SM vs ZWS
Comparison between SM Energy Company (SM, Company) and Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp (ZWS, Company).
SM is from the Energy sector, while ZWS is from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformanceZWS has outperformed SM, delivering a return of +33.1% compared to +6.7%
SM vs ZWS - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
SM vs ZWS - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
SM vs ZWS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | SM | ZWS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +51.10% | +4.69% |
| 2025 | -51.47% | +27.18% |
| 2024 | +1.24% | +29.41% |
| 2023 | +23.24% | +39.55% |
| 2022 | +10.45% | -41.25% |
| 2021 | +363.97% | +296.38% |
| 2020 | -44.67% | +21.46% |
| 2019 | -26.03% | +39.10% |
| 2018 | -33.18% | -11.66% |
| 2017 | -35.30% | +29.20% |
| 2016 | +73.27% | +6.93% |
| 2015 | -48.64% | -35.15% |
| 2014 | -53.20% | +4.02% |
| 2013 | +52.35% | +24.36% |
| 2012 | -31.45% | +6.50% |
| 2011 | +21.34% | N/A |
| 2010 | +63.50% | N/A |
| 2009 | +56.80% | N/A |
| 2008 | -48.20% | N/A |
| 2007 | +10.56% | N/A |
| 2006 | -4.22% | N/A |
| 2005 | +82.35% | N/A |
| 2004 | +44.17% | N/A |
| 2003 | +11.53% | N/A |
| 2002 | +16.86% | N/A |
| 2001 | -30.19% | N/A |
| 2000 | +185.26% | N/A |
| 1999 | -0.33% | N/A |
SM vs ZWS Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for SM was -98.85%, occurring on Apr 1, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for ZWS was -52.43%, occurring on Jan 19, 2016. Recovery took 1140 trading sessions.
The current SM drawdown is -64.64%. The current ZWS drawdown is -7.31%.
| Rank | SM | ZWS |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -98.85% Nov 26, 2013 - Apr 1, 2020 | -52.43% Mar 7, 2014 - Sep 14, 2018 |
| #2 | -82.05% Jun 30, 2008 - Feb 15, 2011 | -47.25% Nov 19, 2021 - Oct 16, 2024 |
| #3 | -57.19% Jan 16, 2001 - Apr 12, 2004 | -45.35% Feb 13, 2020 - Nov 9, 2020 |
| #4 | -51.83% Oct 27, 2011 - Oct 18, 2013 | -31.93% Apr 30, 2012 - Oct 21, 2013 |
| #5 | -31.07% Aug 3, 2011 - Oct 26, 2011 | -31.89% Sep 21, 2018 - Dec 11, 2019 |
| #6 | -30.27% Jul 7, 2000 - Sep 6, 2000 | -30.17% Dec 9, 2024 - Jul 30, 2025 |
| #7 | -29.50% Apr 21, 2006 - May 2, 2008 | -19.24% Jan 12, 2021 - Feb 17, 2021 |
| #8 | -24.07% Nov 9, 1999 - Feb 1, 2000 | -17.02% Feb 6, 2026 - Apr 23, 2026 |
| #9 | -22.46% Oct 13, 2000 - Nov 21, 2000 | -12.18% Apr 27, 2026 - May 19, 2026 |
| #10 | -21.62% Dec 28, 2000 - Jan 16, 2001 | -10.09% Jan 22, 2014 - Feb 18, 2014 |
| #11 | -19.66% Apr 5, 2011 - Jul 15, 2011 | -10.05% Mar 12, 2021 - Apr 29, 2021 |
| #12 | -18.80% Mar 4, 2005 - Jun 1, 2005 | -8.92% May 7, 2021 - Jul 12, 2021 |
| #13 | -18.52% Jan 30, 2006 - Apr 18, 2006 | -8.33% Jul 12, 2021 - Jul 21, 2021 |
| #14 | -16.88% Oct 3, 2005 - Dec 5, 2005 | -6.83% Nov 5, 2025 - Nov 26, 2025 |
| #15 | -16.26% Mar 10, 2000 - Apr 4, 2000 | -5.66% Sep 15, 2021 - Sep 27, 2021 |
Correlation
Correlation between SM and ZWS is -0.01 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
SM vs ZWS dividend yield comparison.
| Year | SM | ZWS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.55% | 0.45% |
| 2025 | 5.35% | 0.82% |
| 2024 | 1.91% | 0.88% |
| 2023 | 1.55% | 0.99% |
| 2022 | 0.46% | 0.95% |
| 2021 | 0.07% | 92.93% |
| 2020 | 0.33% | 0.81% |
| 2019 | 0.89% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 0.65% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 0.45% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 0.29% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 0.51% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 0.26% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 0.12% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 0.19% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 0.14% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 0.17% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 0.29% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 0.49% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 0.26% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 0.27% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 0.27% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 0.24% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 0.35% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 0.40% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 0.47% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 0.32% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.20% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks