CWT vs ASH
Comparison between California Water Service Group (CWT, Company) and Ashland Inc (ASH, Company).
CWT is from the Utilities sector, while ASH is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceCWT has outperformed ASH, delivering a return of -2.1% compared to -8.1%
CWT vs ASH - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CWT vs ASH - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CWT vs ASH - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CWT | ASH |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +8.38% | -4.84% |
| 2025 | -0.56% | -13.36% |
| 2024 | -10.67% | -13.09% |
| 2023 | -14.49% | -20.90% |
| 2022 | -14.14% | +2.72% |
| 2021 | +36.49% | +37.84% |
| 2020 | +8.60% | +4.76% |
| 2019 | +13.02% | +8.55% |
| 2018 | +8.62% | -1.76% |
| 2017 | +36.99% | +31.46% |
| 2016 | +50.02% | +8.53% |
| 2015 | -2.76% | -12.65% |
| 2014 | +13.13% | +25.15% |
| 2013 | +27.66% | +16.47% |
| 2012 | +4.24% | +40.65% |
| 2011 | +0.31% | +9.54% |
| 2010 | +4.11% | +24.85% |
| 2009 | -17.22% | +266.09% |
| 2008 | +30.29% | -77.02% |
| 2007 | -3.71% | -29.21% |
| 2006 | +8.87% | +38.01% |
| 2005 | +7.39% | +2.41% |
| 2004 | +41.17% | +35.85% |
| 2003 | +18.55% | +57.67% |
| 2002 | -1.59% | -35.05% |
| 2001 | +4.86% | +32.55% |
| 2000 | +0.59% | +15.89% |
| 1999 | +1.03% | -0.35% |
CWT vs ASH Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CWT was -38.22%, occurring on Jan 10, 2025. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for ASH was -91.63%, occurring on Mar 3, 2009. Recovery took 1113 trading sessions.
The current CWT drawdown is -29.45%. The current ASH drawdown is -46.52%.
| Rank | CWT | ASH |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -38.22% Jan 3, 2022 - Jan 10, 2025 | -91.63% Dec 27, 2006 - May 31, 2011 |
| #2 | -31.27% Dec 27, 1999 - Apr 22, 2003 | -57.30% Dec 2, 2022 - Apr 8, 2025 |
| #3 | -30.88% Oct 31, 2007 - Dec 17, 2008 | -52.83% Sep 20, 2018 - Jan 6, 2021 |
| #4 | -26.71% Dec 31, 2008 - Feb 19, 2013 | -48.00% Feb 1, 2002 - Dec 29, 2003 |
| #5 | -25.99% Feb 18, 2020 - Jan 6, 2021 | -37.18% May 31, 2011 - Jun 19, 2012 |
| #6 | -25.15% Apr 21, 2006 - Jan 10, 2007 | -31.46% May 11, 2015 - May 19, 2017 |
| #7 | -22.54% Jan 29, 2015 - Feb 12, 2016 | -28.39% Jun 30, 2005 - Mar 31, 2006 |
| #8 | -21.98% Nov 30, 2017 - Nov 16, 2018 | -22.29% Apr 19, 2006 - Nov 8, 2006 |
| #9 | -21.54% Aug 3, 2005 - Jan 27, 2006 | -21.67% Nov 19, 2021 - Apr 20, 2022 |
| #10 | -21.46% Jan 10, 2007 - Aug 8, 2007 | -17.55% Nov 18, 1999 - May 11, 2000 |
| #11 | -18.56% Aug 9, 2007 - Oct 29, 2007 | -17.28% Sep 4, 2001 - Dec 4, 2001 |
| #12 | -17.83% Jun 18, 2003 - Apr 27, 2004 | -15.52% Jan 10, 2013 - Apr 12, 2013 |
| #13 | -14.80% Dec 30, 2004 - Jun 1, 2005 | -14.91% Sep 11, 2000 - Jan 25, 2001 |
| #14 | -14.76% Jul 5, 2016 - Nov 22, 2016 | -14.88% Jun 7, 2022 - Nov 15, 2022 |
| #15 | -14.67% Mar 25, 2014 - Jun 27, 2014 | -14.70% May 18, 2001 - Sep 4, 2001 |
Correlation
Correlation between CWT and ASH is 0.95 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
CWT vs ASH dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CWT | ASH |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.46% | 1.49% |
| 2025 | 2.86% | 2.81% |
| 2024 | 2.47% | 2.24% |
| 2023 | 2.01% | 1.77% |
| 2022 | 1.65% | 1.21% |
| 2021 | 1.28% | 1.09% |
| 2020 | 1.57% | 1.39% |
| 2019 | 1.53% | 1.40% |
| 2018 | 1.57% | 1.37% |
| 2017 | 1.59% | 88.83% |
| 2016 | 2.04% | 1.43% |
| 2015 | 2.88% | 1.47% |
| 2014 | 2.64% | 1.14% |
| 2013 | 2.77% | 1.28% |
| 2012 | 3.43% | 1.06% |
| 2011 | 3.37% | 1.18% |
| 2010 | 3.19% | 1.03% |
| 2009 | 3.20% | 0.76% |
| 2008 | 2.52% | 8.56% |
| 2007 | 3.13% | 2.32% |
| 2006 | 3.57% | 16.33% |
| 2005 | 2.98% | 1.90% |
| 2004 | 3.00% | 1.88% |
| 2003 | 4.11% | 2.50% |
| 2002 | 4.74% | 3.86% |
| 2001 | 5.42% | 2.39% |
| 2000 | 4.13% | 3.06% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.83% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks