SQM vs HBANP
Comparison between Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM, Company) and Huntington Bancshares Inc (HBANP, Company).
SQM is from the Basic Materials sector, while HBANP is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceSQM has outperformed HBANP, delivering a return of +15.5% compared to -2.0%
SQM vs HBANP - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
SQM vs HBANP - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
SQM vs HBANP - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | SQM | HBANP |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +32.54% | +0.17% |
| 2025 | +91.19% | -0.75% |
| 2024 | -38.56% | +6.18% |
| 2023 | -15.40% | +8.30% |
| 2022 | +70.49% | -30.98% |
| 2021 | +2.60% | +9.66% |
| 2020 | +87.42% | N/A |
| 2019 | -27.79% | N/A |
| 2018 | -35.04% | N/A |
| 2017 | +113.53% | N/A |
| 2016 | +61.04% | N/A |
| 2015 | -20.43% | N/A |
| 2014 | -1.99% | N/A |
| 2013 | -54.46% | N/A |
| 2012 | +7.62% | N/A |
| 2011 | -7.72% | N/A |
| 2010 | +53.00% | N/A |
| 2009 | +51.16% | N/A |
| 2008 | +46.55% | N/A |
| 2007 | +33.91% | N/A |
| 2006 | +23.39% | N/A |
| 2005 | +82.30% | N/A |
| 2004 | +52.01% | N/A |
| 2003 | +94.94% | N/A |
| 2002 | -8.87% | N/A |
| 2001 | +19.25% | N/A |
| 2000 | -10.37% | N/A |
| 1999 | +9.77% | N/A |
SQM vs HBANP Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for SQM was -78.36%, occurring on Jul 27, 2015. Recovery took 1547 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for HBANP was -41.84%, occurring on May 4, 2023. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current SQM drawdown is -6.92%. The current HBANP drawdown is -15.58%.
| Rank | SQM | HBANP |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -78.36% Jul 22, 2011 - Sep 14, 2017 | -41.84% Dec 31, 2021 - May 4, 2023 |
| #2 | -73.00% Jan 11, 2018 - Jan 6, 2021 | -5.00% Sep 3, 2021 - Dec 16, 2021 |
| #3 | -72.14% Jun 18, 2008 - Nov 4, 2010 | -3.93% Feb 11, 2021 - Mar 15, 2021 |
| #4 | -69.81% Sep 14, 2022 - Jun 2, 2025 | -2.74% Jul 7, 2021 - Sep 3, 2021 |
| #5 | -35.54% Feb 4, 2000 - May 17, 2002 | -1.73% Mar 25, 2021 - Apr 22, 2021 |
| #6 | -31.32% Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 21, 2006 | -1.65% Apr 23, 2021 - May 27, 2021 |
| #7 | -30.96% Jan 12, 2021 - Nov 2, 2021 | -1.54% Mar 15, 2021 - Mar 23, 2021 |
| #8 | -29.41% Nov 22, 2021 - Feb 15, 2022 | -1.15% Dec 16, 2021 - Dec 28, 2021 |
| #9 | -27.46% Oct 21, 2003 - Aug 26, 2004 | -1.11% Jun 15, 2021 - Jun 23, 2021 |
| #10 | -26.31% May 27, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022 | -1.04% Jun 2, 2021 - Jun 7, 2021 |
| #11 | -26.31% Oct 11, 2007 - Feb 27, 2008 | -0.57% Jul 2, 2021 - Jul 7, 2021 |
| #12 | -24.67% May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2003 | -0.41% Jun 25, 2021 - Jul 1, 2021 |
| #13 | -19.95% Jul 2, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007 | -0.32% Feb 4, 2021 - Feb 9, 2021 |
| #14 | -19.89% Apr 4, 2022 - May 17, 2022 | -0.11% Dec 28, 2021 - Dec 30, 2021 |
| #15 | -19.15% Aug 15, 2022 - Sep 14, 2022 | -0.08% Jun 10, 2021 - Jun 14, 2021 |
Correlation
Correlation between SQM and HBANP is -0.44 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
SQM vs HBANP dividend yield comparison.
| Year | SQM | HBANP |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.13% | 1.65% |
| 2025 | 0.18% | 6.58% |
| 2024 | 0.59% | 6.35% |
| 2023 | 8.34% | 6.38% |
| 2022 | 9.66% | 6.63% |
| 2021 | 3.92% | 4.00% |
| 2020 | 1.64% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 4.55% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 5.37% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 2.73% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 4.77% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 2.00% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 4.71% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 3.21% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 1.69% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 1.40% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 0.87% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 2.70% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 3.71% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 2.01% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 1.76% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 1.49% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 1.21% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 1.20% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 1.88% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 2.16% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 42.10% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks