SM vs EMN
Comparison between SM Energy Company (SM, Company) and Eastman Chemical Company (EMN, Company).
SM is from the Energy sector, while EMN is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceSM has outperformed EMN, delivering a return of +14.6% compared to -5.7%
SM vs EMN - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
SM vs EMN - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
SM vs EMN - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | SM | EMN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +77.85% | +8.12% |
| 2025 | -51.47% | -24.53% |
| 2024 | +1.24% | +5.62% |
| 2023 | +23.24% | +13.61% |
| 2022 | +10.45% | -29.62% |
| 2021 | +363.97% | +25.71% |
| 2020 | -44.67% | +32.48% |
| 2019 | -26.03% | +12.06% |
| 2018 | -33.18% | -20.50% |
| 2017 | -35.30% | +25.08% |
| 2016 | +73.27% | +15.91% |
| 2015 | -48.64% | -9.67% |
| 2014 | -53.20% | -3.84% |
| 2013 | +52.35% | +17.63% |
| 2012 | -31.45% | +72.68% |
| 2011 | +21.34% | -6.26% |
| 2010 | +63.50% | +39.87% |
| 2009 | +56.80% | +90.79% |
| 2008 | -48.20% | -45.80% |
| 2007 | +10.56% | +4.61% |
| 2006 | -4.22% | +17.28% |
| 2005 | +82.35% | -6.99% |
| 2004 | +44.17% | +51.49% |
| 2003 | +11.53% | +10.46% |
| 2002 | +16.86% | -1.78% |
| 2001 | -30.19% | -14.35% |
| 2000 | +185.26% | +9.36% |
| 1999 | -0.33% | +27.57% |
SM vs EMN Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for SM was -98.85%, occurring on Apr 1, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for EMN was -76.10%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 588 trading sessions.
The current SM drawdown is -58.38%. The current EMN drawdown is -36.69%.
| Rank | SM | EMN |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -98.85% Nov 26, 2013 - Apr 1, 2020 | -76.10% May 20, 2008 - Sep 20, 2010 |
| #2 | -82.05% Jun 30, 2008 - Feb 15, 2011 | -62.79% Mar 12, 2018 - Nov 24, 2020 |
| #3 | -57.19% Jan 16, 2001 - Apr 12, 2004 | -49.36% Jan 18, 2022 - Nov 20, 2025 |
| #4 | -51.83% Oct 27, 2011 - Oct 18, 2013 | -44.78% May 17, 2001 - Sep 30, 2004 |
| #5 | -31.07% Aug 3, 2011 - Oct 26, 2011 | -37.68% May 10, 2011 - Feb 3, 2012 |
| #6 | -30.27% Jul 7, 2000 - Sep 6, 2000 | -32.81% Jun 4, 2014 - Jun 13, 2017 |
| #7 | -29.50% Apr 21, 2006 - May 2, 2008 | -32.78% May 22, 2000 - Mar 7, 2001 |
| #8 | -24.07% Nov 9, 1999 - Feb 1, 2000 | -32.38% Jan 6, 2000 - Apr 28, 2000 |
| #9 | -22.46% Oct 13, 2000 - Nov 21, 2000 | -25.48% Mar 11, 2005 - Oct 27, 2006 |
| #10 | -21.62% Dec 28, 2000 - Jan 16, 2001 | -22.79% Jun 1, 2021 - Jan 18, 2022 |
| #11 | -19.66% Apr 5, 2011 - Jul 15, 2011 | -20.90% Feb 28, 2012 - Aug 7, 2012 |
| #12 | -18.80% Mar 4, 2005 - Jun 1, 2005 | -17.42% Jul 23, 2007 - Apr 8, 2008 |
| #13 | -18.52% Jan 30, 2006 - Apr 18, 2006 | -13.98% Feb 13, 2013 - Jul 15, 2013 |
| #14 | -16.88% Oct 3, 2005 - Dec 5, 2005 | -11.60% Oct 23, 2013 - Feb 13, 2014 |
| #15 | -16.26% Mar 10, 2000 - Apr 4, 2000 | -11.57% Dec 28, 2004 - Feb 25, 2005 |
Correlation
Correlation between SM and EMN is 0.19 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
SM vs EMN dividend yield comparison.
| Year | SM | EMN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.31% | 2.47% |
| 2025 | 5.35% | 5.22% |
| 2024 | 1.91% | 3.57% |
| 2023 | 1.55% | 3.54% |
| 2022 | 0.46% | 3.77% |
| 2021 | 0.07% | 2.34% |
| 2020 | 0.33% | 2.66% |
| 2019 | 0.89% | 3.18% |
| 2018 | 0.65% | 3.15% |
| 2017 | 0.45% | 2.26% |
| 2016 | 0.29% | 2.51% |
| 2015 | 0.51% | 2.46% |
| 2014 | 0.26% | 1.91% |
| 2013 | 0.12% | 1.55% |
| 2012 | 0.19% | 1.59% |
| 2011 | 0.14% | 2.53% |
| 2010 | 0.17% | 2.13% |
| 2009 | 0.29% | 2.92% |
| 2008 | 0.49% | 5.55% |
| 2007 | 0.26% | 2.88% |
| 2006 | 0.27% | 2.98% |
| 2005 | 0.27% | 3.41% |
| 2004 | 0.24% | 3.05% |
| 2003 | 0.35% | 4.45% |
| 2002 | 0.40% | 4.79% |
| 2001 | 0.47% | 4.51% |
| 2000 | 0.32% | 3.61% |
| 1999 | 0.20% | 0.92% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks