CWT vs SVM
Comparison between California Water Service Group (CWT, Company) and Silvercorp Metals Inc (SVM, Company).
CWT is from the Utilities sector, while SVM is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceSVM has outperformed CWT, delivering a return of +11.9% compared to -2.1%
CWT vs SVM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CWT vs SVM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CWT vs SVM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CWT | SVM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +8.38% | +27.73% |
| 2025 | -0.56% | +165.98% |
| 2024 | -10.67% | +19.45% |
| 2023 | -14.49% | -12.09% |
| 2022 | -14.14% | -18.65% |
| 2021 | +36.49% | -46.63% |
| 2020 | +8.60% | +20.03% |
| 2019 | +13.02% | +158.62% |
| 2018 | +8.62% | -26.02% |
| 2017 | +36.99% | +5.56% |
| 2016 | +50.02% | +386.68% |
| 2015 | -2.76% | -64.88% |
| 2014 | +13.13% | -45.63% |
| 2013 | +27.66% | -54.74% |
| 2012 | +4.24% | -23.50% |
| 2011 | +0.31% | -50.40% |
| 2010 | +4.11% | +87.19% |
| 2009 | -17.22% | +225.77% |
| 2008 | +30.29% | -77.75% |
| 2007 | -3.71% | -34.21% |
| 2006 | +8.87% | +202.47% |
| 2005 | +7.39% | +254.76% |
| 2004 | +41.17% | N/A |
| 2003 | +18.55% | N/A |
| 2002 | -1.59% | N/A |
| 2001 | +4.86% | N/A |
| 2000 | +0.59% | N/A |
| 1999 | +1.03% | N/A |
CWT vs SVM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CWT was -38.22%, occurring on Jan 10, 2025. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for SVM was -98.00%, occurring on Jan 21, 2016. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current CWT drawdown is -29.45%. The current SVM drawdown is -46.19%.
| Rank | CWT | SVM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -38.22% Jan 3, 2022 - Jan 10, 2025 | -98.00% Oct 26, 2007 - Jan 21, 2016 |
| #2 | -31.27% Dec 27, 1999 - Apr 22, 2003 | -45.62% Apr 19, 2006 - Feb 23, 2007 |
| #3 | -30.88% Oct 31, 2007 - Dec 17, 2008 | -31.89% Jul 19, 2007 - Oct 5, 2007 |
| #4 | -26.71% Dec 31, 2008 - Feb 19, 2013 | -21.47% Aug 11, 2005 - Dec 6, 2005 |
| #5 | -25.99% Feb 18, 2020 - Jan 6, 2021 | -20.37% Feb 23, 2007 - Jul 9, 2007 |
| #6 | -25.15% Apr 21, 2006 - Jan 10, 2007 | -19.63% Jun 6, 2005 - Jul 6, 2005 |
| #7 | -22.54% Jan 29, 2015 - Feb 12, 2016 | -15.31% Mar 3, 2006 - Mar 20, 2006 |
| #8 | -21.98% Nov 30, 2017 - Nov 16, 2018 | -11.57% Jul 8, 2005 - Jul 29, 2005 |
| #9 | -21.54% Aug 3, 2005 - Jan 27, 2006 | -10.10% Jan 9, 2006 - Jan 23, 2006 |
| #10 | -21.46% Jan 10, 2007 - Aug 8, 2007 | -9.23% May 3, 2005 - May 24, 2005 |
| #11 | -18.56% Aug 9, 2007 - Oct 29, 2007 | -8.79% Apr 6, 2006 - Apr 17, 2006 |
| #12 | -17.83% Jun 18, 2003 - Apr 27, 2004 | -7.28% Feb 6, 2006 - Feb 16, 2006 |
| #13 | -14.80% Dec 30, 2004 - Jun 1, 2005 | -4.95% Dec 16, 2005 - Dec 23, 2005 |
| #14 | -14.76% Jul 5, 2016 - Nov 22, 2016 | -4.80% Oct 18, 2007 - Oct 24, 2007 |
| #15 | -14.67% Mar 25, 2014 - Jun 27, 2014 | -4.35% Oct 12, 2007 - Oct 18, 2007 |
Correlation
Correlation between CWT and SVM is -0.23 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
CWT vs SVM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CWT | SVM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.46% | 0.12% |
| 2025 | 2.86% | 0.30% |
| 2024 | 2.47% | 0.83% |
| 2023 | 2.01% | 0.95% |
| 2022 | 1.65% | 0.84% |
| 2021 | 1.28% | 0.66% |
| 2020 | 1.57% | 0.37% |
| 2019 | 1.53% | 0.44% |
| 2018 | 1.57% | 1.19% |
| 2017 | 1.59% | 0.76% |
| 2016 | 2.04% | 0.43% |
| 2015 | 2.88% | 2.13% |
| 2014 | 2.64% | 1.54% |
| 2013 | 2.77% | 4.37% |
| 2012 | 3.43% | 1.95% |
| 2011 | 3.37% | 1.33% |
| 2010 | 3.19% | 0.62% |
| 2009 | 3.20% | 1.21% |
| 2008 | 2.52% | 1.88% |
| 2007 | 3.13% | 1.58% |
| 2006 | 3.57% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 2.98% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 3.00% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 4.11% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 4.74% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 5.42% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 4.13% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks