StockComparison Logo
vs

SQM vs HUBB

Comparison between Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM, Company) and Hubbell Inc (HUBB, Company).

SQM is from the Basic Materials sector, while HUBB is from the Industrials sector.

5-Year PerformanceHUBB has outperformed SQM, delivering a return of +21.8% compared to +15.5%

SQM vs HUBB - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
SQM
$27B
HUBB
$27B
Max Drawdown
SQM
80.45%
Winner
HUBB
42.02%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
SQM
2.22
HUBB
1.22
5Y Beta
Winner
SQM
1.03
HUBB
1.21
Industry
SQM
Specialty Chemicals
HUBB
Electrical Equipment & Parts
P/E Ratio
SQM
45.26
Winner
HUBB
31.64
Forward P/E
Winner
SQM
18.35
HUBB
25.51
PEG Ratio
Winner
SQM
0.57
HUBB
3.47
Dividend Yield
Winner
SQM
1.13%
HUBB
1.11%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
SQM
15.24%
HUBB
7.71%
5Y EPS CAGR
Winner
SQM
27.43%
HUBB
17.78%
Debt to Equity
SQM
84.60%
Winner
HUBB
68.27%
Free Cash Flow Yield
SQM
1.64%
Winner
HUBB
4.05%
P/S Ratio
SQM
5.83
Winner
HUBB
4.43
P/B Ratio
Winner
SQM
4.50
HUBB
7.04

SQM vs HUBB - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
SQM
+12.05%
HUBB
-6.58%
3M
Winner
SQM
+29.89%
HUBB
-2.42%
6M
Winner
SQM
+89.61%
HUBB
+7.15%
1Y
Winner
SQM
+170.16%
HUBB
+40.65%
5Y(CAGR)
SQM
+15.46%
Winner
HUBB
+21.77%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
SQM
+21.00%
HUBB
+19.25%
Max(CAGR)
SQM
+18.62%
Winner
HUBB
+18.89%

SQM vs HUBB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearSQMHUBB
2026+32.54%+6.66%
2025+91.19%+7.16%
2024-38.56%+30.12%
2023-15.40%+42.52%
2022+70.49%+16.72%
2021+2.60%+36.23%
2020+87.42%+8.40%
2019-27.79%+53.34%
2018-35.04%-23.97%
2017+113.53%+17.86%
2016+61.04%+17.26%
2015-20.43%-0.37%
2014-1.99%N/A
2013-54.46%N/A
2012+7.62%N/A
2011-7.72%N/A
2010+53.00%N/A
2009+51.16%N/A
2008+46.55%N/A
2007+33.91%N/A
2006+23.39%N/A
2005+82.30%N/A
2004+52.01%N/A
2003+94.94%N/A
2002-8.87%N/A
2001+19.25%N/A
2000-10.37%N/A
1999+9.77%N/A

SQM vs HUBB Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for SQM was -78.36%, occurring on Jul 27, 2015. Recovery took 1547 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for HUBB was -41.62%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 142 trading sessions.

The current SQM drawdown is -6.92%. The current HUBB drawdown is -11.71%.

RankSQMHUBB
#1-78.36%
Jul 22, 2011 - Sep 14, 2017
-41.62%
Feb 11, 2020 - Sep 2, 2020
#2-73.00%
Jan 11, 2018 - Jan 6, 2021
-32.65%
Nov 6, 2024 - Oct 29, 2025
#3-72.14%
Jun 18, 2008 - Nov 4, 2010
-31.63%
Sep 21, 2018 - Sep 6, 2019
#4-69.81%
Sep 14, 2022 - Jun 2, 2025
-25.94%
Jan 26, 2018 - Sep 21, 2018
#5-35.54%
Feb 4, 2000 - May 17, 2002
-19.77%
Jul 20, 2023 - Jan 30, 2024
#6-31.32%
Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 21, 2006
-17.55%
Dec 29, 2021 - Jul 27, 2022
#7-30.96%
Jan 12, 2021 - Nov 2, 2021
-16.47%
Dec 30, 2015 - Mar 18, 2016
#8-29.41%
Nov 22, 2021 - Feb 15, 2022
-15.96%
Apr 3, 2024 - Sep 19, 2024
#9-27.46%
Oct 21, 2003 - Aug 26, 2004
-14.20%
Aug 30, 2021 - Nov 9, 2021
#10-26.31%
May 27, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022
-13.86%
Nov 22, 2022 - Apr 25, 2023
#11-26.31%
Oct 11, 2007 - Feb 27, 2008
-13.80%
Oct 29, 2025 - Jan 6, 2026
#12-24.67%
May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2003
-11.80%
May 6, 2021 - Jul 30, 2021
#13-19.95%
Jul 2, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007
-11.71%
Apr 23, 2026 - May 8, 2026
#14-19.89%
Apr 4, 2022 - May 17, 2022
-11.57%
Feb 3, 2017 - Oct 24, 2017
#15-19.15%
Aug 15, 2022 - Sep 14, 2022
-11.40%
Sep 2, 2020 - Oct 22, 2020

Correlation

Correlation between SQM and HUBB is 0.54 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.54
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

SQM vs HUBB dividend yield comparison.

YearSQMHUBB
20261.13%0.29%
20250.18%1.21%
20240.59%1.19%
20238.34%1.39%
20229.66%1.82%
20213.92%1.92%
20201.64%2.37%
20194.55%2.32%
20185.37%3.17%
20172.73%2.12%
20164.77%2.22%
20152.00%0.00%
20144.71%0.00%
20133.21%0.00%
20121.69%0.00%
20111.40%0.00%
20100.87%0.00%
20092.70%0.00%
20083.71%0.00%
20072.01%0.00%
20061.76%0.00%
20051.49%0.00%
20041.21%0.00%
20031.20%0.00%
20021.88%0.00%
20012.16%0.00%
200042.10%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare