SVM vs CWT
Comparison between Silvercorp Metals Inc (SVM, Company) and California Water Service Group (CWT, Company).
SVM is from the Basic Materials sector, while CWT is from the Utilities sector.
5-Year PerformanceSVM has outperformed CWT, delivering a return of +11.9% compared to -2.1%
SVM vs CWT - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
SVM vs CWT - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
SVM vs CWT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | SVM | CWT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +27.73% | +8.38% |
| 2025 | +165.98% | -0.56% |
| 2024 | +19.45% | -10.67% |
| 2023 | -12.09% | -14.49% |
| 2022 | -18.65% | -14.14% |
| 2021 | -46.63% | +36.49% |
| 2020 | +20.03% | +8.60% |
| 2019 | +158.62% | +13.02% |
| 2018 | -26.02% | +8.62% |
| 2017 | +5.56% | +36.99% |
| 2016 | +386.68% | +50.02% |
| 2015 | -64.88% | -2.76% |
| 2014 | -45.63% | +13.13% |
| 2013 | -54.74% | +27.66% |
| 2012 | -23.50% | +4.24% |
| 2011 | -50.40% | +0.31% |
| 2010 | +87.19% | +4.11% |
| 2009 | +225.77% | -17.22% |
| 2008 | -77.75% | +30.29% |
| 2007 | -34.21% | -3.71% |
| 2006 | +202.47% | +8.87% |
| 2005 | +254.76% | +7.39% |
| 2004 | N/A | +41.17% |
| 2003 | N/A | +18.55% |
| 2002 | N/A | -1.59% |
| 2001 | N/A | +4.86% |
| 2000 | N/A | +0.59% |
| 1999 | N/A | +1.03% |
SVM vs CWT Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for SVM was -98.00%, occurring on Jan 21, 2016. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for CWT was -38.22%, occurring on Jan 10, 2025. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current SVM drawdown is -46.19%. The current CWT drawdown is -29.45%.
| Rank | SVM | CWT |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -98.00% Oct 26, 2007 - Jan 21, 2016 | -38.22% Jan 3, 2022 - Jan 10, 2025 |
| #2 | -45.62% Apr 19, 2006 - Feb 23, 2007 | -31.27% Dec 27, 1999 - Apr 22, 2003 |
| #3 | -31.89% Jul 19, 2007 - Oct 5, 2007 | -30.88% Oct 31, 2007 - Dec 17, 2008 |
| #4 | -21.47% Aug 11, 2005 - Dec 6, 2005 | -26.71% Dec 31, 2008 - Feb 19, 2013 |
| #5 | -20.37% Feb 23, 2007 - Jul 9, 2007 | -25.99% Feb 18, 2020 - Jan 6, 2021 |
| #6 | -19.63% Jun 6, 2005 - Jul 6, 2005 | -25.15% Apr 21, 2006 - Jan 10, 2007 |
| #7 | -15.31% Mar 3, 2006 - Mar 20, 2006 | -22.54% Jan 29, 2015 - Feb 12, 2016 |
| #8 | -11.57% Jul 8, 2005 - Jul 29, 2005 | -21.98% Nov 30, 2017 - Nov 16, 2018 |
| #9 | -10.10% Jan 9, 2006 - Jan 23, 2006 | -21.54% Aug 3, 2005 - Jan 27, 2006 |
| #10 | -9.23% May 3, 2005 - May 24, 2005 | -21.46% Jan 10, 2007 - Aug 8, 2007 |
| #11 | -8.79% Apr 6, 2006 - Apr 17, 2006 | -18.56% Aug 9, 2007 - Oct 29, 2007 |
| #12 | -7.28% Feb 6, 2006 - Feb 16, 2006 | -17.83% Jun 18, 2003 - Apr 27, 2004 |
| #13 | -4.95% Dec 16, 2005 - Dec 23, 2005 | -14.80% Dec 30, 2004 - Jun 1, 2005 |
| #14 | -4.80% Oct 18, 2007 - Oct 24, 2007 | -14.76% Jul 5, 2016 - Nov 22, 2016 |
| #15 | -4.35% Oct 12, 2007 - Oct 18, 2007 | -14.67% Mar 25, 2014 - Jun 27, 2014 |
Correlation
Correlation between SVM and CWT is -0.23 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
SVM vs CWT dividend yield comparison.
| Year | SVM | CWT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.12% | 1.46% |
| 2025 | 0.30% | 2.86% |
| 2024 | 0.83% | 2.47% |
| 2023 | 0.95% | 2.01% |
| 2022 | 0.84% | 1.65% |
| 2021 | 0.66% | 1.28% |
| 2020 | 0.37% | 1.57% |
| 2019 | 0.44% | 1.53% |
| 2018 | 1.19% | 1.57% |
| 2017 | 0.76% | 1.59% |
| 2016 | 0.43% | 2.04% |
| 2015 | 2.13% | 2.88% |
| 2014 | 1.54% | 2.64% |
| 2013 | 4.37% | 2.77% |
| 2012 | 1.95% | 3.43% |
| 2011 | 1.33% | 3.37% |
| 2010 | 0.62% | 3.19% |
| 2009 | 1.21% | 3.20% |
| 2008 | 1.88% | 2.52% |
| 2007 | 1.58% | 3.13% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 3.57% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 2.98% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 3.00% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 4.11% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 4.74% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 5.42% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 4.13% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks