46% |
| 2018 | -6.75% | -11.89% |
| 2017 | +10.83% | +43.63% |
| 2016 | -0.23% | +9.71% |
| 2015 | +3.20% | -13.76% |
| 2014 | +7.00% | +33.47% |
| 2013 | +29.82% | -0.20% |
| 2012 | +40.05% | +21.07% |
| 2011 | -15.35% | +21.60% |
| 2010 | -6.33% | +8.65% |
| 2009 | +28.90% | +13.74% |
| 2008 | -36.78% | -5.02% |
| 2007 | -20.02% | +9.27% |
| 2006 | +28.83% | +7.57% |
| 2005 | +30.52% | -6.32% |
| 2004 | +20.14% | +34.63% |
| 2003 | +29.25% | +50.55% |
| 2002 | +4.74% | -50.75% |
| 2001 | -18.72% | +24.93% |
| 2000 | -34.77% | -54.94% |
| 1999 | +42.68% | +12.22% |
TM vs CCZ Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for TM was -60.16%, occurring on Apr 14, 2003. Recovery took 1423 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CCZ was -86.36%, occurring on Aug 6, 2002. Recovery took 3633 trading sessions.
The current TM drawdown is -27.37%. The current CCZ drawdown is -1.50%.
| Rank | TM | CCZ |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -60.16% Apr 25, 2000 - Dec 21, 2005 | -86.36% Mar 31, 2000 - Sep 11, 2014 |
| #2 | -56.11% Jan 4, 2007 - May 13, 2013 | -24.77% Jan 27, 2021 - Nov 13, 2025 |
| #3 | -36.79% Jan 13, 2022 - Jan 19, 2024 | -23.96% Sep 14, 2016 - Mar 31, 2017 |
| #4 | -34.92% Mar 27, 2024 - Feb 4, 2026 | -23.63% Dec 29, 2017 - Dec 20, 2019 |
| #5 | -32.94% Feb 13, 2026 - Jun 25, 2026 | -20.28% Sep 18, 2014 - Mar 29, 2016 |
| #6 | -27.92% Mar 30, 2015 - Jan 3, 2018 | -19.56% Dec 15, 1999 - Mar 7, 2000 |
| #7 | -25.20% Nov 11, 2019 - Nov 11, 2020 | -18.51% Apr 5, 2016 - Sep 13, 2016 |
| #8 | -22.65% May 5, 2006 - Nov 8, 2006 | -17.92% Mar 11, 2020 - Jul 23, 2020 |
| #9 | -20.90% Aug 2, 2013 - Jan 22, 2015 | -16.51% Mar 31, 2017 - Aug 29, 2017 |
| #10 | -18.07% May 10, 2018 - Sep 13, 2019 | -15.15% Sep 8, 2017 - Dec 22, 2017 |
| #11 | -17.21% Dec 31, 1999 - Mar 27, 2000 | -15.13% Dec 20, 2019 - Mar 11, 2020 |
| #12 | -11.75% May 21, 2013 - Jul 17, 2013 | -12.07% Dec 16, 2020 - Jan 26, 2021 |
| #13 | -11.53% Jan 17, 2018 - May 10, 2018 | -7.89% Mar 13, 2000 - Mar 22, 2000 |
| #14 | -11.45% Aug 3, 2021 - Sep 27, 2021 | -7.69% Nov 9, 2020 - Dec 9, 2020 |
| #15 | -9.96% Sep 29, 2021 - Nov 16, 2021 | -7.66% Aug 10, 2020 - Oct 14, 2020 |
Correlation
Correlation between TM and CCZ is 0.91 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
TM vs CCZ dividend yield comparison.
| Year | TM | CCZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 1.41% |
| 2025 | 2.95% | 3.01% |
| 2024 | 2.81% | 3.44% |
| 2023 | 2.45% | 1.99% |
| 2022 | 2.90% | 3.39% |
| 2021 | 2.45% | 2.36% |
| 2020 | 2.74% | 3.02% |
| 2019 | 1.30% | 1.27% |
| 2018 | 3.40% | 2.31% |
| 2017 | 2.96% | 2.50% |
| 2016 | 3.23% | 3.48% |
| 2015 | 5.59% | 3.70% |
| 2014 | 2.57% | 3.09% |
| 2013 | 2.08% | 6.66% |
| 2012 | 1.59% | 7.92% |
| 2011 | 1.90% | 9.62% |
| 2010 | 1.31% | 6.66% |
| 2009 | 1.41% | 8.61% |
| 2008 | 4.19% | 7.77% |
| 2007 | 2.19% | 11.17% |
| 2006 | 1.99% | 8.52% |
| 2005 | 1.17% | 4.33% |
| 2004 | 1.07% | 3.52% |
| 2003 | 0.91% | 4.15% |
| 2002 | 1.21% | 5.94% |
| 2001 | 0.72% | 2.74% |
| 2000 | 0.93% | 1.66% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks